大鼠无信号和有信号延迟强化的效果:过程间比较

Q4 Psychology
Kenneth Madrigal, Carlos Flores, Cinthia Hernández
{"title":"大鼠无信号和有信号延迟强化的效果:过程间比较","authors":"Kenneth Madrigal, Carlos Flores, Cinthia Hernández","doi":"10.5514/RMAC.V44.I2.68537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using eight experimentally naive Wistar rats, the effects of immediate, unsignaled and signaled delays of reinforcement on lever-pressing response rates were compared with two different procedures. In the Between-Phases procedure, each experimental condition was presented in three thirty-session consecutive phases; whereas, in the Multiple-Schedule procedure, each experimental condition was correlated with one component of a three-component multiple schedule of reinforcement. Regardless of the procedure used, consistent results were observed, that is, differences in response rates were found when rats were exposed to a delay of reinforcement condition (Signaled or Unsignaled) in contrast to the immediate-reinforcement condition. These results suggest that even when rats are exposed to different conditions in the same session, similar results occur to those found when these conditions are arranged between phases. Similarly, they provide some information regarding the usefulness of employing a multiple schedule to assess the effects of different variables (Immediate, Unsignaled, and Signaled food deliveries) in relatively less time than a between-phases procedure.","PeriodicalId":53598,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECTS OF UNSIGNALED AND SIGNALED DELAYS OF REINFORCEMENT IN RATS: A BETWEEN-PROCEDURES COMPARISON\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Madrigal, Carlos Flores, Cinthia Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.5514/RMAC.V44.I2.68537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using eight experimentally naive Wistar rats, the effects of immediate, unsignaled and signaled delays of reinforcement on lever-pressing response rates were compared with two different procedures. In the Between-Phases procedure, each experimental condition was presented in three thirty-session consecutive phases; whereas, in the Multiple-Schedule procedure, each experimental condition was correlated with one component of a three-component multiple schedule of reinforcement. Regardless of the procedure used, consistent results were observed, that is, differences in response rates were found when rats were exposed to a delay of reinforcement condition (Signaled or Unsignaled) in contrast to the immediate-reinforcement condition. These results suggest that even when rats are exposed to different conditions in the same session, similar results occur to those found when these conditions are arranged between phases. Similarly, they provide some information regarding the usefulness of employing a multiple schedule to assess the effects of different variables (Immediate, Unsignaled, and Signaled food deliveries) in relatively less time than a between-phases procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5514/RMAC.V44.I2.68537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5514/RMAC.V44.I2.68537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用8只实验幼年Wistar大鼠,比较了即时、无信号和有信号延迟强化对杠杆按压反应率的影响。在“阶段间”过程中,每个实验条件分为三个连续的30个阶段;而在多计划过程中,每个实验条件与三分量多重强化计划中的一个分量相关。无论使用何种程序,观察到一致的结果,即当大鼠暴露于延迟强化条件(有信号或无信号)时,与立即强化条件相比,发现反应率存在差异。这些结果表明,即使大鼠在同一时段暴露在不同的条件下,当这些条件被安排在不同的阶段时,也会出现类似的结果。类似地,它们提供了一些信息,说明使用多个时间表在相对较短的时间内评估不同变量(即时、无信号和有信号的食品交付)的效果是否有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECTS OF UNSIGNALED AND SIGNALED DELAYS OF REINFORCEMENT IN RATS: A BETWEEN-PROCEDURES COMPARISON
Using eight experimentally naive Wistar rats, the effects of immediate, unsignaled and signaled delays of reinforcement on lever-pressing response rates were compared with two different procedures. In the Between-Phases procedure, each experimental condition was presented in three thirty-session consecutive phases; whereas, in the Multiple-Schedule procedure, each experimental condition was correlated with one component of a three-component multiple schedule of reinforcement. Regardless of the procedure used, consistent results were observed, that is, differences in response rates were found when rats were exposed to a delay of reinforcement condition (Signaled or Unsignaled) in contrast to the immediate-reinforcement condition. These results suggest that even when rats are exposed to different conditions in the same session, similar results occur to those found when these conditions are arranged between phases. Similarly, they provide some information regarding the usefulness of employing a multiple schedule to assess the effects of different variables (Immediate, Unsignaled, and Signaled food deliveries) in relatively less time than a between-phases procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta
Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta Psychology-Applied Psychology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信