基于强度的超声图像配准中两种相似性度量的比较

Shuang Gao, Yang Xiao, Shaohai Hu
{"title":"基于强度的超声图像配准中两种相似性度量的比较","authors":"Shuang Gao, Yang Xiao, Shaohai Hu","doi":"10.1109/ISCAS.2004.1328940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate two registration methods for ultrasound image relying on the intensity-based similarity measure. In the first method intensity information is given by feature points which have been extracted by using Harris corner detector. The registration similarity measure is then defined as a cost-function - error cost function. In the latter method we use the same cost-function, but the uniqueness control and region correspondence are not uniform with the first method. Given this similarity measure, parametric ultrasound image registration is stated as a minimization issue. We even exploit the polynomial technique to transform the whole image dataset and estimate the sum of square error in the first measure. The result indicates that the two methods are robust and of the order of our requirements, but the latter measure outperforms the first one.","PeriodicalId":6445,"journal":{"name":"2004 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37512)","volume":"6 1","pages":"IV-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two similarity measures in intensity-based ultrasound image registration\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Gao, Yang Xiao, Shaohai Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCAS.2004.1328940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate two registration methods for ultrasound image relying on the intensity-based similarity measure. In the first method intensity information is given by feature points which have been extracted by using Harris corner detector. The registration similarity measure is then defined as a cost-function - error cost function. In the latter method we use the same cost-function, but the uniqueness control and region correspondence are not uniform with the first method. Given this similarity measure, parametric ultrasound image registration is stated as a minimization issue. We even exploit the polynomial technique to transform the whole image dataset and estimate the sum of square error in the first measure. The result indicates that the two methods are robust and of the order of our requirements, but the latter measure outperforms the first one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2004 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37512)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"IV-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2004 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37512)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2004.1328940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37512)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2004.1328940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究了两种基于强度相似度的超声图像配准方法。在第一种方法中,强度信息由哈里斯角点检测器提取的特征点给出。然后将配准相似度度量定义为代价函数-错误代价函数。在后一种方法中,我们使用了相同的代价函数,但唯一性控制和区域对应性与第一种方法不一致。鉴于这种相似性度量,参数超声图像配准被认为是最小化问题。我们甚至利用多项式技术对整个图像数据集进行变换,并在第一次测量中估计平方和误差。结果表明,两种方法都具有较强的鲁棒性,符合我们的要求,但后一种方法的性能优于前一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of two similarity measures in intensity-based ultrasound image registration
We investigate two registration methods for ultrasound image relying on the intensity-based similarity measure. In the first method intensity information is given by feature points which have been extracted by using Harris corner detector. The registration similarity measure is then defined as a cost-function - error cost function. In the latter method we use the same cost-function, but the uniqueness control and region correspondence are not uniform with the first method. Given this similarity measure, parametric ultrasound image registration is stated as a minimization issue. We even exploit the polynomial technique to transform the whole image dataset and estimate the sum of square error in the first measure. The result indicates that the two methods are robust and of the order of our requirements, but the latter measure outperforms the first one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信