代理政府:其权限范围和议会控制(11月14日对STC 124/2018的评论)

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
M. A. Reyes
{"title":"代理政府:其权限范围和议会控制(11月14日对STC 124/2018的评论)","authors":"M. A. Reyes","doi":"10.18042/cepc/redc.119.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEste trabajo analiza una importante sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional que viene a establecer, por primera vez en la jurisprudencia constitucional (antes no se habia dado ningun caso acerca de ello), la pertinencia del control parlamentario de los Gobiernos en funciones, consolidando un entendimiento del control, en el Estado democratico, y del control parlamentario, en nuestra forma de gobierno, que habia venido sosteniendo la doctrina mas solvente. A proposito de la sentencia, se propone el reexamen de las competencias de los Gobiernos en funciones para acomodarlas a las exigencias del presente. EnglishThis work analyses an important Judgment of the Constitutional Court that establishes, for the first time in constitutional jurisprudence (there had been no case on this before), the relevance of parliamentary control of the outgoing Governments, consolidating an understanding of control, in the democratic State, and of parliamentary control, in our form of Government, which had been sustaining the most solvent doctrine. With regard to the Judgment, the re-examination of the competences of the acting Governments is proposed to accommodate them to the ddemands of the present.","PeriodicalId":51707,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Derecho Constitucional","volume":"82 1","pages":"267-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El Gobierno en funciones: su ámbito competencial y su control parlamentario (comentario a la STC 124/2018, de 14 de noviembre)\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Reyes\",\"doi\":\"10.18042/cepc/redc.119.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEste trabajo analiza una importante sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional que viene a establecer, por primera vez en la jurisprudencia constitucional (antes no se habia dado ningun caso acerca de ello), la pertinencia del control parlamentario de los Gobiernos en funciones, consolidando un entendimiento del control, en el Estado democratico, y del control parlamentario, en nuestra forma de gobierno, que habia venido sosteniendo la doctrina mas solvente. A proposito de la sentencia, se propone el reexamen de las competencias de los Gobiernos en funciones para acomodarlas a las exigencias del presente. EnglishThis work analyses an important Judgment of the Constitutional Court that establishes, for the first time in constitutional jurisprudence (there had been no case on this before), the relevance of parliamentary control of the outgoing Governments, consolidating an understanding of control, in the democratic State, and of parliamentary control, in our form of Government, which had been sustaining the most solvent doctrine. With regard to the Judgment, the re-examination of the competences of the acting Governments is proposed to accommodate them to the ddemands of the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Derecho Constitucional\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"267-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Derecho Constitucional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.119.09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Derecho Constitucional","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.119.09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

espanolEste工作探讨了有重要的宪法法院的判决来建立,首次宪法判例(之前从没任何情况都了解它),有针对性的控制的议会政府职能,巩固一个控制、democratico状况的理解和控制议会,我们的政府形式的辞藻来高举理论更薄。关于这一判决,建议审查现任政府的权力,使其符合目前的要求。EnglishThis work非洲an important Judgment of Constitutional Court that,问题宪法(编辑部there for the first time in case on this之前),没有受到《议会的control of the outgoing政府,consolidating an understanding of control in the democratic State, and of议会控制,in our form of Government), which采取sustaining the most solvent .。关于判决,建议重新审查现政府的权限,以便使它们符合现政府的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El Gobierno en funciones: su ámbito competencial y su control parlamentario (comentario a la STC 124/2018, de 14 de noviembre)
espanolEste trabajo analiza una importante sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional que viene a establecer, por primera vez en la jurisprudencia constitucional (antes no se habia dado ningun caso acerca de ello), la pertinencia del control parlamentario de los Gobiernos en funciones, consolidando un entendimiento del control, en el Estado democratico, y del control parlamentario, en nuestra forma de gobierno, que habia venido sosteniendo la doctrina mas solvente. A proposito de la sentencia, se propone el reexamen de las competencias de los Gobiernos en funciones para acomodarlas a las exigencias del presente. EnglishThis work analyses an important Judgment of the Constitutional Court that establishes, for the first time in constitutional jurisprudence (there had been no case on this before), the relevance of parliamentary control of the outgoing Governments, consolidating an understanding of control, in the democratic State, and of parliamentary control, in our form of Government, which had been sustaining the most solvent doctrine. With regard to the Judgment, the re-examination of the competences of the acting Governments is proposed to accommodate them to the ddemands of the present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信