在病例对照研究中分别评价职业和行业以评估暴露

M. Dosemeci, P. Stewart, A. Blair
{"title":"在病例对照研究中分别评价职业和行业以评估暴露","authors":"M. Dosemeci, P. Stewart, A. Blair","doi":"10.1080/08828032.1989.10388587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In most occupational case-control studies, assessment of exposures is based on occupation and industry due to the lack of any other exposure information. The traditional approach to assessing exposures to specific substances is to estimate exposure for each occupation/industry combination. A modified procedure that substantially reduces the effort necessary to complete such assessments is described. In this procedure, exposure levels (none, low, medium, and high) are estimated for each occupation and industry separately. Numeric weights are assigned to these exposures levels. Final estimates for each occupation/industry combination are derived using exposure weights for occupations and industries. This method was applied to a case-control data set to estimate levels of silica exposure for the work histories of subject. The traditional method required 13,445 individual evaluations while the new approach required only 2,000 estimates. Results from the new approach were compared with those from the ...","PeriodicalId":8049,"journal":{"name":"Applied Industrial Hygiene","volume":"1 1","pages":"256-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Occupation and Industry Separately to Assess Exposures in Case-Control Studies\",\"authors\":\"M. Dosemeci, P. Stewart, A. Blair\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08828032.1989.10388587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In most occupational case-control studies, assessment of exposures is based on occupation and industry due to the lack of any other exposure information. The traditional approach to assessing exposures to specific substances is to estimate exposure for each occupation/industry combination. A modified procedure that substantially reduces the effort necessary to complete such assessments is described. In this procedure, exposure levels (none, low, medium, and high) are estimated for each occupation and industry separately. Numeric weights are assigned to these exposures levels. Final estimates for each occupation/industry combination are derived using exposure weights for occupations and industries. This method was applied to a case-control data set to estimate levels of silica exposure for the work histories of subject. The traditional method required 13,445 individual evaluations while the new approach required only 2,000 estimates. Results from the new approach were compared with those from the ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":8049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Industrial Hygiene\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"256-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Industrial Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08828032.1989.10388587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Industrial Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08828032.1989.10388587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

在大多数职业病例对照研究中,由于缺乏其他暴露信息,暴露评估是基于职业和行业的。评估特定物质暴露的传统方法是估计每个职业/行业组合的暴露。本文描述了一种经过修改的程序,该程序大大减少了完成此类评估所需的工作量。在这个程序中,分别估计每个职业和行业的暴露水平(无、低、中、高)。数值权重被分配给这些暴露水平。每个职业/行业组合的最终估计是使用职业和行业的暴露权重得出的。该方法应用于病例对照数据集,以估计受试者工作历史中的二氧化硅暴露水平。传统方法需要13445次个人评价,而新方法只需要2000次估计。将新方法的结果与传统方法的结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Occupation and Industry Separately to Assess Exposures in Case-Control Studies
Abstract In most occupational case-control studies, assessment of exposures is based on occupation and industry due to the lack of any other exposure information. The traditional approach to assessing exposures to specific substances is to estimate exposure for each occupation/industry combination. A modified procedure that substantially reduces the effort necessary to complete such assessments is described. In this procedure, exposure levels (none, low, medium, and high) are estimated for each occupation and industry separately. Numeric weights are assigned to these exposures levels. Final estimates for each occupation/industry combination are derived using exposure weights for occupations and industries. This method was applied to a case-control data set to estimate levels of silica exposure for the work histories of subject. The traditional method required 13,445 individual evaluations while the new approach required only 2,000 estimates. Results from the new approach were compared with those from the ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信