洋葱产量与土壤耕作制度和土壤含水量的关系

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
J. R. Feitosa, H. C. Fernandes, P. Cecon, D. M. Leite, Filipe M. T. Nery, J. S. Pereira
{"title":"洋葱产量与土壤耕作制度和土壤含水量的关系","authors":"J. R. Feitosa, H. C. Fernandes, P. Cecon, D. M. Leite, Filipe M. T. Nery, J. S. Pereira","doi":"10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n2p115-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excessive tillage operations under inadequate conditions can raise the cost of agricultural production and lead to soil degradation without adequate crop response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the onion crop response to soil water contents and tillage systems. Three tillage systems were evaluated: P1 (plowing + two harrowings + two seedbed raising operations), P2 (two harrowings + one seedbed raising operation), P3 (one harrowing + one seedbed raising operation); and four soil water contents: 12, 15, 23 and 26%. The experiment was conducted in the irrigated perimeter of Tourão, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil (9° 24’ 7.3” S; 40° 26’ 8.7” W and altitude of 368 m), in 2017, and was installed in split plots, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. Water contents were arranged in the plots and tillage systems in the subplots. Crop response to the applied treatments was evaluated through the determination of the emergence speed index of the seedlings, regularity of the longitudinal distribution of seedlings, final stand, total and marketable yields of the crop and yield per bulb transverse diameter class. The variation of soil water content had a quadratic effect on the variables emergence speed index, final stand and total onion yield. The treatments did not significantly affect the longitudinal distribution of plants and marketable yield. The tillage system composed of one harrowing and one seedbed raising operation showed to be the most appropriate for onion cultivation by direct seeding.","PeriodicalId":51288,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental","volume":"31 1","pages":"115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Onion yield as a function of soil tillage system and soil water content\",\"authors\":\"J. R. Feitosa, H. C. Fernandes, P. Cecon, D. M. Leite, Filipe M. T. Nery, J. S. Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n2p115-120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Excessive tillage operations under inadequate conditions can raise the cost of agricultural production and lead to soil degradation without adequate crop response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the onion crop response to soil water contents and tillage systems. Three tillage systems were evaluated: P1 (plowing + two harrowings + two seedbed raising operations), P2 (two harrowings + one seedbed raising operation), P3 (one harrowing + one seedbed raising operation); and four soil water contents: 12, 15, 23 and 26%. The experiment was conducted in the irrigated perimeter of Tourão, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil (9° 24’ 7.3” S; 40° 26’ 8.7” W and altitude of 368 m), in 2017, and was installed in split plots, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. Water contents were arranged in the plots and tillage systems in the subplots. Crop response to the applied treatments was evaluated through the determination of the emergence speed index of the seedlings, regularity of the longitudinal distribution of seedlings, final stand, total and marketable yields of the crop and yield per bulb transverse diameter class. The variation of soil water content had a quadratic effect on the variables emergence speed index, final stand and total onion yield. The treatments did not significantly affect the longitudinal distribution of plants and marketable yield. The tillage system composed of one harrowing and one seedbed raising operation showed to be the most appropriate for onion cultivation by direct seeding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"115-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n2p115-120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n2p115-120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在不适当条件下的过度耕作作业可能会提高农业生产成本,并导致土壤退化,而作物没有充分的反应。本研究的目的是评价洋葱作物对土壤含水量和耕作制度的响应。评估了三种耕作制度:P1(翻耕+两次耙耙+两次育苗作业)、P2(两次耙耙+一次育苗作业)、P3(一次耙耙+一次育苗作业);土壤含水量分别为12%、15%、23%和26%。试验在巴西BA Juazeiro tour灌溉周长(9°24′7.3”S;40°26′8.7”W,海拔368 m),并以随机块设计的方式安装在分开的地块上,重复四次。土壤含水量按样地排列,分样地采用耕作制度。通过测定幼苗出苗速度指数、幼苗纵向分布规律、终末林分、作物总产量和可售产量以及鳞茎横径级产量,评价作物对施用处理的响应。土壤含水量的变化对出苗速度指数、最终林分和洋葱总产量呈二次效应。各处理对植株纵向分布和市场产量影响不显著。一耙一畦的耕作制度最适合洋葱直播栽培。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Onion yield as a function of soil tillage system and soil water content
Excessive tillage operations under inadequate conditions can raise the cost of agricultural production and lead to soil degradation without adequate crop response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the onion crop response to soil water contents and tillage systems. Three tillage systems were evaluated: P1 (plowing + two harrowings + two seedbed raising operations), P2 (two harrowings + one seedbed raising operation), P3 (one harrowing + one seedbed raising operation); and four soil water contents: 12, 15, 23 and 26%. The experiment was conducted in the irrigated perimeter of Tourão, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil (9° 24’ 7.3” S; 40° 26’ 8.7” W and altitude of 368 m), in 2017, and was installed in split plots, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. Water contents were arranged in the plots and tillage systems in the subplots. Crop response to the applied treatments was evaluated through the determination of the emergence speed index of the seedlings, regularity of the longitudinal distribution of seedlings, final stand, total and marketable yields of the crop and yield per bulb transverse diameter class. The variation of soil water content had a quadratic effect on the variables emergence speed index, final stand and total onion yield. The treatments did not significantly affect the longitudinal distribution of plants and marketable yield. The tillage system composed of one harrowing and one seedbed raising operation showed to be the most appropriate for onion cultivation by direct seeding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
114
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Agriambi), periódico oficial da Asociación Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Ingeniería Agrícola (ALIA), é editada mensalmente, no formato eletrônico, pela Unidade Acadêmica de Engenharia Agrícola (UAEA) do Centro de Tecnologia e Recursos Naturais (CTRN) da Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), destinando-se à divulgação de artigos científicos originais e inéditos, elaborados em Português, Inglês ou Espanhol. Com o auxílio de pareceres de Consultores, os artigos são aceitos ou não pela Equipe Editorial para publicação na Revista. A Agriambi aceita, também, a submissão de contribuições na modalidade de revisão de literatura.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信