第二部分保护手段,第八章美洲人权法院,第1段组织机构第五十六条

Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène
{"title":"第二部分保护手段,第八章美洲人权法院,第1段组织机构第五十六条","authors":"Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores Article 56 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), which deals with an important procedural question. It establishes the quorum required for the Inter-American Court's deliberation, that is, the required number of judges taking physically part in the deliberation, for the decision to be legally valid. This rule is crucial. If the quorum is not met, the decisions taken during a meeting cannot be considered as adopted by the Court. The threshold laid down in Article 56 applies both when the Court exercises its contentious jurisdiction under Articles 61 and 62 and when it is requested to deliver an advisory opinion in accordance with Article 64 of the ACHR. The provision is closely linked to Article 55 of the ACHR relating to the national judge and the ad hoc judge.","PeriodicalId":22363,"journal":{"name":"The American Convention on Human Rights","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 56\",\"authors\":\"Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores Article 56 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), which deals with an important procedural question. It establishes the quorum required for the Inter-American Court's deliberation, that is, the required number of judges taking physically part in the deliberation, for the decision to be legally valid. This rule is crucial. If the quorum is not met, the decisions taken during a meeting cannot be considered as adopted by the Court. The threshold laid down in Article 56 applies both when the Court exercises its contentious jurisdiction under Articles 61 and 62 and when it is requested to deliver an advisory opinion in accordance with Article 64 of the ACHR. The provision is closely linked to Article 55 of the ACHR relating to the national judge and the ad hoc judge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Convention on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Convention on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Convention on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨《美洲人权公约》第56条,该条涉及一个重要的程序问题。它规定了美洲法院审议所需的法定人数,即实际参与审议的法官人数,使决定具有法律效力。这条规则至关重要。如未达到法定人数,则会议期间作出的决定不能视为法院通过。第56条规定的门槛既适用于法院根据第61条和第62条行使其有争议的管辖权,也适用于法院根据《欧洲人权公约》第64条被要求发表咨询意见的情况。这项规定与《人权公约》关于国家法官和特设法官的第55条密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 56
This chapter explores Article 56 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), which deals with an important procedural question. It establishes the quorum required for the Inter-American Court's deliberation, that is, the required number of judges taking physically part in the deliberation, for the decision to be legally valid. This rule is crucial. If the quorum is not met, the decisions taken during a meeting cannot be considered as adopted by the Court. The threshold laid down in Article 56 applies both when the Court exercises its contentious jurisdiction under Articles 61 and 62 and when it is requested to deliver an advisory opinion in accordance with Article 64 of the ACHR. The provision is closely linked to Article 55 of the ACHR relating to the national judge and the ad hoc judge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信