专业人员集中化:这是管理型大学的另一种象征性暴力手段吗?

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anita Louise Wheeldon, S. Whitty, Bronte van der Hoorn
{"title":"专业人员集中化:这是管理型大学的另一种象征性暴力手段吗?","authors":"Anita Louise Wheeldon, S. Whitty, Bronte van der Hoorn","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2022.2095993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT If centralising university services is regarded as operationally ineffective, why do managerialised universities continue to organise themselves this way? We investigate an occurrence of this paradox at a regional Australian university, where professional staff services were centralised for a period of 7 years. They were separated from academics and their role repurposed to focus on student needs rather than continuing to support academics. As a method of analysis, we use a Bourdieusian lens to illuminate the power dynamics between fields to reveal, what we argue appears to be a symbolically violent view of centralising services. We conclude that universities continue to centralise services to increase management power, yet this strategy undermines managerialism’s own efforts of increasing operational outcomes because it increases conflict between the staff it relies on to be a university.","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":"13 1","pages":"181 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centralising professional staff: is this another instrument of symbolic violence in the managerialised university?\",\"authors\":\"Anita Louise Wheeldon, S. Whitty, Bronte van der Hoorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220620.2022.2095993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT If centralising university services is regarded as operationally ineffective, why do managerialised universities continue to organise themselves this way? We investigate an occurrence of this paradox at a regional Australian university, where professional staff services were centralised for a period of 7 years. They were separated from academics and their role repurposed to focus on student needs rather than continuing to support academics. As a method of analysis, we use a Bourdieusian lens to illuminate the power dynamics between fields to reveal, what we argue appears to be a symbolically violent view of centralising services. We conclude that universities continue to centralise services to increase management power, yet this strategy undermines managerialism’s own efforts of increasing operational outcomes because it increases conflict between the staff it relies on to be a university.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Administration and History\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Administration and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2095993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2095993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

如果大学服务的集中化被认为在操作上是无效的,为什么管理大学继续以这种方式组织自己?我们调查了澳大利亚一所地区大学发生的这种悖论,该大学的专业人员服务集中了7年。他们从学术中分离出来,他们的角色被重新定位为关注学生的需求,而不是继续支持学术。作为一种分析方法,我们使用布尔迪厄的镜头来阐明领域之间的权力动态,以揭示我们认为似乎是集中化服务的象征性暴力观点。我们得出的结论是,大学继续集中服务以增加管理权力,但这种策略破坏了管理主义自身提高运营成果的努力,因为它增加了大学所依赖的员工之间的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Centralising professional staff: is this another instrument of symbolic violence in the managerialised university?
ABSTRACT If centralising university services is regarded as operationally ineffective, why do managerialised universities continue to organise themselves this way? We investigate an occurrence of this paradox at a regional Australian university, where professional staff services were centralised for a period of 7 years. They were separated from academics and their role repurposed to focus on student needs rather than continuing to support academics. As a method of analysis, we use a Bourdieusian lens to illuminate the power dynamics between fields to reveal, what we argue appears to be a symbolically violent view of centralising services. We conclude that universities continue to centralise services to increase management power, yet this strategy undermines managerialism’s own efforts of increasing operational outcomes because it increases conflict between the staff it relies on to be a university.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Administration and History
Journal of Educational Administration and History EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信