批判性地看更大的图景:美国语言和技术的宏观层面话语

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
CALICO Journal Pub Date : 2018-08-25 DOI:10.1558/CJ.35022
Emily A. Hellmich
{"title":"批判性地看更大的图景:美国语言和技术的宏观层面话语","authors":"Emily A. Hellmich","doi":"10.1558/CJ.35022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its numerous benefits and potentialities for language learning and teaching, digital technology can also play a role in creating and maintaining inequality (Kern, 2014; Selwyn, 2013). While critical CALL often focuses on micro-level issues and contexts, macro-level perspectives, including discourses, are also essential to consider (Helm, 2015): From ecological and language-as-discourse perspectives, macro-level discourses have the potential to impact and shape CALL practices and contexts (Blin, 2016; Blommaert, 2005). Using critical discourse analysis methods (Blommaert, 2005; Fairclough, 2001), this article takes the 2017 American Academy of Arts and Sciences (AAAS) report, \"America's Languages: Investing in Language Education for the 21st Century,\" as a window into macro-level discourses of language and technology in American society today. Findings reveal a series of interrelated frames and scales that, taken together, suggest a neoliberal discourse that positioned language, technology, and ultimately CALL as tools to enhance national competitiveness on a global marketplace. The article concludes with implications of these findings for the CALL field.","PeriodicalId":46819,"journal":{"name":"CALICO Journal","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Look at the Bigger Picture: Macro-Level Discourses of Language and Technology in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Emily A. Hellmich\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/CJ.35022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite its numerous benefits and potentialities for language learning and teaching, digital technology can also play a role in creating and maintaining inequality (Kern, 2014; Selwyn, 2013). While critical CALL often focuses on micro-level issues and contexts, macro-level perspectives, including discourses, are also essential to consider (Helm, 2015): From ecological and language-as-discourse perspectives, macro-level discourses have the potential to impact and shape CALL practices and contexts (Blin, 2016; Blommaert, 2005). Using critical discourse analysis methods (Blommaert, 2005; Fairclough, 2001), this article takes the 2017 American Academy of Arts and Sciences (AAAS) report, \\\"America's Languages: Investing in Language Education for the 21st Century,\\\" as a window into macro-level discourses of language and technology in American society today. Findings reveal a series of interrelated frames and scales that, taken together, suggest a neoliberal discourse that positioned language, technology, and ultimately CALL as tools to enhance national competitiveness on a global marketplace. The article concludes with implications of these findings for the CALL field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CALICO Journal\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CALICO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/CJ.35022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALICO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/CJ.35022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

尽管数字技术对语言学习和教学有许多好处和潜力,但它也可以在创造和维持不平等方面发挥作用(Kern, 2014;塞尔温,2013)。虽然批判性呼叫通常关注微观层面的问题和语境,但宏观层面的视角,包括话语,也必须考虑(Helm, 2015):从生态和语言作为话语的角度来看,宏观层面的话语有可能影响和塑造呼叫实践和语境(Blin, 2016;Blommaert, 2005)。运用批评话语分析方法(Blommaert, 2005;Fairclough, 2001),本文以2017年美国艺术与科学学院(AAAS)的报告“美国的语言:投资于21世纪的语言教育”为窗口,作为当今美国社会语言和技术宏观层面话语的窗口。研究结果揭示了一系列相互关联的框架和尺度,这些框架和尺度结合在一起,表明了一种新自由主义话语,它将语言、技术以及最终的CALL定位为提高国家在全球市场上竞争力的工具。文章总结了这些发现对CALL领域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Look at the Bigger Picture: Macro-Level Discourses of Language and Technology in the United States
Despite its numerous benefits and potentialities for language learning and teaching, digital technology can also play a role in creating and maintaining inequality (Kern, 2014; Selwyn, 2013). While critical CALL often focuses on micro-level issues and contexts, macro-level perspectives, including discourses, are also essential to consider (Helm, 2015): From ecological and language-as-discourse perspectives, macro-level discourses have the potential to impact and shape CALL practices and contexts (Blin, 2016; Blommaert, 2005). Using critical discourse analysis methods (Blommaert, 2005; Fairclough, 2001), this article takes the 2017 American Academy of Arts and Sciences (AAAS) report, "America's Languages: Investing in Language Education for the 21st Century," as a window into macro-level discourses of language and technology in American society today. Findings reveal a series of interrelated frames and scales that, taken together, suggest a neoliberal discourse that positioned language, technology, and ultimately CALL as tools to enhance national competitiveness on a global marketplace. The article concludes with implications of these findings for the CALL field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CALICO Journal
CALICO Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信