假性连续非对比灌注法在1.5和3t磁场强度磁共振扫描仪上脑血流在胶质瘤中的差异

IF 2.2 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

Radiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-02-26 DOI:10.52560/2713-0118-2022-1-30-44

A. Sudarikova, A. Batalov, E. Pogosbekyan, L. Fadeeva, N. Zakharova, I. Pronin

{"title":"假性连续非对比灌注法在1.5和3t磁场强度磁共振扫描仪上脑血流在胶质瘤中的差异","authors":"A. Sudarikova, A. Batalov, E. Pogosbekyan, L. Fadeeva, N. Zakharova, I. Pronin","doi":"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-1-30-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work is to evaluate the universality of non-contrast MR perfusion (PCASL) in determining the rate of cerebral blood flow (CBF) of brain gliomas using magnetic resonance scanners with different magnetic field strengths. The maximum and normalized CBF values, which received on 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI in the same patients with histologically verified high grade gliomas (III, IV grade), were compared with each other. The data obtained by us are reliably comparable, which allows us to consider pCASL as a universal technique for scanners with different magnetic strengths.","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Cerebral Blood Flow in Gliomas on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners with Magnetic Field Strengths of 1.5 and 3 T by the Method of Pseudo-Continuous Non-Contrast Perfusion\",\"authors\":\"A. Sudarikova, A. Batalov, E. Pogosbekyan, L. Fadeeva, N. Zakharova, I. Pronin\",\"doi\":\"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-1-30-44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this work is to evaluate the universality of non-contrast MR perfusion (PCASL) in determining the rate of cerebral blood flow (CBF) of brain gliomas using magnetic resonance scanners with different magnetic field strengths. The maximum and normalized CBF values, which received on 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI in the same patients with histologically verified high grade gliomas (III, IV grade), were compared with each other. The data obtained by us are reliably comparable, which allows us to consider pCASL as a universal technique for scanners with different magnetic strengths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-1-30-44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-1-30-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估非对比磁共振灌注(PCASL)在使用不同磁场强度的磁共振扫描仪测定脑胶质瘤脑血流量(CBF)中的普遍性。对组织学证实的高级别胶质瘤(III级、IV级)患者在1.5 T和3.0 T MRI上的最大CBF值和归一化CBF值进行比较。我们获得的数据具有可靠的可比性，这使我们能够将pCASL视为不同磁强扫描仪的通用技术。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Differences in Cerebral Blood Flow in Gliomas on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners with Magnetic Field Strengths of 1.5 and 3 T by the Method of Pseudo-Continuous Non-Contrast Perfusion

The aim of this work is to evaluate the universality of non-contrast MR perfusion (PCASL) in determining the rate of cerebral blood flow (CBF) of brain gliomas using magnetic resonance scanners with different magnetic field strengths. The maximum and normalized CBF values, which received on 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI in the same patients with histologically verified high grade gliomas (III, IV grade), were compared with each other. The data obtained by us are reliably comparable, which allows us to consider pCASL as a universal technique for scanners with different magnetic strengths.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Radiology Research and Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

17 weeks

期刊介绍： Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen