未通过拍卖机制进行的银行抵押品买卖的合法性

Anjel Ria Meilivia Kanter, M. Bakri, Imam Koeswahyono
{"title":"未通过拍卖机制进行的银行抵押品买卖的合法性","authors":"Anjel Ria Meilivia Kanter, M. Bakri, Imam Koeswahyono","doi":"10.30649/PHJ.V17I1.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sale and Purchase of the mortgage lending object is intended to pay off the loan from the debtor. Based on the background, then as for the formulation of the problem of writing is a. How does the validity of the sale and purchase of the object of guarantee of mortgage rights by the bank conducted without through the auction mechanism? b. What are the legal consequences for the sale and purchase of the mortgage guarantee object by the bank which is conducted without the auction mechanism? The research method used is normative juridical research with approach approaches statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach (Case Approach). The result of this research is the Sale and Purchase of the object of mortgage guarantee which is done under the hand and without the debtor's consent is a unlawful act where the sale and purchase of the mortgage security object is contrary to the provisions set forth in Article 6 and Article 20 of Law no. 4 Year 1996 Concerning the Rights of Consumers therefore the sale and purchase of a guarantee maternity guarantee is null and void or it is deemed that there has never been any sale. Furthermore, the Sale and Purchase of the underwriting object under the hand is contrary to Article 20 paragraph 1 (one), paragraph 2 (two), and paragraph 3 (three) of Law no. 4 of 1996 Concerning the Deposit Rights shall have legal consequences for the Creditor as the seller and PPAT as the Officer making the Sale and Purchase Certificate as well as for the Buyer who has good trade","PeriodicalId":31466,"journal":{"name":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KEABSAHAN JUAL BELI ATAS OBJEK JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN OLEH BANK YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA MELALUI MEKANISME LELANG\",\"authors\":\"Anjel Ria Meilivia Kanter, M. Bakri, Imam Koeswahyono\",\"doi\":\"10.30649/PHJ.V17I1.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Sale and Purchase of the mortgage lending object is intended to pay off the loan from the debtor. Based on the background, then as for the formulation of the problem of writing is a. How does the validity of the sale and purchase of the object of guarantee of mortgage rights by the bank conducted without through the auction mechanism? b. What are the legal consequences for the sale and purchase of the mortgage guarantee object by the bank which is conducted without the auction mechanism? The research method used is normative juridical research with approach approaches statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach (Case Approach). The result of this research is the Sale and Purchase of the object of mortgage guarantee which is done under the hand and without the debtor's consent is a unlawful act where the sale and purchase of the mortgage security object is contrary to the provisions set forth in Article 6 and Article 20 of Law no. 4 Year 1996 Concerning the Rights of Consumers therefore the sale and purchase of a guarantee maternity guarantee is null and void or it is deemed that there has never been any sale. Furthermore, the Sale and Purchase of the underwriting object under the hand is contrary to Article 20 paragraph 1 (one), paragraph 2 (two), and paragraph 3 (three) of Law no. 4 of 1996 Concerning the Deposit Rights shall have legal consequences for the Creditor as the seller and PPAT as the Officer making the Sale and Purchase Certificate as well as for the Buyer who has good trade\",\"PeriodicalId\":31466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspektif Hukum Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspektif Hukum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30649/PHJ.V17I1.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30649/PHJ.V17I1.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抵押贷款标的的买卖是为了偿还债务人的贷款。基于此背景,那么对于书面形式的制定问题是一。银行在不通过拍卖机制的情况下进行的抵押权利担保标的买卖的效力如何确定?b.银行未经拍卖机制买卖抵押担保标的的法律后果是什么?研究方法是规范的法律研究,包括方法法、法规法、概念法、案例法。本研究的结果是,未经债务人同意,擅自买卖抵押担保标的的行为违反本法第6条、第20条的规定,属于违法行为。因此,关于消费者权利的担保的销售和购买是无效的,或者被视为从未进行过任何销售。此外,手下承销标的的买卖违反中华人民共和国中华人民共和国证券法第二十条第一项、第二项、第三项规定。对于作为卖方的债权人和作为制作买卖证明书的官员的PPAT以及具有良好贸易关系的买方,关于保证金权利的1996年第4条应具有法律后果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KEABSAHAN JUAL BELI ATAS OBJEK JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN OLEH BANK YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA MELALUI MEKANISME LELANG
The Sale and Purchase of the mortgage lending object is intended to pay off the loan from the debtor. Based on the background, then as for the formulation of the problem of writing is a. How does the validity of the sale and purchase of the object of guarantee of mortgage rights by the bank conducted without through the auction mechanism? b. What are the legal consequences for the sale and purchase of the mortgage guarantee object by the bank which is conducted without the auction mechanism? The research method used is normative juridical research with approach approaches statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach (Case Approach). The result of this research is the Sale and Purchase of the object of mortgage guarantee which is done under the hand and without the debtor's consent is a unlawful act where the sale and purchase of the mortgage security object is contrary to the provisions set forth in Article 6 and Article 20 of Law no. 4 Year 1996 Concerning the Rights of Consumers therefore the sale and purchase of a guarantee maternity guarantee is null and void or it is deemed that there has never been any sale. Furthermore, the Sale and Purchase of the underwriting object under the hand is contrary to Article 20 paragraph 1 (one), paragraph 2 (two), and paragraph 3 (three) of Law no. 4 of 1996 Concerning the Deposit Rights shall have legal consequences for the Creditor as the seller and PPAT as the Officer making the Sale and Purchase Certificate as well as for the Buyer who has good trade
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信