“让我们谈谈性”:对男同性恋者肛交的意义和体验的后结构主义话语分析

R. Gillibrand, Kevin Turner
{"title":"“让我们谈谈性”:对男同性恋者肛交的意义和体验的后结构主义话语分析","authors":"R. Gillibrand, Kevin Turner","doi":"10.53841/bpssex.2013.4.1.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a post-structuralist discourse analytic approach this paper investigates the lived in experiences and meanings of anal sex amongst seven gay men. Findings indicate the role of discourse in constructing gay men’s understanding of sexual experiences. These men offered varying perspectives on their expectations of anal sex within casual and committed relationships. Sex did not have fixed meanings based on heterosexual dichotomies but was socially constructed through sexual experiences providing opportunities for negotiation and unfolding of meaning. The men had complex risk management strategies in weighing up the need for protection from STIs but embracing the need for intimacy and trust. This study provides an important insight into some gay men’s sexual practices that can be incorporated into targeted health promotion campaigns.","PeriodicalId":91790,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sexualities review","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Let’s talk about sex’: A post-structuralist discourse analysis into the meanings and experiences of anal sex for gay men\",\"authors\":\"R. Gillibrand, Kevin Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpssex.2013.4.1.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a post-structuralist discourse analytic approach this paper investigates the lived in experiences and meanings of anal sex amongst seven gay men. Findings indicate the role of discourse in constructing gay men’s understanding of sexual experiences. These men offered varying perspectives on their expectations of anal sex within casual and committed relationships. Sex did not have fixed meanings based on heterosexual dichotomies but was socially constructed through sexual experiences providing opportunities for negotiation and unfolding of meaning. The men had complex risk management strategies in weighing up the need for protection from STIs but embracing the need for intimacy and trust. This study provides an important insight into some gay men’s sexual practices that can be incorporated into targeted health promotion campaigns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of sexualities review\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of sexualities review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpssex.2013.4.1.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of sexualities review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpssex.2013.4.1.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文运用后结构主义话语分析的方法,研究了七位男同性恋者肛交的生活经历和意义。研究结果表明话语在构建男同性恋者对性体验的理解中的作用。这些男性对在随意和忠诚的关系中进行肛交的期望提供了不同的观点。性没有基于异性恋二分法的固定意义,而是通过性经验提供了协商和展开意义的机会而被社会建构的。这些男性在权衡性传播感染的保护需求的同时,也接受了亲密和信任的需求,他们有复杂的风险管理策略。这项研究对一些男同性恋者的性行为提供了重要的见解,可以纳入有针对性的健康促进活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Let’s talk about sex’: A post-structuralist discourse analysis into the meanings and experiences of anal sex for gay men
Using a post-structuralist discourse analytic approach this paper investigates the lived in experiences and meanings of anal sex amongst seven gay men. Findings indicate the role of discourse in constructing gay men’s understanding of sexual experiences. These men offered varying perspectives on their expectations of anal sex within casual and committed relationships. Sex did not have fixed meanings based on heterosexual dichotomies but was socially constructed through sexual experiences providing opportunities for negotiation and unfolding of meaning. The men had complex risk management strategies in weighing up the need for protection from STIs but embracing the need for intimacy and trust. This study provides an important insight into some gay men’s sexual practices that can be incorporated into targeted health promotion campaigns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信