“反对私有化、预设和庇护”:Frank van Klingeren对开放式建筑的挑战

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Ecem Sarıçayır
{"title":"“反对私有化、预设和庇护”:Frank van Klingeren对开放式建筑的挑战","authors":"Ecem Sarıçayır","doi":"10.1080/13602365.2022.2086151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper traces the history of two community centres, De Meerpaal (1965–1967) and Het Karregat (1973), designed by the Dutch architect Frank van Klingeren. After situating his work within the historical context of the 1960s and 1970s architectural developments in the Netherlands, Van Klingeren’s architectural practice as demonstrated through his community centres is analysed through the conceptual framework of ‘open architecture’ proposed by Esra Akcan. Although they received praise from national and international commentators alike, Van Klingeren’s open community centres also met resistance from government officials and journalists, as well as users of the buildings. The focus of investigation is on Van Klingeren’s struggle against the planned renovation of De Meerpaal and his decision to file an injunction claiming his right of authorship over the building in a final attempt to safeguard the building’s openness. This paper draws attention to the contradictions of Van Klingeren’s open architecture and argues that his attempt to protect De Meerpaal through court action is indicative of the limitations of his open architectural practice. In doing so, this paper explores the question of architectural authorship in discussions on open architecture.","PeriodicalId":44236,"journal":{"name":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Against the privatised, the preconditioned, and the asylum-like’: Frank van Klingeren’s challenge to open architecture\",\"authors\":\"Ecem Sarıçayır\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13602365.2022.2086151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper traces the history of two community centres, De Meerpaal (1965–1967) and Het Karregat (1973), designed by the Dutch architect Frank van Klingeren. After situating his work within the historical context of the 1960s and 1970s architectural developments in the Netherlands, Van Klingeren’s architectural practice as demonstrated through his community centres is analysed through the conceptual framework of ‘open architecture’ proposed by Esra Akcan. Although they received praise from national and international commentators alike, Van Klingeren’s open community centres also met resistance from government officials and journalists, as well as users of the buildings. The focus of investigation is on Van Klingeren’s struggle against the planned renovation of De Meerpaal and his decision to file an injunction claiming his right of authorship over the building in a final attempt to safeguard the building’s openness. This paper draws attention to the contradictions of Van Klingeren’s open architecture and argues that his attempt to protect De Meerpaal through court action is indicative of the limitations of his open architectural practice. In doing so, this paper explores the question of architectural authorship in discussions on open architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2022.2086151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2022.2086151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文追溯了两个社区中心的历史,De Meerpaal(1965-1967)和Het Karregat(1973),由荷兰建筑师Frank van Klingeren设计。在将他的作品置于荷兰20世纪60年代和70年代建筑发展的历史背景之后,Van Klingeren的建筑实践通过Esra Akcan提出的“开放式建筑”概念框架进行分析,通过他的社区中心展示。尽管这些开放的社区中心得到了国内外评论家的一致好评,但它们也遭到了政府官员、记者以及建筑使用者的抵制。调查的重点是Van Klingeren反对De Meerpaal计划翻新的斗争,以及他决定提交禁制令,声称他对该建筑拥有作者的权利,最后试图保护该建筑的开放性。本文将关注Van Klingeren开放式建筑的矛盾,并认为他试图通过法院诉讼来保护De Meerpaal,这表明了他开放式建筑实践的局限性。在此过程中,本文探讨了开放式架构讨论中的架构作者问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Against the privatised, the preconditioned, and the asylum-like’: Frank van Klingeren’s challenge to open architecture
This paper traces the history of two community centres, De Meerpaal (1965–1967) and Het Karregat (1973), designed by the Dutch architect Frank van Klingeren. After situating his work within the historical context of the 1960s and 1970s architectural developments in the Netherlands, Van Klingeren’s architectural practice as demonstrated through his community centres is analysed through the conceptual framework of ‘open architecture’ proposed by Esra Akcan. Although they received praise from national and international commentators alike, Van Klingeren’s open community centres also met resistance from government officials and journalists, as well as users of the buildings. The focus of investigation is on Van Klingeren’s struggle against the planned renovation of De Meerpaal and his decision to file an injunction claiming his right of authorship over the building in a final attempt to safeguard the building’s openness. This paper draws attention to the contradictions of Van Klingeren’s open architecture and argues that his attempt to protect De Meerpaal through court action is indicative of the limitations of his open architectural practice. In doing so, this paper explores the question of architectural authorship in discussions on open architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE is a biannual refereed publication of the Middle East Technical University published every June and December, and offers a comprehensive range of articles contributing to the development of knowledge in man-environment relations, design and planning. METU JFA accepts submissions in English or Turkish, and assumes that the manuscripts received by the Journal have not been published previously or that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. METU JFA invites theory, research and history papers on the following fields and related interdisciplinary topics: architecture and urbanism, planning and design, restoration and preservation, buildings and building systems technologies and design, product design and technologies. Prospective manuscripts for publication in these fields may constitute; 1. Original theoretical papers; 2. Original research papers; 3. Documents and critical expositions; 4. Applied studies related to professional practice; 5. Educational works, commentaries and reviews; 6. Book reviews Manuscripts, in English or Turkish, have to be approved by the Editorial Board, which are then forwarded to Referees before acceptance for publication. The Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. It is assumed that the manuscripts received by the Journal are not sent to other journals for publication purposes and have not been previously published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信