社区强迫:精神卫生专业人员对社区强迫的看法和经验

D. Coyle, R. Macpherson, C. Foy, A. Molodynski, Maya Biju, J. Hayes
{"title":"社区强迫:精神卫生专业人员对社区强迫的看法和经验","authors":"D. Coyle, R. Macpherson, C. Foy, A. Molodynski, Maya Biju, J. Hayes","doi":"10.1192/PB.BP.112.038703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and method We surveyed the views and experiences of all mental health professionals in adult community mental health teams and approved mental health professionals in 2Gether and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trusts, regarding the use of community treatment orders (CTOs). Results A total of 288 surveys were completed (response rate 48%). Forty-eight (83%) psychiatrists and 142 (67%) non-psychiatrist mental health professionals were in favour of CTOs. The decision-making regarding CTOs was overwhelmingly clinically oriented for all professional groups. However, there were significant differences in views between groups regarding the effects of bureaucracy, the infringement of human rights and coercion. Clinical implications Multidisciplinary team involvement is crucial in decisions regarding CTOs and may protect against idiosyncratic or unhelpful practice. Further training for staff is urgently required and there may be a case for creating small local reference groups that can develop expertise and provide advice and support for clinical teams.","PeriodicalId":89639,"journal":{"name":"The psychiatrist","volume":"1 1","pages":"315-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compulsion in the community: Mental health professionals' views and experiences of CTOs\",\"authors\":\"D. Coyle, R. Macpherson, C. Foy, A. Molodynski, Maya Biju, J. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/PB.BP.112.038703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims and method We surveyed the views and experiences of all mental health professionals in adult community mental health teams and approved mental health professionals in 2Gether and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trusts, regarding the use of community treatment orders (CTOs). Results A total of 288 surveys were completed (response rate 48%). Forty-eight (83%) psychiatrists and 142 (67%) non-psychiatrist mental health professionals were in favour of CTOs. The decision-making regarding CTOs was overwhelmingly clinically oriented for all professional groups. However, there were significant differences in views between groups regarding the effects of bureaucracy, the infringement of human rights and coercion. Clinical implications Multidisciplinary team involvement is crucial in decisions regarding CTOs and may protect against idiosyncratic or unhelpful practice. Further training for staff is urgently required and there may be a case for creating small local reference groups that can develop expertise and provide advice and support for clinical teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The psychiatrist\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"315-321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The psychiatrist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.BP.112.038703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The psychiatrist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.BP.112.038703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

目的和方法我们调查了成人社区精神卫生团队的所有精神卫生专业人员以及2Gether和牛津健康NHS基金会信托基金批准的精神卫生专业人员关于使用社区治疗令(CTOs)的观点和经验。结果共完成问卷调查288份,回复率48%。48名(83%)精神科医生和142名(67%)非精神科医生的心理健康专业人员支持cto。所有专业团体对cto的决策绝大多数是临床导向的。但是,各群体对官僚主义的影响、侵犯人权和胁迫的看法有很大的不同。临床意义多学科团队参与对cto决策至关重要,可以防止特殊或无益的做法。迫切需要对工作人员进行进一步培训,并且可能有理由建立小型的地方参考小组,以发展专门知识并为临床小组提供咨询和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compulsion in the community: Mental health professionals' views and experiences of CTOs
Aims and method We surveyed the views and experiences of all mental health professionals in adult community mental health teams and approved mental health professionals in 2Gether and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trusts, regarding the use of community treatment orders (CTOs). Results A total of 288 surveys were completed (response rate 48%). Forty-eight (83%) psychiatrists and 142 (67%) non-psychiatrist mental health professionals were in favour of CTOs. The decision-making regarding CTOs was overwhelmingly clinically oriented for all professional groups. However, there were significant differences in views between groups regarding the effects of bureaucracy, the infringement of human rights and coercion. Clinical implications Multidisciplinary team involvement is crucial in decisions regarding CTOs and may protect against idiosyncratic or unhelpful practice. Further training for staff is urgently required and there may be a case for creating small local reference groups that can develop expertise and provide advice and support for clinical teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信