大和河中大肠杆菌和大肠菌群定量方法的比较与研究

Katsushige Uranishi, Yosuke Uranishi, Mayumi Tsujimoto, Jirou Shiroyama
{"title":"大和河中大肠杆菌和大肠菌群定量方法的比较与研究","authors":"Katsushige Uranishi, Yosuke Uranishi, Mayumi Tsujimoto, Jirou Shiroyama","doi":"10.2965/jswe.45.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An environmental standard on the number of coliforms in public rivers was set in 1970 to indicate fecal contamination, but its low indexability has been a problem. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of the hydrophobic gridded membrane filter (HGMF) method using CHROMagar-ECC nutrient agar and the Colilert method for the simultaneous enumeration of coliform bacteria and coliforms, in addition to the prescribed method based on notification No.94 in 2011 of the Ministry of the Environment that can only detect coliform bacteria. From the results of the survey in the Yamato River system, we found that the three methods showed a certain consistency of results, and that the HGMF and Colilert methods were capable of identifying the sites with high contamination levels which could not be determined from coliform counts alone. We also verified how the accuracy of a new environmental standard would change when the current environmental standard is revised from the coliform group count to the Escherichia coli count, and we found that many points on effectiveness that had not been realized with the current standard are expected to be realized after the standard after the revision.","PeriodicalId":16300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Quantification Methods and Study on Escherichia coli and Coliforms in Yamato River\",\"authors\":\"Katsushige Uranishi, Yosuke Uranishi, Mayumi Tsujimoto, Jirou Shiroyama\",\"doi\":\"10.2965/jswe.45.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An environmental standard on the number of coliforms in public rivers was set in 1970 to indicate fecal contamination, but its low indexability has been a problem. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of the hydrophobic gridded membrane filter (HGMF) method using CHROMagar-ECC nutrient agar and the Colilert method for the simultaneous enumeration of coliform bacteria and coliforms, in addition to the prescribed method based on notification No.94 in 2011 of the Ministry of the Environment that can only detect coliform bacteria. From the results of the survey in the Yamato River system, we found that the three methods showed a certain consistency of results, and that the HGMF and Colilert methods were capable of identifying the sites with high contamination levels which could not be determined from coliform counts alone. We also verified how the accuracy of a new environmental standard would change when the current environmental standard is revised from the coliform group count to the Escherichia coli count, and we found that many points on effectiveness that had not been realized with the current standard are expected to be realized after the standard after the revision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2965/jswe.45.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2965/jswe.45.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1970年制定了公共河流中大肠菌群数量的环境标准,以表明粪便污染,但其低索引性一直是一个问题。除了环境部2011年第94号通报规定的只能检测大肠菌群的方法外,本研究还探讨了采用CHROMagar-ECC营养琼脂的疏水网格膜过滤法(HGMF)和Colilert法同时计数大肠菌群和大肠菌群的有效性。从大和河水系的调查结果中,我们发现三种方法的结果具有一定的一致性,HGMF和Colilert方法能够识别出仅通过大肠菌群计数无法确定的高污染点。我们还验证了现行环境标准从大肠菌群计数修订为大肠杆菌计数后,新环境标准的准确性会发生怎样的变化,我们发现现行标准没有实现的有效性的许多点,在标准修订后有望实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Quantification Methods and Study on Escherichia coli and Coliforms in Yamato River
An environmental standard on the number of coliforms in public rivers was set in 1970 to indicate fecal contamination, but its low indexability has been a problem. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of the hydrophobic gridded membrane filter (HGMF) method using CHROMagar-ECC nutrient agar and the Colilert method for the simultaneous enumeration of coliform bacteria and coliforms, in addition to the prescribed method based on notification No.94 in 2011 of the Ministry of the Environment that can only detect coliform bacteria. From the results of the survey in the Yamato River system, we found that the three methods showed a certain consistency of results, and that the HGMF and Colilert methods were capable of identifying the sites with high contamination levels which could not be determined from coliform counts alone. We also verified how the accuracy of a new environmental standard would change when the current environmental standard is revised from the coliform group count to the Escherichia coli count, and we found that many points on effectiveness that had not been realized with the current standard are expected to be realized after the standard after the revision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信