“他们认为它(语法)几乎是异端”希伯来语语法和语言学在Beit Hamidrash, Beit Haseifer, and Beit Hak’neset

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Moshe Sokolow
{"title":"“他们认为它(语法)几乎是异端”希伯来语语法和语言学在Beit Hamidrash, Beit Haseifer, and Beit Hak’neset","authors":"Moshe Sokolow","doi":"10.1353/hbr.2022.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Describing his own work as \"the first attempt since the Mikhlol to record, explain, and arrange the tradition of grammatical knowledge systematically,\" Zalman Hena (1687–1746), one of the outstanding Hebrew grammarians of his era, built a theoretical linguistic edifice (a youthful opus was even called Binyan Sh'lomo) on a combination of the critical analysis of his predecessors and considerable original, even radical, thinking. If one of the accomplishments of the Haskalah was the renaissance of Hebrew, then it appears that Zalman Hena bears significant responsibility for that achievement, even though it is likely that he would have dissociated himself from that movement as did most of the Orthodox communities of Central Europe in which he lived.Yonatan Wormser, a professor of Hebrew language at the College of Efrata, provides us with a comprehensive portrait of Hena's theories on phonology, including vocalization and the nature of the letters, and morphology, including the construction of Hebrew roots, verbal stems (binyanim) and conjugations, and the classifications of nouns. The book also covers matters of syntax, semantics, and rhetoric, such as the use of particles, the definite article, gender and number, absolute and construct states, parts of speech, and word order.Another chapter describes Hena's attempts to formulate new rules, or recast old ones, to account for many of what his predecessors saw as exceptions and anomalies. Because he was dedicated to the proposition that Hebrew is a God-given language and, hence, perfect, he sought to limit the number of grammatical exceptions to those that were crafted deliberately to draw attention to (unspecified) esoteric meanings. A final chapter details Hena's application of his grammatical theories to standard Ashkenazic liturgical texts to correct what he saw as numerous mistakes in vocalization and punctuation. This effort met with considerable resistance and had a patent impact on Hena's life and reputation.Herein, we shall endeavor to place Hena's work, and Wormser's informative and functional guide, into a larger historical and cultural context, exploring the role and impact of formal grammatical study in three dimensions: the beit hamidrash (representing traditional religious scholarship), the beit haseifer (Jewish education), and the beit hak'neset (apropos of Hena's liturgical emendations).","PeriodicalId":35110,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Studies","volume":"61 4 1","pages":"291 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"They Regard it [Grammar] as Nearly Heretical\\\" Hebrew Grammar and Philology in the Beit Hamidrash, Beit Haseifer, and Beit Hak'neset\",\"authors\":\"Moshe Sokolow\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hbr.2022.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Describing his own work as \\\"the first attempt since the Mikhlol to record, explain, and arrange the tradition of grammatical knowledge systematically,\\\" Zalman Hena (1687–1746), one of the outstanding Hebrew grammarians of his era, built a theoretical linguistic edifice (a youthful opus was even called Binyan Sh'lomo) on a combination of the critical analysis of his predecessors and considerable original, even radical, thinking. If one of the accomplishments of the Haskalah was the renaissance of Hebrew, then it appears that Zalman Hena bears significant responsibility for that achievement, even though it is likely that he would have dissociated himself from that movement as did most of the Orthodox communities of Central Europe in which he lived.Yonatan Wormser, a professor of Hebrew language at the College of Efrata, provides us with a comprehensive portrait of Hena's theories on phonology, including vocalization and the nature of the letters, and morphology, including the construction of Hebrew roots, verbal stems (binyanim) and conjugations, and the classifications of nouns. The book also covers matters of syntax, semantics, and rhetoric, such as the use of particles, the definite article, gender and number, absolute and construct states, parts of speech, and word order.Another chapter describes Hena's attempts to formulate new rules, or recast old ones, to account for many of what his predecessors saw as exceptions and anomalies. Because he was dedicated to the proposition that Hebrew is a God-given language and, hence, perfect, he sought to limit the number of grammatical exceptions to those that were crafted deliberately to draw attention to (unspecified) esoteric meanings. A final chapter details Hena's application of his grammatical theories to standard Ashkenazic liturgical texts to correct what he saw as numerous mistakes in vocalization and punctuation. This effort met with considerable resistance and had a patent impact on Hena's life and reputation.Herein, we shall endeavor to place Hena's work, and Wormser's informative and functional guide, into a larger historical and cultural context, exploring the role and impact of formal grammatical study in three dimensions: the beit hamidrash (representing traditional religious scholarship), the beit haseifer (Jewish education), and the beit hak'neset (apropos of Hena's liturgical emendations).\",\"PeriodicalId\":35110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"volume\":\"61 4 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2022.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2022.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:扎尔曼·赫纳(1687-1746)是当代杰出的希伯来语法学家之一,他将自己的著作描述为“自米哈伊尔以来第一次系统地记录、解释和整理语法知识传统的尝试”。他在前人的批判性分析和相当多的原创甚至激进的思考的基础上,建立了一座理论语言学大厦(他的一部年轻作品甚至被称为《宾言》)。如果Haskalah的成就之一是希伯来语的复兴,那么Zalman Hena似乎对这一成就负有重大责任,尽管他可能会像他所生活的中欧大多数东正教社区一样,与这一运动分离。尤纳坦·沃姆瑟是埃弗拉塔学院的希伯来语教授,他向我们全面介绍了希纳的音系理论,包括发音和字母的性质,以及形态学,包括希伯来语词根的结构、词根(binyanim)和词形,以及名词的分类。这本书还涵盖了语法、语义和修辞学等问题,如小品的使用、定冠词、性别和数、绝对和结构状态、词性和词序。另一章描述了Hena试图制定新规则,或修改旧规则,以解释他的前任视为例外和异常的许多情况。因为他致力于希伯来语是上帝赐予的语言,因此是完美的这一命题,他试图将语法例外的数量限制在那些故意设计以吸引人们注意(未明确的)深奥含义的语法例外的数量上。最后一章详细介绍了Hena如何将他的语法理论应用到标准的德系犹太礼仪文本中,以纠正他所看到的发音和标点符号方面的大量错误。这一努力遇到了相当大的阻力,并对海纳的生活和声誉产生了明显的影响。在这里,我们将努力把希纳的工作,以及沃姆瑟的信息和功能指南,放在一个更大的历史和文化背景下,从三个方面探索正式语法研究的作用和影响:beit hamidrash(代表传统宗教学术),beit haseifer(犹太教育)和beit hak'neset(关于希纳的礼仪修订)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"They Regard it [Grammar] as Nearly Heretical" Hebrew Grammar and Philology in the Beit Hamidrash, Beit Haseifer, and Beit Hak'neset
Abstract:Describing his own work as "the first attempt since the Mikhlol to record, explain, and arrange the tradition of grammatical knowledge systematically," Zalman Hena (1687–1746), one of the outstanding Hebrew grammarians of his era, built a theoretical linguistic edifice (a youthful opus was even called Binyan Sh'lomo) on a combination of the critical analysis of his predecessors and considerable original, even radical, thinking. If one of the accomplishments of the Haskalah was the renaissance of Hebrew, then it appears that Zalman Hena bears significant responsibility for that achievement, even though it is likely that he would have dissociated himself from that movement as did most of the Orthodox communities of Central Europe in which he lived.Yonatan Wormser, a professor of Hebrew language at the College of Efrata, provides us with a comprehensive portrait of Hena's theories on phonology, including vocalization and the nature of the letters, and morphology, including the construction of Hebrew roots, verbal stems (binyanim) and conjugations, and the classifications of nouns. The book also covers matters of syntax, semantics, and rhetoric, such as the use of particles, the definite article, gender and number, absolute and construct states, parts of speech, and word order.Another chapter describes Hena's attempts to formulate new rules, or recast old ones, to account for many of what his predecessors saw as exceptions and anomalies. Because he was dedicated to the proposition that Hebrew is a God-given language and, hence, perfect, he sought to limit the number of grammatical exceptions to those that were crafted deliberately to draw attention to (unspecified) esoteric meanings. A final chapter details Hena's application of his grammatical theories to standard Ashkenazic liturgical texts to correct what he saw as numerous mistakes in vocalization and punctuation. This effort met with considerable resistance and had a patent impact on Hena's life and reputation.Herein, we shall endeavor to place Hena's work, and Wormser's informative and functional guide, into a larger historical and cultural context, exploring the role and impact of formal grammatical study in three dimensions: the beit hamidrash (representing traditional religious scholarship), the beit haseifer (Jewish education), and the beit hak'neset (apropos of Hena's liturgical emendations).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hebrew Studies
Hebrew Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信