{"title":"社会主义的理论分析:米塞斯vs布鲁特斯库斯(致《图书》出版一百周年)","authors":"A. Kavaliou","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.1.034-042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the centenary of the publication of books by L. von Mises and B.D. Brutskus dedicated to the criticism of the socialist system. The similarity of the theoretical arguments used by the authors in the analysis of the economic aspects of socialist society makes it possible to call the theorem on the impossibility of socialism the double name of Mises-Bruckus. The authors consider the abolition of the institutions of private property on the means of production, as well as the market as a mechanism for coordination, and entrepreneurship to be the main factor of the rational impossibility of the economic system of socialism. Without these institutions, it is impossible to form a price system as a signaling mechanism about the most efficient directions for the distribution of resources. Without this information, the planning body will not be able to determine the goods that should be produced. Mises' analysis does not focus exclusively on the form of socialism that was realized in Soviet Russia, however it can be applied to any pseudo-socialist system or form of interventionism. Brutskus confirms the theoretical arguments with examples from Soviet practice.","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical Analysis of Socialism: Mises vs. Brutskus (to the Centenary of thе Publications of Books)\",\"authors\":\"A. Kavaliou\",\"doi\":\"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.1.034-042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the centenary of the publication of books by L. von Mises and B.D. Brutskus dedicated to the criticism of the socialist system. The similarity of the theoretical arguments used by the authors in the analysis of the economic aspects of socialist society makes it possible to call the theorem on the impossibility of socialism the double name of Mises-Bruckus. The authors consider the abolition of the institutions of private property on the means of production, as well as the market as a mechanism for coordination, and entrepreneurship to be the main factor of the rational impossibility of the economic system of socialism. Without these institutions, it is impossible to form a price system as a signaling mechanism about the most efficient directions for the distribution of resources. Without this information, the planning body will not be able to determine the goods that should be produced. Mises' analysis does not focus exclusively on the form of socialism that was realized in Soviet Russia, however it can be applied to any pseudo-socialist system or form of interventionism. Brutskus confirms the theoretical arguments with examples from Soviet practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.1.034-042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.1.034-042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章是为了纪念l·冯·米塞斯(L. von Mises)和b·d·布鲁斯库斯(B.D. Brutskus)专门批评社会主义制度的著作出版一百周年。作者在分析社会主义社会的经济方面所使用的理论论据的相似性,使得社会主义不可能定理有可能被称为米塞斯-布鲁克斯的双重名称。作者认为,生产资料私有财产制度的废除,以及作为协调机制的市场和企业家精神是社会主义经济制度理性不可能的主要因素。没有这些制度,就不可能形成一个价格体系,作为资源分配最有效方向的信号机制。没有这些信息,规划机构将无法确定应该生产的商品。米塞斯的分析并不仅仅关注在苏俄实现的社会主义形式,然而它可以应用于任何伪社会主义制度或干涉主义的形式。布鲁特斯库斯用苏联实践的例子证实了这些理论论点。
Theoretical Analysis of Socialism: Mises vs. Brutskus (to the Centenary of thе Publications of Books)
The article is devoted to the centenary of the publication of books by L. von Mises and B.D. Brutskus dedicated to the criticism of the socialist system. The similarity of the theoretical arguments used by the authors in the analysis of the economic aspects of socialist society makes it possible to call the theorem on the impossibility of socialism the double name of Mises-Bruckus. The authors consider the abolition of the institutions of private property on the means of production, as well as the market as a mechanism for coordination, and entrepreneurship to be the main factor of the rational impossibility of the economic system of socialism. Without these institutions, it is impossible to form a price system as a signaling mechanism about the most efficient directions for the distribution of resources. Without this information, the planning body will not be able to determine the goods that should be produced. Mises' analysis does not focus exclusively on the form of socialism that was realized in Soviet Russia, however it can be applied to any pseudo-socialist system or form of interventionism. Brutskus confirms the theoretical arguments with examples from Soviet practice.