北爱尔兰

Kerry O'Halloran
{"title":"北爱尔兰","authors":"Kerry O'Halloran","doi":"10.1177/03085759221129878a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the new hearings at first instance could reach the same decisions. Many judgements are circulated in draft to allow corrections and amendments, where necessary, before the perfected version is handed down. Given the importance of rigorous analysis and the impact of a failure to record this in the judgement, should the draft judgement be checked for analysis as well as for errors? It might require a bold advocate to ask a judge to ‘show your workings’ if a judgement is lacking, but it is clear that the appellate courts are not going to infer proper analysis if none is explicitly recorded.","PeriodicalId":92743,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & fostering","volume":"27 1","pages":"340 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Northern Ireland\",\"authors\":\"Kerry O'Halloran\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03085759221129878a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the new hearings at first instance could reach the same decisions. Many judgements are circulated in draft to allow corrections and amendments, where necessary, before the perfected version is handed down. Given the importance of rigorous analysis and the impact of a failure to record this in the judgement, should the draft judgement be checked for analysis as well as for errors? It might require a bold advocate to ask a judge to ‘show your workings’ if a judgement is lacking, but it is clear that the appellate courts are not going to infer proper analysis if none is explicitly recorded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adoption & fostering\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"340 - 344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adoption & fostering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759221129878a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & fostering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759221129878a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的一审听证会可能会做出同样的裁决。许多判决书以草稿形式分发,以便在必要时允许进行更正和修改,然后再将完善的判决书印发。考虑到严格分析的重要性和未能在判断中记录这一点的影响,是否应该检查判断草案的分析和错误?如果缺乏判决,可能需要一个大胆的倡导者要求法官“展示你的工作”,但很明显,如果没有明确记录,上诉法院就不会推断出适当的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Northern Ireland
the new hearings at first instance could reach the same decisions. Many judgements are circulated in draft to allow corrections and amendments, where necessary, before the perfected version is handed down. Given the importance of rigorous analysis and the impact of a failure to record this in the judgement, should the draft judgement be checked for analysis as well as for errors? It might require a bold advocate to ask a judge to ‘show your workings’ if a judgement is lacking, but it is clear that the appellate courts are not going to infer proper analysis if none is explicitly recorded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信