被引用最多的网络来源是否提供了正确的流感疫苗接种信息?

E. M. Saricaoğlu, Ayda Gholizadeh, Cemre Kırım, Elif Yunt, Ihsan Mert Turk, İlker Anıl Celik, Kardelennur Yıldırım, Pelin Ozbakir, A. Azap
{"title":"被引用最多的网络来源是否提供了正确的流感疫苗接种信息?","authors":"E. M. Saricaoğlu, Ayda Gholizadeh, Cemre Kırım, Elif Yunt, Ihsan Mert Turk, İlker Anıl Celik, Kardelennur Yıldırım, Pelin Ozbakir, A. Azap","doi":"10.36519/10.36519/idcm.2021.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The Internet is increasingly preferred as a source of health-related information. However, several studies revealed deficiencies in the quality of web-based health information. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the content and design of influenza vaccine-related websites. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using a search engine, Google Search, in the Turkish language. We identified 15 influenza-related search terms, and for each term, the top ten links on the first page were included in the study after removing duplicate links. Then, we evaluated identified websites in terms of content and design criteria. Results: Seventy-one links related to influenza vaccination were evaluated in our study. The mean content criteria score of all selected websites was 11.5 points. While academic websites received the highest contents point with 22.5, news and hospital sites remained under the average with 10.5 and 8.9 points, respectively. Thirty-eight per cent of the websites had aesthetic/content professionalism, and 77.5% included contact information. References were shown only in 14.1% of websites. The websites with higher design criteria did not have higher content points. Conclusion: The Internet remains a frequently referenced source of information. The accuracy of the information on health topics included on the Internet is important in terms of public health. Unfortunately, according to our study, the top websites giving information on influenza vaccination were not well designed and had insufficient content.","PeriodicalId":11964,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do the Most Cited Web Sources Provide Proper Information on Influenza Vaccination?\",\"authors\":\"E. M. Saricaoğlu, Ayda Gholizadeh, Cemre Kırım, Elif Yunt, Ihsan Mert Turk, İlker Anıl Celik, Kardelennur Yıldırım, Pelin Ozbakir, A. Azap\",\"doi\":\"10.36519/10.36519/idcm.2021.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The Internet is increasingly preferred as a source of health-related information. However, several studies revealed deficiencies in the quality of web-based health information. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the content and design of influenza vaccine-related websites. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using a search engine, Google Search, in the Turkish language. We identified 15 influenza-related search terms, and for each term, the top ten links on the first page were included in the study after removing duplicate links. Then, we evaluated identified websites in terms of content and design criteria. Results: Seventy-one links related to influenza vaccination were evaluated in our study. The mean content criteria score of all selected websites was 11.5 points. While academic websites received the highest contents point with 22.5, news and hospital sites remained under the average with 10.5 and 8.9 points, respectively. Thirty-eight per cent of the websites had aesthetic/content professionalism, and 77.5% included contact information. References were shown only in 14.1% of websites. The websites with higher design criteria did not have higher content points. Conclusion: The Internet remains a frequently referenced source of information. The accuracy of the information on health topics included on the Internet is important in terms of public health. Unfortunately, according to our study, the top websites giving information on influenza vaccination were not well designed and had insufficient content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36519/10.36519/idcm.2021.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/10.36519/idcm.2021.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:互联网作为健康相关信息的来源越来越受欢迎。然而,几项研究揭示了基于网络的健康信息的质量不足。因此,本研究旨在分析流感疫苗相关网站的内容和设计。材料和方法:本研究使用土耳其语的搜索引擎Google search进行。我们确定了15个与流感相关的搜索词,对于每个词,在删除重复链接后,第一页上的前十个链接被包括在研究中。然后,我们根据内容和设计标准评估确定的网站。结果:我们的研究评估了71个与流感疫苗接种相关的环节。所有入选网站的内容标准平均得分为11.5分。学术网站的内容得分最高,为22.5分,而新闻网站和医院网站的内容得分分别为10.5分和8.9分,低于平均水平。38%的网站具有美学/内容专业性,77.5%的网站包含联系信息。只有14.1%的网站显示了参考文献。设计标准较高的网站并没有较高的内容点。结论:互联网仍然是一个经常被引用的信息来源。就公共卫生而言,互联网上关于卫生主题的信息的准确性很重要。不幸的是,根据我们的研究,提供流感疫苗信息的顶级网站设计不佳,内容不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do the Most Cited Web Sources Provide Proper Information on Influenza Vaccination?
Objective: The Internet is increasingly preferred as a source of health-related information. However, several studies revealed deficiencies in the quality of web-based health information. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the content and design of influenza vaccine-related websites. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using a search engine, Google Search, in the Turkish language. We identified 15 influenza-related search terms, and for each term, the top ten links on the first page were included in the study after removing duplicate links. Then, we evaluated identified websites in terms of content and design criteria. Results: Seventy-one links related to influenza vaccination were evaluated in our study. The mean content criteria score of all selected websites was 11.5 points. While academic websites received the highest contents point with 22.5, news and hospital sites remained under the average with 10.5 and 8.9 points, respectively. Thirty-eight per cent of the websites had aesthetic/content professionalism, and 77.5% included contact information. References were shown only in 14.1% of websites. The websites with higher design criteria did not have higher content points. Conclusion: The Internet remains a frequently referenced source of information. The accuracy of the information on health topics included on the Internet is important in terms of public health. Unfortunately, according to our study, the top websites giving information on influenza vaccination were not well designed and had insufficient content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信