印太战略会包围中国吗?

Rahat Shah
{"title":"印太战略会包围中国吗?","authors":"Rahat Shah","doi":"10.1080/18366503.2020.1782806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The US Indo-Pacific Strategy is a major new regional strategic initiative, which is widely regarded as the focus of anti-China. On the multilateral front, the proposal is represented by the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue among the United States, Japan, Australia, and India, which was resumed in 2017 after a 10-year hiatus. Washington's own Indo-Pacific Strategy has drawn on years of confabulations with these like-minded states. Washington feels threatened that Beijing, as a competitor, may alter the balance of power in its favour, thereby endangering its hegemony. Beijing is emerging as the dominant power in the Indo-Pacific, raising the question of whether the Indo-Pacific Strategy will besiege China. We argue that China is no longer in siege position because the strategic interests of Japan and India are converging with those of China. These convergences show that China is benign rather than aggressive towards key regional players. The recent consensus on fundamental issues such as the China–India border, the Beijing-Tokyo Senkaku islands, and military cooperation is a significant milestone in ameliorating bilateral relations.","PeriodicalId":37179,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs","volume":"426 1","pages":"125 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will the Indo-Pacific strategy besiege China?\",\"authors\":\"Rahat Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18366503.2020.1782806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The US Indo-Pacific Strategy is a major new regional strategic initiative, which is widely regarded as the focus of anti-China. On the multilateral front, the proposal is represented by the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue among the United States, Japan, Australia, and India, which was resumed in 2017 after a 10-year hiatus. Washington's own Indo-Pacific Strategy has drawn on years of confabulations with these like-minded states. Washington feels threatened that Beijing, as a competitor, may alter the balance of power in its favour, thereby endangering its hegemony. Beijing is emerging as the dominant power in the Indo-Pacific, raising the question of whether the Indo-Pacific Strategy will besiege China. We argue that China is no longer in siege position because the strategic interests of Japan and India are converging with those of China. These convergences show that China is benign rather than aggressive towards key regional players. The recent consensus on fundamental issues such as the China–India border, the Beijing-Tokyo Senkaku islands, and military cooperation is a significant milestone in ameliorating bilateral relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs\",\"volume\":\"426 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2020.1782806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2020.1782806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

美国的印太战略是一项重大的新的区域战略倡议,被广泛认为是美国反华的焦点。在多边方面,以中断10年后于2017年恢复的美、日、澳、印四方安全对话为代表。华盛顿自己的印太战略是多年来与这些志同道合的国家进行磋商的结果。华盛顿感到威胁的是,作为竞争对手的北京可能会改变力量平衡,使之对自己有利,从而危及美国的霸权。中国正在成为印度太平洋地区的主导力量,“印度太平洋战略”是否会将中国包围?我们认为,中国不再处于被包围的境地,因为日本和印度的战略利益正在与中国的战略利益趋同。这些趋同表明,中国对关键的地区参与者是温和的,而不是咄咄逼人的。最近在中印边界、中日尖阁列岛、军事合作等根本性问题上达成的共识,是两国关系改善的重要里程碑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Will the Indo-Pacific strategy besiege China?
ABSTRACT The US Indo-Pacific Strategy is a major new regional strategic initiative, which is widely regarded as the focus of anti-China. On the multilateral front, the proposal is represented by the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue among the United States, Japan, Australia, and India, which was resumed in 2017 after a 10-year hiatus. Washington's own Indo-Pacific Strategy has drawn on years of confabulations with these like-minded states. Washington feels threatened that Beijing, as a competitor, may alter the balance of power in its favour, thereby endangering its hegemony. Beijing is emerging as the dominant power in the Indo-Pacific, raising the question of whether the Indo-Pacific Strategy will besiege China. We argue that China is no longer in siege position because the strategic interests of Japan and India are converging with those of China. These convergences show that China is benign rather than aggressive towards key regional players. The recent consensus on fundamental issues such as the China–India border, the Beijing-Tokyo Senkaku islands, and military cooperation is a significant milestone in ameliorating bilateral relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs
Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信