两种明胶固化剂保存热改变的骨骼遗骸的比较

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Finanzarchiv Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI:10.5744/fa.2020.1021
N. Bishop, Angi M. Christensen
{"title":"两种明胶固化剂保存热改变的骨骼遗骸的比较","authors":"N. Bishop, Angi M. Christensen","doi":"10.5744/fa.2020.1021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent study (Topoleski & Christensen 2019) found that applying a food-grade gelatin solution to thermally altered skeletal remains resulted in significantly better structural preservation (reduced fragmentation) during recovery and transport compared to untreated controls. Here we expand upon this research and test whether a technical-grade gelatin would result in even better skeletal evidence preservation. Results show that bones treated with both the food-grade and technical-grade gelatins were better preserved (i.e., had less fragmentation) than untreated controls. Application of the technical-grade gelatin, however, did not result in significantly better preservation than the food-grade gelatin, and is less accessible, more expensive, and more difficult to prepare. Food-grade gelatin is therefore recommended, but other types of gelatins can be equally effective.","PeriodicalId":45063,"journal":{"name":"Finanzarchiv","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Two Gelatin Consolidants for the Preservation of Thermally Altered Skeletal Remains\",\"authors\":\"N. Bishop, Angi M. Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.5744/fa.2020.1021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recent study (Topoleski & Christensen 2019) found that applying a food-grade gelatin solution to thermally altered skeletal remains resulted in significantly better structural preservation (reduced fragmentation) during recovery and transport compared to untreated controls. Here we expand upon this research and test whether a technical-grade gelatin would result in even better skeletal evidence preservation. Results show that bones treated with both the food-grade and technical-grade gelatins were better preserved (i.e., had less fragmentation) than untreated controls. Application of the technical-grade gelatin, however, did not result in significantly better preservation than the food-grade gelatin, and is less accessible, more expensive, and more difficult to prepare. Food-grade gelatin is therefore recommended, but other types of gelatins can be equally effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finanzarchiv\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finanzarchiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2020.1021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanzarchiv","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2020.1021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的一项研究(Topoleski & Christensen 2019)发现,与未经处理的对照组相比,将食品级明胶溶液应用于热改变的骨骼遗骸,在恢复和运输过程中可以显着更好地保存结构(减少破碎)。在这里,我们将扩展这项研究,并测试技术级明胶是否会导致更好的骨骼证据保存。结果表明,用食品级明胶和技术级明胶处理过的骨头比未处理过的骨头保存得更好(即碎片更少)。然而,技术级明胶的应用并没有显著地比食品级明胶更好地保存,而且更不容易获得,更昂贵,更难以制备。因此,推荐使用食品级明胶,但其他类型的明胶也同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Two Gelatin Consolidants for the Preservation of Thermally Altered Skeletal Remains
A recent study (Topoleski & Christensen 2019) found that applying a food-grade gelatin solution to thermally altered skeletal remains resulted in significantly better structural preservation (reduced fragmentation) during recovery and transport compared to untreated controls. Here we expand upon this research and test whether a technical-grade gelatin would result in even better skeletal evidence preservation. Results show that bones treated with both the food-grade and technical-grade gelatins were better preserved (i.e., had less fragmentation) than untreated controls. Application of the technical-grade gelatin, however, did not result in significantly better preservation than the food-grade gelatin, and is less accessible, more expensive, and more difficult to prepare. Food-grade gelatin is therefore recommended, but other types of gelatins can be equally effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finanzarchiv
Finanzarchiv Multiple-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信