写出有效的选择题

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Finley
{"title":"写出有效的选择题","authors":"S. Finley","doi":"10.4337/9781788975087.00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Multiple-choice questions are used commonly in online courses. They are versatile and efficient, and most course management systems provide a tool that automatically grades this type of question. Multiple-choice tests are reliable, and the higher number of questions a test has, the more reliable it is. For example, in a 25-question test, a student has a 1-out-of-942,651 chance of scoring 70% by guessing alone. These advantages are severely undermined, however, if the questions aren’t well written.","PeriodicalId":53784,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Teaching in Higher Education-Gulf Perspectives","volume":"17 9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing effective multiple choice questions\",\"authors\":\"S. Finley\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781788975087.00046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION Multiple-choice questions are used commonly in online courses. They are versatile and efficient, and most course management systems provide a tool that automatically grades this type of question. Multiple-choice tests are reliable, and the higher number of questions a test has, the more reliable it is. For example, in a 25-question test, a student has a 1-out-of-942,651 chance of scoring 70% by guessing alone. These advantages are severely undermined, however, if the questions aren’t well written.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Teaching in Higher Education-Gulf Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"17 9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Teaching in Higher Education-Gulf Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975087.00046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Teaching in Higher Education-Gulf Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975087.00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

多项选择题在网络课程中被广泛使用。它们用途广泛,效率高,大多数课程管理系统都提供了自动评分这类问题的工具。多项选择题是可靠的,题目越多,可靠性越高。例如,在一个25道题的测试中,一个学生只有1 / 942,651的机会通过猜测获得70%的分数。然而,如果问题写得不好,这些优势就会被严重破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Writing effective multiple choice questions
INTRODUCTION Multiple-choice questions are used commonly in online courses. They are versatile and efficient, and most course management systems provide a tool that automatically grades this type of question. Multiple-choice tests are reliable, and the higher number of questions a test has, the more reliable it is. For example, in a 25-question test, a student has a 1-out-of-942,651 chance of scoring 70% by guessing alone. These advantages are severely undermined, however, if the questions aren’t well written.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信