研究、政治参与和剥夺:美洲和亚洲的土著、农民和城市贫民运动

Q4 Social Sciences
Zachary King
{"title":"研究、政治参与和剥夺:美洲和亚洲的土著、农民和城市贫民运动","authors":"Zachary King","doi":"10.1080/08854300.2021.1977597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a social scientist with long-running political commitments, the questionof howmywork contributes to projects of social justice and liberation is important to me. Concerns about the contribution of one’s research to liberatory political projects are especially central for researchers who deal directly with people engaged in political struggle in social locations that are distant from centers of power, especially academic institutions in the globalNorth. For anyonewhowants to examine theways people seek to build relations of solidarity across social locations with differential access to institutional power, this book provides a diverse array of potential strategies, all richly detailed with personal reflection and practical advice. Research, Political Engagement, and Dispossession delivers what it promises, building beyond the Participatory Action Research (PAR) focus of the editors’ 2009 collection to offer additional methodological modelsdirectly fromresearchersputting thesemodels intopractice incollaborationwith socialmovement activists around theworld. Readers are all but guaranteed to learn something thatwill improve their relationship to the people and movements they engage with in projects of emancipatory knowledge production. This book explains how PAR has at times been limited, coopted, and de-politicized, as described by co-editor Steven Jordan in his chapter in the 2009 collection. Co-editor Dip Kapoor offers Anticolonial Participatory Action Research (APAR) in his own chapter of this latest book, grounding its approach in an explicit critique of colonial relations – in contrast to the approach of non-governmental organization (NGO), government, and traditional researcher-led projects that often use a veneer of participation to manufacture consent for development projects that replicate and deepen longstanding power inequities. Kapoor grounds his method not only in the Freirean philosophy","PeriodicalId":40061,"journal":{"name":"Socialism and Democracy","volume":"111 1","pages":"384 - 386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research, Political Engagement, and Dispossession: Indigenous, Peasant, and Urban Poor Activisms in the Americas and Asia\",\"authors\":\"Zachary King\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08854300.2021.1977597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a social scientist with long-running political commitments, the questionof howmywork contributes to projects of social justice and liberation is important to me. Concerns about the contribution of one’s research to liberatory political projects are especially central for researchers who deal directly with people engaged in political struggle in social locations that are distant from centers of power, especially academic institutions in the globalNorth. For anyonewhowants to examine theways people seek to build relations of solidarity across social locations with differential access to institutional power, this book provides a diverse array of potential strategies, all richly detailed with personal reflection and practical advice. Research, Political Engagement, and Dispossession delivers what it promises, building beyond the Participatory Action Research (PAR) focus of the editors’ 2009 collection to offer additional methodological modelsdirectly fromresearchersputting thesemodels intopractice incollaborationwith socialmovement activists around theworld. Readers are all but guaranteed to learn something thatwill improve their relationship to the people and movements they engage with in projects of emancipatory knowledge production. This book explains how PAR has at times been limited, coopted, and de-politicized, as described by co-editor Steven Jordan in his chapter in the 2009 collection. Co-editor Dip Kapoor offers Anticolonial Participatory Action Research (APAR) in his own chapter of this latest book, grounding its approach in an explicit critique of colonial relations – in contrast to the approach of non-governmental organization (NGO), government, and traditional researcher-led projects that often use a veneer of participation to manufacture consent for development projects that replicate and deepen longstanding power inequities. Kapoor grounds his method not only in the Freirean philosophy\",\"PeriodicalId\":40061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"384 - 386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.1977597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialism and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.1977597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一名长期从事政治工作的社会科学家,我的工作如何有助于社会正义和解放的项目,这个问题对我来说很重要。对于那些直接与远离权力中心的社会地区(尤其是全球北方的学术机构)从事政治斗争的人打交道的研究人员来说,关注自己的研究对解放性政治项目的贡献尤其重要。对于任何想要研究人们如何在不同的社会位置、不同的机构权力获取渠道中寻求建立团结关系的人来说,这本书提供了各种各样的潜在策略,所有这些策略都有个人反思和实用建议的丰富细节。《研究、政治参与和剥夺》兑现了它的承诺,超越了编辑们2009年出版的参与性行动研究(PAR)的重点,提供了直接来自研究人员的额外方法模型,并将这些模型与世界各地的社会运动活动家合作付诸实践。读者几乎肯定会学到一些东西,这些东西将改善他们与人民的关系,以及他们在解放知识生产项目中参与的运动。这本书解释了PAR有时是如何被限制、被拉拢和去政治化的,正如联合编辑史蒂文·乔丹在他2009年合集的章节中所描述的那样。联合编辑Dip Kapoor在这本新书中自己的章节中提出了反殖民参与式行动研究(APAR),将其方法建立在对殖民关系的明确批判之上——这与非政府组织(NGO)、政府和传统的研究人员主导的项目的方法形成鲜明对比,后者经常使用参与的表面来制造对复制和深化长期权力不平等的发展项目的同意。卡普尔不仅把他的方法建立在佛氏哲学的基础上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research, Political Engagement, and Dispossession: Indigenous, Peasant, and Urban Poor Activisms in the Americas and Asia
As a social scientist with long-running political commitments, the questionof howmywork contributes to projects of social justice and liberation is important to me. Concerns about the contribution of one’s research to liberatory political projects are especially central for researchers who deal directly with people engaged in political struggle in social locations that are distant from centers of power, especially academic institutions in the globalNorth. For anyonewhowants to examine theways people seek to build relations of solidarity across social locations with differential access to institutional power, this book provides a diverse array of potential strategies, all richly detailed with personal reflection and practical advice. Research, Political Engagement, and Dispossession delivers what it promises, building beyond the Participatory Action Research (PAR) focus of the editors’ 2009 collection to offer additional methodological modelsdirectly fromresearchersputting thesemodels intopractice incollaborationwith socialmovement activists around theworld. Readers are all but guaranteed to learn something thatwill improve their relationship to the people and movements they engage with in projects of emancipatory knowledge production. This book explains how PAR has at times been limited, coopted, and de-politicized, as described by co-editor Steven Jordan in his chapter in the 2009 collection. Co-editor Dip Kapoor offers Anticolonial Participatory Action Research (APAR) in his own chapter of this latest book, grounding its approach in an explicit critique of colonial relations – in contrast to the approach of non-governmental organization (NGO), government, and traditional researcher-led projects that often use a veneer of participation to manufacture consent for development projects that replicate and deepen longstanding power inequities. Kapoor grounds his method not only in the Freirean philosophy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socialism and Democracy
Socialism and Democracy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Socialism and Democracy is committed to showing the continuing relevance of socialist politics and vision. Socialism and Democracy brings together the worlds of scholarship and activism, theory and practice, to examine in depth the core issues and popular movements of our time. The perspective is broadly Marxist, encouraging not only critique of the status quo, but also informed analysis of the many different approaches to bringing about fundamental change, and seeking to integrate issues of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and nationality with the traditional focus on class. Articles reflect many disciplines; our geographical scope is global; authors include activists and independent scholars as well as academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信