GC-MS/MS提取香料过敏原的比较研究

IF 0.4 Q4 SPECTROSCOPY
I. Lee, J. Ahn, Bogsoon Kim, Deukmo Chung
{"title":"GC-MS/MS提取香料过敏原的比较研究","authors":"I. Lee, J. Ahn, Bogsoon Kim, Deukmo Chung","doi":"10.5478/MSL.2017.8.1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Products containing any one or more of 26 fragrance allergens likely to cause contact allergies, are required under the 2008 domestic cosmetic law to be labeled when their concentrations exceed a certain range. This study focuses on the comparison and development of analytical methods based on headspace-solid phase micro extraction (HS-SPME) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) methods followed by GC-MS/MS for 24 of the fragrance allergens excepting for two natural materials in water samples. Using the developed HS-SPME method, 15 of the 24 fragrance allergens were analyzed and 9 compounds which have relatively low logKOW values (below about 2.5) were not extracted, and the correlation coefficient (r2) of the calibration curve for quantification showed linearity of 0.9969 or more, and the method detection limits (MDL) and the limits of quantification (LOQ) were 0.078 ~ 0.582 μg/L and 0.261 ~ 1.940 μg/L, respectively. In the case of using the optimized LLE method, all 24 fragrance allergens were analyzed, and the correlation coefficient (r2) of the calibration curve for quantification showed linearity of 0.9957 or more, MDL and LOQ were 0.020 ~ 0.138 μg/L and 0.065 ~ 0.440 μg/L, respectively.","PeriodicalId":18238,"journal":{"name":"Mass Spectrometry Letters","volume":"40 1","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Extracting Fragrance Allergens by GC-MS/MS\",\"authors\":\"I. Lee, J. Ahn, Bogsoon Kim, Deukmo Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.5478/MSL.2017.8.1.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Products containing any one or more of 26 fragrance allergens likely to cause contact allergies, are required under the 2008 domestic cosmetic law to be labeled when their concentrations exceed a certain range. This study focuses on the comparison and development of analytical methods based on headspace-solid phase micro extraction (HS-SPME) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) methods followed by GC-MS/MS for 24 of the fragrance allergens excepting for two natural materials in water samples. Using the developed HS-SPME method, 15 of the 24 fragrance allergens were analyzed and 9 compounds which have relatively low logKOW values (below about 2.5) were not extracted, and the correlation coefficient (r2) of the calibration curve for quantification showed linearity of 0.9969 or more, and the method detection limits (MDL) and the limits of quantification (LOQ) were 0.078 ~ 0.582 μg/L and 0.261 ~ 1.940 μg/L, respectively. In the case of using the optimized LLE method, all 24 fragrance allergens were analyzed, and the correlation coefficient (r2) of the calibration curve for quantification showed linearity of 0.9957 or more, MDL and LOQ were 0.020 ~ 0.138 μg/L and 0.065 ~ 0.440 μg/L, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mass Spectrometry Letters\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"18-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mass Spectrometry Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2017.8.1.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPECTROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mass Spectrometry Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2017.8.1.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

根据2008年的国内化妆品法,含有26种可能引起接触性过敏的香氛过敏原中的任何一种或多种的产品,当其浓度超过一定范围时,都需要标注。本研究对水样中除两种天然物质外的24种香精过敏原进行了顶空固相微萃取法(HS-SPME)和液液萃取法(LLE) - GC-MS/MS分析方法的比较与开发。采用所建立的HS-SPME方法,分析了24种香精过敏原中的15种,未提取logKOW值较低(低于2.5左右)的9种化合物,定量校准曲线相关系数(r2)线性关系在0.9969及以上,方法检出限(MDL)和定量限(LOQ)分别为0.078 ~ 0.582 μg/L和0.261 ~ 1.940 μg/L。采用优化后的LLE法对24种香精过敏原进行分析,定量校准曲线的相关系数r2在0.9957及以上的线性范围内,MDL和LOQ分别为0.020 ~ 0.138 μg/L和0.065 ~ 0.440 μg/L。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Extracting Fragrance Allergens by GC-MS/MS
Products containing any one or more of 26 fragrance allergens likely to cause contact allergies, are required under the 2008 domestic cosmetic law to be labeled when their concentrations exceed a certain range. This study focuses on the comparison and development of analytical methods based on headspace-solid phase micro extraction (HS-SPME) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) methods followed by GC-MS/MS for 24 of the fragrance allergens excepting for two natural materials in water samples. Using the developed HS-SPME method, 15 of the 24 fragrance allergens were analyzed and 9 compounds which have relatively low logKOW values (below about 2.5) were not extracted, and the correlation coefficient (r2) of the calibration curve for quantification showed linearity of 0.9969 or more, and the method detection limits (MDL) and the limits of quantification (LOQ) were 0.078 ~ 0.582 μg/L and 0.261 ~ 1.940 μg/L, respectively. In the case of using the optimized LLE method, all 24 fragrance allergens were analyzed, and the correlation coefficient (r2) of the calibration curve for quantification showed linearity of 0.9957 or more, MDL and LOQ were 0.020 ~ 0.138 μg/L and 0.065 ~ 0.440 μg/L, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信