英格兰:最高法院对琼斯诉克诺特案的判决是否澄清了与家庭住宅信托有关的法律?

Bartłomiej Orawiec
{"title":"英格兰:最高法院对琼斯诉克诺特案的判决是否澄清了与家庭住宅信托有关的法律?","authors":"Bartłomiej Orawiec","doi":"10.31743/recl.4313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This dissertation will focus on common intention constructive trusts in relation to shared ownership of the family home predominantly in relation to unmarried couples. These trusts are particularly important because as opposed to married couples where the court may determine a couple’s financial and property issues upon divorce using the provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the position of unmarried couples is not covered by any legislation and so judges need to refer back to case law and property law in order to establish the equitable ownership of property.","PeriodicalId":20823,"journal":{"name":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","volume":"96 1","pages":"85-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ENGLAND: DID THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURTIN THE CASE OF JONES V KERNOTT CLARIFY THE LAWIN RELATION TO TRUSTS OF THE FAMILY HOME?\",\"authors\":\"Bartłomiej Orawiec\",\"doi\":\"10.31743/recl.4313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This dissertation will focus on common intention constructive trusts in relation to shared ownership of the family home predominantly in relation to unmarried couples. These trusts are particularly important because as opposed to married couples where the court may determine a couple’s financial and property issues upon divorce using the provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the position of unmarried couples is not covered by any legislation and so judges need to refer back to case law and property law in order to establish the equitable ownership of property.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"85-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.4313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.4313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将重点研究共同意图建设性信托与家庭房屋共同所有权的关系,主要是与未婚夫妇有关。这些信托特别重要,因为与已婚夫妇相反,法院可以根据《1973年婚姻诉讼法》的规定在离婚时确定一对夫妇的财务和财产问题,而未婚夫妇的地位不受任何立法的保护,因此法官需要参考判例法和财产法,以确定财产的公平所有权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ENGLAND: DID THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURTIN THE CASE OF JONES V KERNOTT CLARIFY THE LAWIN RELATION TO TRUSTS OF THE FAMILY HOME?
This dissertation will focus on common intention constructive trusts in relation to shared ownership of the family home predominantly in relation to unmarried couples. These trusts are particularly important because as opposed to married couples where the court may determine a couple’s financial and property issues upon divorce using the provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the position of unmarried couples is not covered by any legislation and so judges need to refer back to case law and property law in order to establish the equitable ownership of property.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信