我需要把目标钉在背后吗?美国《庇护法》中“特殊社会群体”的定义

Nitzan Sternberg
{"title":"我需要把目标钉在背后吗?美国《庇护法》中“特殊社会群体”的定义","authors":"Nitzan Sternberg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1797265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In U.S. asylum, there are significant differences among the federal circuit courts' approaches to defining \"particular social group\". These differences come from the circuit courts' use of different legal tests to define \"particular social group\". The different approaches to defining PSG have led to a circuit split between the Seventh Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, and the circuit courts that follow the Board of Immigration Appeals. This Note analyzes the definition of PSG in asylum law, and examines the various tests that different circuit courts use to define PSG.","PeriodicalId":83028,"journal":{"name":"The Fordham urban law journal","volume":"45 10 1","pages":"246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do I Need to Pin a Target to My Back?: The Definition of 'Particular Social Group' in U.S. Asylum Law\",\"authors\":\"Nitzan Sternberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1797265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In U.S. asylum, there are significant differences among the federal circuit courts' approaches to defining \\\"particular social group\\\". These differences come from the circuit courts' use of different legal tests to define \\\"particular social group\\\". The different approaches to defining PSG have led to a circuit split between the Seventh Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, and the circuit courts that follow the Board of Immigration Appeals. This Note analyzes the definition of PSG in asylum law, and examines the various tests that different circuit courts use to define PSG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Fordham urban law journal\",\"volume\":\"45 10 1\",\"pages\":\"246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Fordham urban law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1797265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Fordham urban law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1797265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在美国庇护案件中,联邦巡回法院对“特定社会群体”的定义存在显著差异。这些差异来自巡回法院使用不同的法律标准来定义“特定的社会群体”。定义PSG的不同方法导致了第七巡回法院、第九巡回法院和移民上诉委员会之后的巡回法院之间的巡回法院分裂。本说明分析了庇护法中PSG的定义,并检查了不同巡回法院用于定义PSG的各种测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do I Need to Pin a Target to My Back?: The Definition of 'Particular Social Group' in U.S. Asylum Law
In U.S. asylum, there are significant differences among the federal circuit courts' approaches to defining "particular social group". These differences come from the circuit courts' use of different legal tests to define "particular social group". The different approaches to defining PSG have led to a circuit split between the Seventh Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, and the circuit courts that follow the Board of Immigration Appeals. This Note analyzes the definition of PSG in asylum law, and examines the various tests that different circuit courts use to define PSG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信