输卵管异位妊娠。

R. Varma, J. Gupta
{"title":"输卵管异位妊娠。","authors":"R. Varma, J. Gupta","doi":"10.53347/rid-36812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nApproximately 1/100 pregnancies are ectopic, with the conceptus usually implanting in the fallopian tube. Some ectopic pregnancies resolve spontaneously, but others continue to grow and lead to rupture of the tube. Risks are higher in women with damage to the fallopian tubes due to pelvic infections, surgery, or previous ectopic pregnancy.\n\n\nMETHODS AND OUTCOMES\nWe conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What treatments improve outcomes in women with unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2008 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The authors also separately searched Medline and Pubmed up to May 2008 in addition to the Clinical Evidence systematic search to support the comments and clinical guide sections.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe found 47 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: salpingotomy, salpingectomy, systemic methotrexate, systemic methotrexate following salpingotomy, and expectant management.","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tubal ectopic pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"R. Varma, J. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.53347/rid-36812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nApproximately 1/100 pregnancies are ectopic, with the conceptus usually implanting in the fallopian tube. Some ectopic pregnancies resolve spontaneously, but others continue to grow and lead to rupture of the tube. Risks are higher in women with damage to the fallopian tubes due to pelvic infections, surgery, or previous ectopic pregnancy.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS AND OUTCOMES\\nWe conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What treatments improve outcomes in women with unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2008 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The authors also separately searched Medline and Pubmed up to May 2008 in addition to the Clinical Evidence systematic search to support the comments and clinical guide sections.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWe found 47 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nIn this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: salpingotomy, salpingectomy, systemic methotrexate, systemic methotrexate following salpingotomy, and expectant management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53347/rid-36812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53347/rid-36812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

大约有1/100的妊娠是异位妊娠,胚胎通常植入输卵管。有些异位妊娠会自行消退,但有些则会继续生长并导致输卵管破裂。由于盆腔感染、手术或既往异位妊娠导致输卵管损伤的女性风险更高。方法和结果我们进行了一项系统回顾,旨在回答以下临床问题:哪些治疗可以改善未破裂输卵管异位妊娠的结局?我们检索了Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library和其他重要数据库,检索时间截止到2008年5月(临床证据综述定期更新,请在我们的网站上查看本综述的最新版本)。我们纳入了来自相关组织的危害警报,如美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和英国药品和保健产品监管局(MHRA)。除了临床证据系统检索之外,作者还分别检索了2008年5月之前的Medline和Pubmed,以支持评论和临床指南部分。结果我们发现47项系统综述、随机对照试验或观察性研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们对干预措施的证据质量进行了GRADE评价。结论:在这篇系统综述中,我们介绍了以下干预措施的有效性和安全性:输卵管切开术、输卵管切除术、全身甲氨蝶呤、输卵管切开术后全身甲氨蝶呤和预期治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tubal ectopic pregnancy.
INTRODUCTION Approximately 1/100 pregnancies are ectopic, with the conceptus usually implanting in the fallopian tube. Some ectopic pregnancies resolve spontaneously, but others continue to grow and lead to rupture of the tube. Risks are higher in women with damage to the fallopian tubes due to pelvic infections, surgery, or previous ectopic pregnancy. METHODS AND OUTCOMES We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What treatments improve outcomes in women with unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2008 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The authors also separately searched Medline and Pubmed up to May 2008 in addition to the Clinical Evidence systematic search to support the comments and clinical guide sections. RESULTS We found 47 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: salpingotomy, salpingectomy, systemic methotrexate, systemic methotrexate following salpingotomy, and expectant management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信