COVID-19期间美国人对疫苗的犹豫和对精英知识的态度

IF 1.7 3区社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY

Critical Sociology Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1177/08969205231180267

Jeremiah Morelock, Andressa Michelotti, Ly Hoang Minh Uyen

{"title":"COVID-19期间美国人对疫苗的犹豫和对精英知识的态度","authors":"Jeremiah Morelock, Andressa Michelotti, Ly Hoang Minh Uyen","doi":"10.1177/08969205231180267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To be effective, the battle against COVID-19 and other pandemics must address the social dimensions of the crisis. The objective of this study was to assess whether negative attitudes toward elite knowledge were associated with vaccine hesitancy in the United States during COVID-19. Attitudes toward elite knowledge were assessed using three measures: (a) the Epistemological Style Inventory’s ‘naive realism’ subscale, (b) a measure about supporting education to foster understanding of politics, and (c) a populism scale. Vaccine hesitancy was measured using a 9-item adaptation of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale used by the World Health Organization. Multiple regression results revealed that naïve realism (.184, p < .001) and populism (.356, p < .001) were positively associated with vaccine hesitancy, while support of political education (−.296, p < .001) was negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy. These results indicate that to fully understand vaccine hesitancy, the role of attitudes toward elite knowledge must be considered.","PeriodicalId":47686,"journal":{"name":"Critical Sociology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccine Hesitancy and Attitudes Toward Elite Knowledge in the United States During COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Jeremiah Morelock, Andressa Michelotti, Ly Hoang Minh Uyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08969205231180267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To be effective, the battle against COVID-19 and other pandemics must address the social dimensions of the crisis. The objective of this study was to assess whether negative attitudes toward elite knowledge were associated with vaccine hesitancy in the United States during COVID-19. Attitudes toward elite knowledge were assessed using three measures: (a) the Epistemological Style Inventory’s ‘naive realism’ subscale, (b) a measure about supporting education to foster understanding of politics, and (c) a populism scale. Vaccine hesitancy was measured using a 9-item adaptation of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale used by the World Health Organization. Multiple regression results revealed that naïve realism (.184, p < .001) and populism (.356, p < .001) were positively associated with vaccine hesitancy, while support of political education (−.296, p < .001) was negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy. These results indicate that to fully understand vaccine hesitancy, the role of attitudes toward elite knowledge must be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Sociology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231180267\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231180267","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

要取得成效，抗击COVID-19和其他大流行病的斗争必须解决危机的社会层面。本研究的目的是评估对精英知识的负面态度是否与美国在COVID-19期间的疫苗犹豫有关。对精英知识的态度使用三个指标进行评估:(a)认识论风格量表的“朴素现实主义”子量表，(b)关于支持教育以促进对政治的理解的措施，以及(c)民粹主义量表。疫苗犹豫使用世界卫生组织使用的疫苗犹豫量表的9个项目进行测量。多元回归结果显示naïve现实主义(。184, p < 0.001)和民粹主义(p < 0.001)。356, p < .001)与疫苗犹豫正相关，而支持政治教育(-。296, p < 0.001)与疫苗犹豫负相关。这些结果表明，要充分了解疫苗犹豫，必须考虑对精英知识的态度的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Vaccine Hesitancy and Attitudes Toward Elite Knowledge in the United States During COVID-19

To be effective, the battle against COVID-19 and other pandemics must address the social dimensions of the crisis. The objective of this study was to assess whether negative attitudes toward elite knowledge were associated with vaccine hesitancy in the United States during COVID-19. Attitudes toward elite knowledge were assessed using three measures: (a) the Epistemological Style Inventory’s ‘naive realism’ subscale, (b) a measure about supporting education to foster understanding of politics, and (c) a populism scale. Vaccine hesitancy was measured using a 9-item adaptation of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale used by the World Health Organization. Multiple regression results revealed that naïve realism (.184, p < .001) and populism (.356, p < .001) were positively associated with vaccine hesitancy, while support of political education (−.296, p < .001) was negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy. These results indicate that to fully understand vaccine hesitancy, the role of attitudes toward elite knowledge must be considered.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Sociology SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

5.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Sociology is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research. Originally appearing as The Insurgent Sociologist, it grew out of the tumultuous times of the late 1960s and was a by-product of the "Sociology Liberation Movement" which erupted at the 1969 meetings of the American Sociological Association. At first publishing work mainly within the broadest boundaries of the Marxist tradition, over the past decade the journal has been home to articles informed by post-modern, feminist, cultural and other perspectives that critically evaluate the workings of the capitalist system and its impact on the world.