使用众包市场进行网络测量:欺骗案例

Qasim Lone, M. Luckie, Maciej Korczyński, H. Asghari, M. Javed, M. V. Eeten
{"title":"使用众包市场进行网络测量:欺骗案例","authors":"Qasim Lone, M. Luckie, Maciej Korczyński, H. Asghari, M. Javed, M. V. Eeten","doi":"10.23919/TMA.2018.8506499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet measurement tools are used to make inferences about network policies and practices across the Internet, such as censorship, traffic manipulation, bandwidth, and security measures. Some tools must be run from vantage points within individual networks, so are dependent on volunteer recruitment. A small pool of volunteers limits the impact of these tools. Crowdsourcing marketplaces can potentially recruit workers to run tools from networks not covered by the volunteer pool. We design an infrastructure to collect and synchronize measurements from five crowdsourcing platforms, and use that infrastructure to collect data on network source address validation policies for CAIDA's Spoofer project. In six weeks we increased the coverage of Spoofer measurements by recruiting 1519 workers from within 91 countries and 784 unique ASes for 2,000 Euro; 342 of these ASes were not previously covered, and represent a 15% increase in ASes over the prior 12 months. We describe lessons learned in recruiting and renumerating workers; in particular, strategies to address worker behavior when workers are screened because of overlap in the volunteer pool.","PeriodicalId":6607,"journal":{"name":"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","volume":"172 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Crowdsourcing Marketplaces for Network Measurements: The Case of Spoofer\",\"authors\":\"Qasim Lone, M. Luckie, Maciej Korczyński, H. Asghari, M. Javed, M. V. Eeten\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/TMA.2018.8506499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internet measurement tools are used to make inferences about network policies and practices across the Internet, such as censorship, traffic manipulation, bandwidth, and security measures. Some tools must be run from vantage points within individual networks, so are dependent on volunteer recruitment. A small pool of volunteers limits the impact of these tools. Crowdsourcing marketplaces can potentially recruit workers to run tools from networks not covered by the volunteer pool. We design an infrastructure to collect and synchronize measurements from five crowdsourcing platforms, and use that infrastructure to collect data on network source address validation policies for CAIDA's Spoofer project. In six weeks we increased the coverage of Spoofer measurements by recruiting 1519 workers from within 91 countries and 784 unique ASes for 2,000 Euro; 342 of these ASes were not previously covered, and represent a 15% increase in ASes over the prior 12 months. We describe lessons learned in recruiting and renumerating workers; in particular, strategies to address worker behavior when workers are screened because of overlap in the volunteer pool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)\",\"volume\":\"172 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2018.8506499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2018.8506499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

互联网测量工具用于推断互联网上的网络政策和实践,例如审查、流量操纵、带宽和安全措施。有些工具必须从个人网络的有利位置运行,因此依赖于志愿者招募。一小部分志愿者限制了这些工具的影响。众包市场可能会从志愿者库未覆盖的网络中招募工人来运行工具。我们设计了一个基础设施来收集和同步来自五个众包平台的测量数据,并使用该基础设施来收集CAIDA的Spoofer项目的网络源地址验证策略数据。在6周内,我们以2000欧元的价格招募了来自91个国家的1519名员工和784个独特的ASes,从而扩大了Spoofer测量的覆盖范围;其中有342例安全事件以前没有包括在内,比过去12个月增加了15%。我们描述了在招聘和给员工发工资方面的经验教训;特别是,当由于志愿者重叠而对员工进行筛选时,解决员工行为的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Crowdsourcing Marketplaces for Network Measurements: The Case of Spoofer
Internet measurement tools are used to make inferences about network policies and practices across the Internet, such as censorship, traffic manipulation, bandwidth, and security measures. Some tools must be run from vantage points within individual networks, so are dependent on volunteer recruitment. A small pool of volunteers limits the impact of these tools. Crowdsourcing marketplaces can potentially recruit workers to run tools from networks not covered by the volunteer pool. We design an infrastructure to collect and synchronize measurements from five crowdsourcing platforms, and use that infrastructure to collect data on network source address validation policies for CAIDA's Spoofer project. In six weeks we increased the coverage of Spoofer measurements by recruiting 1519 workers from within 91 countries and 784 unique ASes for 2,000 Euro; 342 of these ASes were not previously covered, and represent a 15% increase in ASes over the prior 12 months. We describe lessons learned in recruiting and renumerating workers; in particular, strategies to address worker behavior when workers are screened because of overlap in the volunteer pool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信