探究数学效能感与数学效能感差异的程度与方向是否影响数学焦虑

Wang Xi li, Li Xue Liu, Mu Xia
{"title":"探究数学效能感与数学效能感差异的程度与方向是否影响数学焦虑","authors":"Wang Xi li, Li Xue Liu, Mu Xia","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2022.1041662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A questionnaire survey was used to study the effect of the discrepancy between perceived and actual mathematical efficacy (discrepancy in mathematical efficacy) on mathematics anxiety, and the moderating effect of bias in mathematical efficacy estimation. A total of 582 grade 1 students in seniors high school in Nanning with an average age of 16 and 489 grade 2 students in seniors high school with an average age of 17 were selected. The results confirmed that (1) mathematics anxiety was significantly negatively correlated with mathematics efficacy, and significantly positively correlated with greater discrepancy between perceived and actual mathematics efficacy. (2) Variation in mathematics efficacy was much greater, given underestimation rather than overestimation of efficacy. Further, mathematics anxiety was significantly greater, given underestimation vs. overestimation of efficacy. (3) Discrepancy in perceived vs. actual mathematical efficacy positively predicted mathematics anxiety, and was moderated by bias in the estimation of mathematical ability. In the first-grade 1 students, mathematics anxiety was predicted by underestimation but not overestimation of efficacy.","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of whether the extent and orientation of the discrepancy in perceived and actual mathematical efficacy affects mathematical anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Wang Xi li, Li Xue Liu, Mu Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frcha.2022.1041662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A questionnaire survey was used to study the effect of the discrepancy between perceived and actual mathematical efficacy (discrepancy in mathematical efficacy) on mathematics anxiety, and the moderating effect of bias in mathematical efficacy estimation. A total of 582 grade 1 students in seniors high school in Nanning with an average age of 16 and 489 grade 2 students in seniors high school with an average age of 17 were selected. The results confirmed that (1) mathematics anxiety was significantly negatively correlated with mathematics efficacy, and significantly positively correlated with greater discrepancy between perceived and actual mathematics efficacy. (2) Variation in mathematics efficacy was much greater, given underestimation rather than overestimation of efficacy. Further, mathematics anxiety was significantly greater, given underestimation vs. overestimation of efficacy. (3) Discrepancy in perceived vs. actual mathematical efficacy positively predicted mathematics anxiety, and was moderated by bias in the estimation of mathematical ability. In the first-grade 1 students, mathematics anxiety was predicted by underestimation but not overestimation of efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2022.1041662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2022.1041662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用问卷调查的方法,研究数学效能感的感知与实际差异(数学效能差)对数学焦虑的影响,以及数学效能估计偏差的调节作用。南宁市高中一年级学生582名,平均年龄16岁;高中二年级学生489名,平均年龄17岁。结果证实:(1)数学焦虑与数学效能显著负相关,与数学效能感知与实际差异显著正相关。(2)在低估而非高估数学效能的情况下,数学效能的差异要大得多。此外,考虑到对效能的低估与高估,数学焦虑显著更大。(3)数学效能感与实际效能感的差异正向预测数学焦虑,并受数学能力估计偏差的调节。一年级学生的数学焦虑可通过低估效能来预测,但不能通过高估效能来预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An exploration of whether the extent and orientation of the discrepancy in perceived and actual mathematical efficacy affects mathematical anxiety
A questionnaire survey was used to study the effect of the discrepancy between perceived and actual mathematical efficacy (discrepancy in mathematical efficacy) on mathematics anxiety, and the moderating effect of bias in mathematical efficacy estimation. A total of 582 grade 1 students in seniors high school in Nanning with an average age of 16 and 489 grade 2 students in seniors high school with an average age of 17 were selected. The results confirmed that (1) mathematics anxiety was significantly negatively correlated with mathematics efficacy, and significantly positively correlated with greater discrepancy between perceived and actual mathematics efficacy. (2) Variation in mathematics efficacy was much greater, given underestimation rather than overestimation of efficacy. Further, mathematics anxiety was significantly greater, given underestimation vs. overestimation of efficacy. (3) Discrepancy in perceived vs. actual mathematical efficacy positively predicted mathematics anxiety, and was moderated by bias in the estimation of mathematical ability. In the first-grade 1 students, mathematics anxiety was predicted by underestimation but not overestimation of efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信