《物业市场价值评估报告》,作为地籍价值争议案件的主要证据

I. A. Chuzhinov
{"title":"《物业市场价值评估报告》,作为地籍价值争议案件的主要证据","authors":"I. A. Chuzhinov","doi":"10.35854/2219-6242-2020-2-114-118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cadastral value of real estate, determined on the basis of mass valuation based on the results of the state cadastral valuation, quite often in practice does not coincide with the market value calculated on the basis of a special valuation in respect of a particular real estate. The publication talks about the role of the assessment report and forensic examination in court cases on contesting the cadastral value in administrative proceedings due to changes in judicial practice, urgent problems are raised that need to be emphasized when filing an administrative statement of claim in court. The subject of the study is the legislative framework in the field of contesting the results of the cadastral valuation of real estate. Object of study - public relations, in part to challenge the results of the cadastral valuation of real estate. The main conclusions of the study are the inevitability of amendments to federal laws governing the procedure for approving an assessment report and forensic examination in cases of contesting cadastral value. A number of alternatives to solving the problem in cases of contesting the cadastral value in the framework of administrative proceedings are presented.","PeriodicalId":100717,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Sociology of Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"114-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Report on the Assessment of the Market Value of the Property, as the Main Evidence in Court Cases on Contesting the Cadastral Value\",\"authors\":\"I. A. Chuzhinov\",\"doi\":\"10.35854/2219-6242-2020-2-114-118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The cadastral value of real estate, determined on the basis of mass valuation based on the results of the state cadastral valuation, quite often in practice does not coincide with the market value calculated on the basis of a special valuation in respect of a particular real estate. The publication talks about the role of the assessment report and forensic examination in court cases on contesting the cadastral value in administrative proceedings due to changes in judicial practice, urgent problems are raised that need to be emphasized when filing an administrative statement of claim in court. The subject of the study is the legislative framework in the field of contesting the results of the cadastral valuation of real estate. Object of study - public relations, in part to challenge the results of the cadastral valuation of real estate. The main conclusions of the study are the inevitability of amendments to federal laws governing the procedure for approving an assessment report and forensic examination in cases of contesting cadastral value. A number of alternatives to solving the problem in cases of contesting the cadastral value in the framework of administrative proceedings are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of the Sociology of Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"114-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of the Sociology of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2020-2-114-118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Sociology of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2020-2-114-118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

房地产的地籍价值是根据国家地籍评估结果进行大规模评估而确定的,在实践中往往与特定房地产的特殊估值计算的市场价值不一致。文章论述了由于司法实践的变化,鉴定报告和司法鉴定在行政诉讼中对地籍价值争议案件中的作用,提出了在法院提交行政请求书时需要强调的迫切问题。本文的研究主题是房地产地籍估价结果争议领域的立法框架。本文的研究对象——公共关系,在一定程度上挑战了房地产地籍估价的结果。这项研究的主要结论是,不可避免地要修改有关地籍价值争议案件中批准评估报告和法医检查程序的联邦法律。提出了在行政诉讼框架下地籍价值争议案件中解决问题的若干备选办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Report on the Assessment of the Market Value of the Property, as the Main Evidence in Court Cases on Contesting the Cadastral Value
The cadastral value of real estate, determined on the basis of mass valuation based on the results of the state cadastral valuation, quite often in practice does not coincide with the market value calculated on the basis of a special valuation in respect of a particular real estate. The publication talks about the role of the assessment report and forensic examination in court cases on contesting the cadastral value in administrative proceedings due to changes in judicial practice, urgent problems are raised that need to be emphasized when filing an administrative statement of claim in court. The subject of the study is the legislative framework in the field of contesting the results of the cadastral valuation of real estate. Object of study - public relations, in part to challenge the results of the cadastral valuation of real estate. The main conclusions of the study are the inevitability of amendments to federal laws governing the procedure for approving an assessment report and forensic examination in cases of contesting cadastral value. A number of alternatives to solving the problem in cases of contesting the cadastral value in the framework of administrative proceedings are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信