胸腰椎骨折开放与经皮椎弓根螺钉固定的比较

Syed Ahmad Faizan, Muhammad Jahanzeb, Zubair MustafaKhan, Tariq Imran, Abdul Majid, Asif Bashir
{"title":"胸腰椎骨折开放与经皮椎弓根螺钉固定的比较","authors":"Syed Ahmad Faizan, Muhammad Jahanzeb, Zubair MustafaKhan, Tariq Imran, Abdul Majid, Asif Bashir","doi":"10.36552/pjns.v26i1.642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"meantime to return to work following percutaneous transpedicular fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation. We evaluated the average time required to return to work following percutaneous transpedicular fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation in traumatic lumbar spine injury. \nMaterial and Methods:  A randomized controlled trial included 60 patients. At study entry baseline demographics (age, gender, & duration of injury) were recorded. 30 patients were in the percutaneous transpedicular fixation group (A), while 30 patients were in the open pedicle screw fixation group (B). All the patients were followed every month time taken to return to work (TTRW) was noted on a proforma. \nResults:  Mean time taken by patients to return to work after surgery in Group A was 2.9 days, while in group B it was 5.1 days in group B. The difference between the two groups was significant (p-value 0.001). Within Group A, male and female genders showed a significant difference (p-value 0.032) in the TTRW after surgery. However, Group B did not show a similar difference between male and female patients. Duration of procedure had a significant effect on the TTRW (p-value 0.001). \nConclusion:  We found ‘ time is taken to return to work’ was 2.93 ± 0.82 in group A and 5.10 ± 0.71 in group B (P-value 0.001). There was a significant difference in both groups. Percutaneous transpedicular fixation is a fast, safe and effective method as compared to other methods.","PeriodicalId":19963,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Open Versus Percutaneous Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Syed Ahmad Faizan, Muhammad Jahanzeb, Zubair MustafaKhan, Tariq Imran, Abdul Majid, Asif Bashir\",\"doi\":\"10.36552/pjns.v26i1.642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"meantime to return to work following percutaneous transpedicular fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation. We evaluated the average time required to return to work following percutaneous transpedicular fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation in traumatic lumbar spine injury. \\nMaterial and Methods:  A randomized controlled trial included 60 patients. At study entry baseline demographics (age, gender, & duration of injury) were recorded. 30 patients were in the percutaneous transpedicular fixation group (A), while 30 patients were in the open pedicle screw fixation group (B). All the patients were followed every month time taken to return to work (TTRW) was noted on a proforma. \\nResults:  Mean time taken by patients to return to work after surgery in Group A was 2.9 days, while in group B it was 5.1 days in group B. The difference between the two groups was significant (p-value 0.001). Within Group A, male and female genders showed a significant difference (p-value 0.032) in the TTRW after surgery. However, Group B did not show a similar difference between male and female patients. Duration of procedure had a significant effect on the TTRW (p-value 0.001). \\nConclusion:  We found ‘ time is taken to return to work’ was 2.93 ± 0.82 in group A and 5.10 ± 0.71 in group B (P-value 0.001). There was a significant difference in both groups. Percutaneous transpedicular fixation is a fast, safe and effective method as compared to other methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i1.642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i1.642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与开放式椎弓根螺钉固定相比,经皮经椎弓根固定后可恢复工作。我们评估了外伤性腰椎损伤经皮经椎弓根固定与开放式椎弓根螺钉固定后恢复工作所需的平均时间。材料与方法:随机对照试验60例。在研究开始时,记录了基线人口统计数据(年龄、性别和受伤持续时间)。经皮经椎弓根固定组(A) 30例,开放式椎弓根螺钉固定组(B) 30例。每个月对所有患者进行随访,并在形式表上记录复工时间(TTRW)。结果:A组患者术后平均恢复工作时间为2.9天,B组为5.1天,两组差异有统计学意义(p值0.001)。A组内男女术后TTRW差异有统计学意义(p值为0.032)。而在B组,男性和女性患者之间没有类似的差异。手术时间对TTRW有显著影响(p值0.001)。结论:A组“恢复工作时间”为2.93±0.82,B组为5.10±0.71 (p值0.001)。两组间有显著性差异。经皮经椎弓根固定是一种快速、安全、有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Open Versus Percutaneous Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Fractures
meantime to return to work following percutaneous transpedicular fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation. We evaluated the average time required to return to work following percutaneous transpedicular fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation in traumatic lumbar spine injury. Material and Methods:  A randomized controlled trial included 60 patients. At study entry baseline demographics (age, gender, & duration of injury) were recorded. 30 patients were in the percutaneous transpedicular fixation group (A), while 30 patients were in the open pedicle screw fixation group (B). All the patients were followed every month time taken to return to work (TTRW) was noted on a proforma. Results:  Mean time taken by patients to return to work after surgery in Group A was 2.9 days, while in group B it was 5.1 days in group B. The difference between the two groups was significant (p-value 0.001). Within Group A, male and female genders showed a significant difference (p-value 0.032) in the TTRW after surgery. However, Group B did not show a similar difference between male and female patients. Duration of procedure had a significant effect on the TTRW (p-value 0.001). Conclusion:  We found ‘ time is taken to return to work’ was 2.93 ± 0.82 in group A and 5.10 ± 0.71 in group B (P-value 0.001). There was a significant difference in both groups. Percutaneous transpedicular fixation is a fast, safe and effective method as compared to other methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信