{"title":"逻辑结构","authors":"T. Barrero","doi":"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2013.687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESUMEN: En este articulo discuto la semantica de Davidson para oraciones de accion a partir de su analisis de las preposiciones como predicados de sucesos indi viduales, y senalo ciertas dificultades logico-linguisticas conectadas con la pretension interpretativa y la indiferencia referencial de dicha propuesta. Dejando de lado el presupuesto de la individualidad de los sucesos e inspirado en Evans y Grice, pro pongo una semantica interpretativa diferente para esos casos y argumento en favor de una tesis constructivista de los sucesos en el discurso de accion. PALABRAS CLAVE: oraciones de accion, sucesos y preposiciones, forma logica y semantica interpretativa SUMMARY: By considering Davidson's analysis of prepositions as defining individual events predicates, I argue against his semantics for action sentences and stress some logico-linguistic puzzles concerning both the interpretive pretension and the referential indifference of this proposal. Inspired by Evans as well as by Grice, I advance another interpretive semantics for those cases which does not take as assumption the individual character of events and argue for a constructivist approach to events in action discourse.","PeriodicalId":43820,"journal":{"name":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","volume":"19 1","pages":"3-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACCION Y CONSTRUCCION LOGICA\",\"authors\":\"T. Barrero\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2013.687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RESUMEN: En este articulo discuto la semantica de Davidson para oraciones de accion a partir de su analisis de las preposiciones como predicados de sucesos indi viduales, y senalo ciertas dificultades logico-linguisticas conectadas con la pretension interpretativa y la indiferencia referencial de dicha propuesta. Dejando de lado el presupuesto de la individualidad de los sucesos e inspirado en Evans y Grice, pro pongo una semantica interpretativa diferente para esos casos y argumento en favor de una tesis constructivista de los sucesos en el discurso de accion. PALABRAS CLAVE: oraciones de accion, sucesos y preposiciones, forma logica y semantica interpretativa SUMMARY: By considering Davidson's analysis of prepositions as defining individual events predicates, I argue against his semantics for action sentences and stress some logico-linguistic puzzles concerning both the interpretive pretension and the referential indifference of this proposal. Inspired by Evans as well as by Grice, I advance another interpretive semantics for those cases which does not take as assumption the individual character of events and argue for a constructivist approach to events in action discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"3-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2013.687\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2013.687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
摘要:本研究的主要目的是探讨西班牙语作为一种语言的地位,以及西班牙语作为一种语言的地位,以及西班牙语作为一种语言的地位,以及西班牙语作为一种语言的地位。撇开事件个性的假设不谈,受Evans和Grice的启发,我为这些案例提出了不同的解释语义,并为行动话语中的事件建构主义论点辩护。关键词:祷告,行动,事件和preposiciones逻辑形式和解释性semantica SUMMARY: By Davidson虽然ngok analysis of prepositions defining个人events predicates I争辩的行为semantics for action服刑和压力some logico-linguistic难题关于both the interpretive福and the database indifference of this提案。Inspired by埃文斯as well as by Grice I预付款another interpretive semantics花有哪些没有带as假定个人查阅of events and争辩for a constructivist approach to events in action discourse。
RESUMEN: En este articulo discuto la semantica de Davidson para oraciones de accion a partir de su analisis de las preposiciones como predicados de sucesos indi viduales, y senalo ciertas dificultades logico-linguisticas conectadas con la pretension interpretativa y la indiferencia referencial de dicha propuesta. Dejando de lado el presupuesto de la individualidad de los sucesos e inspirado en Evans y Grice, pro pongo una semantica interpretativa diferente para esos casos y argumento en favor de una tesis constructivista de los sucesos en el discurso de accion. PALABRAS CLAVE: oraciones de accion, sucesos y preposiciones, forma logica y semantica interpretativa SUMMARY: By considering Davidson's analysis of prepositions as defining individual events predicates, I argue against his semantics for action sentences and stress some logico-linguistic puzzles concerning both the interpretive pretension and the referential indifference of this proposal. Inspired by Evans as well as by Grice, I advance another interpretive semantics for those cases which does not take as assumption the individual character of events and argue for a constructivist approach to events in action discourse.