不同灌洗方式对Sealer + BC和AH + Sealer +根内牙本质润湿性的影响:一项体外研究

Q3 Dentistry
A. Chavan, T. Purayil, S. George, N. Ballal
{"title":"不同灌洗方式对Sealer + BC和AH + Sealer +根内牙本质润湿性的影响:一项体外研究","authors":"A. Chavan, T. Purayil, S. George, N. Ballal","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_25_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Irrigants play a major role in eliminating bacteria and modify the wettability of radicular dentin, thus impacting its interaction with restorative materials. Hence, the aim of the current research was to evaluate and compare the effect of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 7% maleic acid (MA) on the wettability of Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers. Materials and Methods: Thirty single-rooted premolars were decoronated and longitudinally sectioned to form 60 samples. The samples were then arbitrarily separated into three groups (n = 20) determined by the irrigation protocol: Group I (2.5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl] + 17% EDTA), Group II (2.5% NaOCl + 7% MA), and Group III (2.5% NaOCl + distilled water). Each group was then split into two subgroups (n = 10) based on the sealer utilized: Subgroup A (Sealer Plus BC sealer) and Subgroup B (AH Plus sealer). The sealers were mixed and placed on the samples. Contact angles of the sealers were determined with a goniometer. The intragroup and intergroup comparison was conducted by Two way-ANOVA test with a significance level of P < 0.01. Results: The wettability of both sealers was favorably influenced by the final irrigant rinse with 7% MA and 17% EDTA, although there was no statistical difference between both sealers in the MA group (P > 0.01). AH Plus demonstrated a better wettability than Sealer Plus BC in the EDTA group (P < 0.001). Both Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers demonstrated lower contact angles on final irrigation with 7% MA in comparison to 17% EDTA. Conclusion: As a final irrigant, 7% MA increased the wettability of both Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers compared to 17% EDTA.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"297 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of different irrigation regimens on the wettability of Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers on intraradicular dentin: An in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"A. Chavan, T. Purayil, S. George, N. Ballal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sej.sej_25_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Irrigants play a major role in eliminating bacteria and modify the wettability of radicular dentin, thus impacting its interaction with restorative materials. Hence, the aim of the current research was to evaluate and compare the effect of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 7% maleic acid (MA) on the wettability of Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers. Materials and Methods: Thirty single-rooted premolars were decoronated and longitudinally sectioned to form 60 samples. The samples were then arbitrarily separated into three groups (n = 20) determined by the irrigation protocol: Group I (2.5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl] + 17% EDTA), Group II (2.5% NaOCl + 7% MA), and Group III (2.5% NaOCl + distilled water). Each group was then split into two subgroups (n = 10) based on the sealer utilized: Subgroup A (Sealer Plus BC sealer) and Subgroup B (AH Plus sealer). The sealers were mixed and placed on the samples. Contact angles of the sealers were determined with a goniometer. The intragroup and intergroup comparison was conducted by Two way-ANOVA test with a significance level of P < 0.01. Results: The wettability of both sealers was favorably influenced by the final irrigant rinse with 7% MA and 17% EDTA, although there was no statistical difference between both sealers in the MA group (P > 0.01). AH Plus demonstrated a better wettability than Sealer Plus BC in the EDTA group (P < 0.001). Both Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers demonstrated lower contact angles on final irrigation with 7% MA in comparison to 17% EDTA. Conclusion: As a final irrigant, 7% MA increased the wettability of both Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers compared to 17% EDTA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"297 - 301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_25_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_25_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冲洗剂在消除细菌和改变根状牙本质的润湿性方面起着重要作用,从而影响其与修复材料的相互作用。因此,本研究的目的是评估和比较17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和7%马来酸(MA)对Sealer Plus BC和AH Plus密封剂润湿性的影响。材料与方法:对30颗单根前磨牙进行装饰,纵切60个标本。然后根据灌溉方案将样品随机分为三组(n = 20):组I(2.5%次氯酸钠[NaOCl] + 17% EDTA),组II (2.5% NaOCl + 7% MA)和组III (2.5% NaOCl +蒸馏水)。然后根据所使用的密封剂将每组分为两个亚组(n = 10):亚组A(密封剂加BC密封剂)和亚组B (AH加密封剂)。将密封剂混合后放在样品上。用测角仪测定密封件的接触角。组内、组间比较采用双因素方差分析(Two - way-ANOVA),显著性水平P < 0.01。结果:MA组和EDTA组的最终冲洗液对两种封口剂的润湿性均有良好的影响,但MA组两种封口剂的润湿性差异无统计学意义(P > 0.01)。EDTA组AH Plus的润湿性优于Sealer Plus BC (P < 0.001)。与17%的EDTA相比,Sealer Plus BC和AH Plus封口剂在7% MA的最终灌溉中表现出更低的接触角。结论:与17%的EDTA相比,7% MA作为最终冲洗剂增加了Sealer Plus BC和AH Plus密封剂的润湿性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of different irrigation regimens on the wettability of Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers on intraradicular dentin: An in vitro study
Introduction: Irrigants play a major role in eliminating bacteria and modify the wettability of radicular dentin, thus impacting its interaction with restorative materials. Hence, the aim of the current research was to evaluate and compare the effect of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 7% maleic acid (MA) on the wettability of Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers. Materials and Methods: Thirty single-rooted premolars were decoronated and longitudinally sectioned to form 60 samples. The samples were then arbitrarily separated into three groups (n = 20) determined by the irrigation protocol: Group I (2.5% sodium hypochlorite [NaOCl] + 17% EDTA), Group II (2.5% NaOCl + 7% MA), and Group III (2.5% NaOCl + distilled water). Each group was then split into two subgroups (n = 10) based on the sealer utilized: Subgroup A (Sealer Plus BC sealer) and Subgroup B (AH Plus sealer). The sealers were mixed and placed on the samples. Contact angles of the sealers were determined with a goniometer. The intragroup and intergroup comparison was conducted by Two way-ANOVA test with a significance level of P < 0.01. Results: The wettability of both sealers was favorably influenced by the final irrigant rinse with 7% MA and 17% EDTA, although there was no statistical difference between both sealers in the MA group (P > 0.01). AH Plus demonstrated a better wettability than Sealer Plus BC in the EDTA group (P < 0.001). Both Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers demonstrated lower contact angles on final irrigation with 7% MA in comparison to 17% EDTA. Conclusion: As a final irrigant, 7% MA increased the wettability of both Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus sealers compared to 17% EDTA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信