心血管手术后SOFA评分在重症患者住院死亡率中的应用

Xiaoyu Liu, Chenglong Li, N. Liu, X. Hou
{"title":"心血管手术后SOFA评分在重症患者住院死亡率中的应用","authors":"Xiaoyu Liu, Chenglong Li, N. Liu, X. Hou","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nEstablish the post cardiovascular surgery SOFA score(pcvsSOFA)based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA)score to evaluate the severity and prognosis of patients after cardiovascular surgery. \n \n \nMethods \n3 872 consecutive patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery and stayed in ICU more than 24 hours between July 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed to establish a derivation cohort. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify the predictors in the pcvsSOFA. And the validity of the new model was evaluated in the derivation cohort and validation cohort. \n \n \nResults \nRespiratory system score, coagulation system score, nervous system score and renal system score on the first day of ICU, Emergency surgery and re-surgery were risk factors and established the pcvsSOFA. The total score of pcvsSOFA was 20 point and was divided into four classes, namely class Ⅰ(pcvsSOFA-score: 1-5), class Ⅱ(pcvsSOFA-score: 6-10), class Ⅲ(pcvsSOFA-score: 11-15) and class Ⅳ(pcvsSOFA-score: 16-20)with their corresponding predicted mortality 0.9%(n=2 317), 5.7%(n=1 367), 26.8%(n=184), and 64.2%(n=4) in the derivation cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve(AUC)was 0.864(95%CI: 0.837-0.892), and the integrated discriminant improvement(IDI) was 0.035.In the validation cohort, AUC(pcvsSOFA)= 0.832(95%CI: 0.735-0.928), IDI=0.211. The AUC of SOFA, APACHE Ⅱ and SAPS Ⅱ was 0.771, 0.793 and 0.721 respectively. \n \n \nConclusion \nCompared with the SOFA score, pcvsSOFA could be a better tool to assess the prognosis of critical patients in the early postoperative stage. \n \n \nKey words: \nSOFA score Cardiovascular surgery Outcome","PeriodicalId":10181,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The application of post cardiovascular surgery SOFA score in hospital mortality in severe patients\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Liu, Chenglong Li, N. Liu, X. Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nEstablish the post cardiovascular surgery SOFA score(pcvsSOFA)based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA)score to evaluate the severity and prognosis of patients after cardiovascular surgery. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\n3 872 consecutive patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery and stayed in ICU more than 24 hours between July 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed to establish a derivation cohort. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify the predictors in the pcvsSOFA. And the validity of the new model was evaluated in the derivation cohort and validation cohort. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nRespiratory system score, coagulation system score, nervous system score and renal system score on the first day of ICU, Emergency surgery and re-surgery were risk factors and established the pcvsSOFA. The total score of pcvsSOFA was 20 point and was divided into four classes, namely class Ⅰ(pcvsSOFA-score: 1-5), class Ⅱ(pcvsSOFA-score: 6-10), class Ⅲ(pcvsSOFA-score: 11-15) and class Ⅳ(pcvsSOFA-score: 16-20)with their corresponding predicted mortality 0.9%(n=2 317), 5.7%(n=1 367), 26.8%(n=184), and 64.2%(n=4) in the derivation cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve(AUC)was 0.864(95%CI: 0.837-0.892), and the integrated discriminant improvement(IDI) was 0.035.In the validation cohort, AUC(pcvsSOFA)= 0.832(95%CI: 0.735-0.928), IDI=0.211. The AUC of SOFA, APACHE Ⅱ and SAPS Ⅱ was 0.771, 0.793 and 0.721 respectively. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nCompared with the SOFA score, pcvsSOFA could be a better tool to assess the prognosis of critical patients in the early postoperative stage. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nSOFA score Cardiovascular surgery Outcome\",\"PeriodicalId\":10181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.09.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.09.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的以序贯器官衰竭(SOFA)评分为基础,建立心血管术后SOFA评分(pcvsSOFA),评价心血管术后患者的严重程度及预后。方法回顾性分析2015年7月至2017年12月3 872例连续接受心血管手术且在ICU住院时间超过24小时的患者,建立衍生队列。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归来确定pcvsSOFA的预测因子。并在推导队列和验证队列中对新模型的有效性进行了评价。结果ICU第一天呼吸系统评分、凝血系统评分、神经系统评分、肾系统评分、急诊手术及再手术评分为危险因素,建立了pcvsSOFA。pcvsSOFA总分为20分,分为Ⅰ(pcvsSOFA-score: 1-5)、Ⅱ(pcvsSOFA-score: 6-10)、Ⅲ(pcvsSOFA-score: 11-15)和Ⅳ(pcvsSOFA-score: 16-20) 4个类,衍生队列预测死亡率分别为0.9%(n=2 317)、5.7%(n=1 367)、26.8%(n=184)和64.2%(n=4)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.864(95%CI: 0.837 ~ 0.892),综合判别改善(IDI)为0.035。在验证队列中,AUC(pcvsSOFA)= 0.832(95%CI: 0.735 ~ 0.928), IDI=0.211。SOFA、APACHEⅡ和SAPSⅡ的AUC分别为0.771、0.793和0.721。结论与SOFA评分相比,pcvsSOFA评分能更好地评价术后早期危重患者的预后。关键词:SOFA评分;心血管手术;预后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The application of post cardiovascular surgery SOFA score in hospital mortality in severe patients
Objective Establish the post cardiovascular surgery SOFA score(pcvsSOFA)based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA)score to evaluate the severity and prognosis of patients after cardiovascular surgery. Methods 3 872 consecutive patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery and stayed in ICU more than 24 hours between July 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed to establish a derivation cohort. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify the predictors in the pcvsSOFA. And the validity of the new model was evaluated in the derivation cohort and validation cohort. Results Respiratory system score, coagulation system score, nervous system score and renal system score on the first day of ICU, Emergency surgery and re-surgery were risk factors and established the pcvsSOFA. The total score of pcvsSOFA was 20 point and was divided into four classes, namely class Ⅰ(pcvsSOFA-score: 1-5), class Ⅱ(pcvsSOFA-score: 6-10), class Ⅲ(pcvsSOFA-score: 11-15) and class Ⅳ(pcvsSOFA-score: 16-20)with their corresponding predicted mortality 0.9%(n=2 317), 5.7%(n=1 367), 26.8%(n=184), and 64.2%(n=4) in the derivation cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve(AUC)was 0.864(95%CI: 0.837-0.892), and the integrated discriminant improvement(IDI) was 0.035.In the validation cohort, AUC(pcvsSOFA)= 0.832(95%CI: 0.735-0.928), IDI=0.211. The AUC of SOFA, APACHE Ⅱ and SAPS Ⅱ was 0.771, 0.793 and 0.721 respectively. Conclusion Compared with the SOFA score, pcvsSOFA could be a better tool to assess the prognosis of critical patients in the early postoperative stage. Key words: SOFA score Cardiovascular surgery Outcome
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信