领导力特刊:我们需要真实的领导力吗?质疑新世界秩序中的真实性

M. Iszatt‐White, Brigid Carroll, Rita A. Gardiner, S. Kempster
{"title":"领导力特刊:我们需要真实的领导力吗?质疑新世界秩序中的真实性","authors":"M. Iszatt‐White, Brigid Carroll, Rita A. Gardiner, S. Kempster","doi":"10.1177/17427150211000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authentic Leadership (AL) has been claimed as the ‘root construct’ (Avolio and Gardner, 2005) for other forms of ‘aspirational’ leadership with underpinnings in positive psychology. It has also been explicitly positioned as a response to the ‘ethical corporate meltdown’ (May et al., 2003: 247) said to have resulted from previous forms of leadership. Yet it has struggled to live up to its acknowledged functionalist and instrumentalist aims. At the same time, AL has proved resistant to important philosophical challenges seeking to problematize the nature of the ‘true self’ and draw attention to the complexities of enacting authenticity in the daily practice of leadership. These ambitious claims and unaddressed issues are at the heart of this special issue’s enquiry as to whether AL is fit for purpose as a driver of leadership theory and practice in the current world order, and its call for more critical attention to be paid to the notion of authenticity in leadership. The contributions to this special issue blend traditional, empirical papers with invited ‘Leading Questions’ thought pieces to offer a fundamental interrogation of authenticity at the same time as achieving a balance of perspectives.","PeriodicalId":92094,"journal":{"name":"Leadership (London)","volume":"52 1","pages":"389 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leadership Special Issue: Do we need Authentic Leadership? Interrogating authenticity in a new world order\",\"authors\":\"M. Iszatt‐White, Brigid Carroll, Rita A. Gardiner, S. Kempster\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17427150211000153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Authentic Leadership (AL) has been claimed as the ‘root construct’ (Avolio and Gardner, 2005) for other forms of ‘aspirational’ leadership with underpinnings in positive psychology. It has also been explicitly positioned as a response to the ‘ethical corporate meltdown’ (May et al., 2003: 247) said to have resulted from previous forms of leadership. Yet it has struggled to live up to its acknowledged functionalist and instrumentalist aims. At the same time, AL has proved resistant to important philosophical challenges seeking to problematize the nature of the ‘true self’ and draw attention to the complexities of enacting authenticity in the daily practice of leadership. These ambitious claims and unaddressed issues are at the heart of this special issue’s enquiry as to whether AL is fit for purpose as a driver of leadership theory and practice in the current world order, and its call for more critical attention to be paid to the notion of authenticity in leadership. The contributions to this special issue blend traditional, empirical papers with invited ‘Leading Questions’ thought pieces to offer a fundamental interrogation of authenticity at the same time as achieving a balance of perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership (London)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"389 - 394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership (London)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211000153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership (London)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在积极心理学的基础上,真实领导(AL)被认为是其他形式的“抱负”领导的“根结构”(Avolio and Gardner, 2005)。它也被明确定位为对“道德企业崩溃”(May et al., 2003: 247)的回应,据说这是由以前的领导形式造成的。然而,它一直在努力实现其公认的功能主义和工具主义目标。与此同时,人工智能已经被证明能够抵抗重要的哲学挑战,这些挑战试图将“真实自我”的本质问题化,并引起人们对在日常领导实践中制定真实性的复杂性的关注。这些雄心勃勃的主张和未解决的问题是本期特刊探讨的核心,即人工智能是否适合作为当前世界秩序中领导力理论和实践的驱动力,并呼吁对领导力真实性的概念给予更多的批判性关注。本期特刊的贡献融合了传统的实证论文和受邀的“主要问题”思想片段,在实现观点平衡的同时,提供了对真实性的基本质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leadership Special Issue: Do we need Authentic Leadership? Interrogating authenticity in a new world order
Authentic Leadership (AL) has been claimed as the ‘root construct’ (Avolio and Gardner, 2005) for other forms of ‘aspirational’ leadership with underpinnings in positive psychology. It has also been explicitly positioned as a response to the ‘ethical corporate meltdown’ (May et al., 2003: 247) said to have resulted from previous forms of leadership. Yet it has struggled to live up to its acknowledged functionalist and instrumentalist aims. At the same time, AL has proved resistant to important philosophical challenges seeking to problematize the nature of the ‘true self’ and draw attention to the complexities of enacting authenticity in the daily practice of leadership. These ambitious claims and unaddressed issues are at the heart of this special issue’s enquiry as to whether AL is fit for purpose as a driver of leadership theory and practice in the current world order, and its call for more critical attention to be paid to the notion of authenticity in leadership. The contributions to this special issue blend traditional, empirical papers with invited ‘Leading Questions’ thought pieces to offer a fundamental interrogation of authenticity at the same time as achieving a balance of perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信