{"title":"文章标题土耳其芸苔科韭属部分分类群的数值分类分析","authors":"M. Bona","doi":"10.26650/eurjbiol.2020.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study reveals the relationship between Lepidium campestre, L. spinosum, L. sativum ssp. sativum, L. sativum ssp. spinescens, L. ruderale, L. virginicum, L. perfoliatum, L. vesicarium, L. caespitosum, L. pumilum, L. cartilagineum, L. latifolium, L. lyratum, L. graminifolium, to determine the effectiveness of the characters used in taxonomic classification, and to help solve taxonomical problems of this large genus at the specific and intraspecific levels by comparing the numerical results with classical taxonomic classification. Materials and Methods: This numerical taxonomic study is based on morphological data that come from a wide range of herbarium material and material collected in the wild. For the analyses, 14 taxa were studied. A range of characteristics of sepal, petal, stamen, silicle, pedicel, septum, stigma, and sinus that are considered to be taxonomically important in the genus were investigated. Morphological data, 90 character states, which belong to 55 characters scored as the binary state for each taxon were used in unweighted pair–group method using arithmetic averages and principle components analyses. Results: L. caespitosum, L. pumilum and L. cartilagineum are recognised at species rank, not subspecies or varieties. L. sativum ssp. sativum and L. sativum ssp. spinescens should be evaluated as two subspecies not synonyms of Lepidium sativum. The most effective characters for the delimitation of the studied taxa are seed length, the habitus of plant, sepal length, septum length, seed wings, the presence of swelling leaf residues on the base of the plant, pedicel length. Conclusion: Numerical analysis studies based on morphological data on Lepidium taxa growing in Turkey are a useful tool for solving the taxonomic problems of taxa belonging to the genus Lepidium.","PeriodicalId":9711,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Biology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Taxonomic Analysis on Some Lepidium L. taxa (Brassicaceae) from Turkey\",\"authors\":\"M. Bona\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/eurjbiol.2020.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study reveals the relationship between Lepidium campestre, L. spinosum, L. sativum ssp. sativum, L. sativum ssp. spinescens, L. ruderale, L. virginicum, L. perfoliatum, L. vesicarium, L. caespitosum, L. pumilum, L. cartilagineum, L. latifolium, L. lyratum, L. graminifolium, to determine the effectiveness of the characters used in taxonomic classification, and to help solve taxonomical problems of this large genus at the specific and intraspecific levels by comparing the numerical results with classical taxonomic classification. Materials and Methods: This numerical taxonomic study is based on morphological data that come from a wide range of herbarium material and material collected in the wild. For the analyses, 14 taxa were studied. A range of characteristics of sepal, petal, stamen, silicle, pedicel, septum, stigma, and sinus that are considered to be taxonomically important in the genus were investigated. Morphological data, 90 character states, which belong to 55 characters scored as the binary state for each taxon were used in unweighted pair–group method using arithmetic averages and principle components analyses. Results: L. caespitosum, L. pumilum and L. cartilagineum are recognised at species rank, not subspecies or varieties. L. sativum ssp. sativum and L. sativum ssp. spinescens should be evaluated as two subspecies not synonyms of Lepidium sativum. The most effective characters for the delimitation of the studied taxa are seed length, the habitus of plant, sepal length, septum length, seed wings, the presence of swelling leaf residues on the base of the plant, pedicel length. Conclusion: Numerical analysis studies based on morphological data on Lepidium taxa growing in Turkey are a useful tool for solving the taxonomic problems of taxa belonging to the genus Lepidium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Biology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/eurjbiol.2020.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eurjbiol.2020.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究油菜、棘草、苜蓿的相互关系。sativum, L. sativum;为确定这些性状用于分类分类的有效性,并将数值结果与经典分类分类结果进行比较,以帮助解决这一大属在种内和种内的分类问题。材料和方法:本数值分类研究是基于形态学数据,这些数据来自广泛的植物标本馆材料和野外收集的材料。为了进行分析,研究了14个分类群。研究了该属中被认为具有重要分类学意义的萼片、花瓣、雄蕊、花蕊、花梗、隔、柱头和鼻窦的一系列特征。采用算术平均和主成分分析的方法,对形态学数据进行非加权对群分析,得到90个特征状态,即每个分类单元的55个特征状态。结果:羊草、羊草和软骨羊草在种级上是可识别的,而不是亚种或变种。蓼属植物sativum和L. sativumLepidium sativum应被视为两个亚种而不是同义词。种子长度、植物的习性、萼片长度、隔片长度、种子翅、基部是否有膨大的叶残、花梗长度是划分所研究分类群最有效的特征。结论:基于土耳其Lepidium属植物形态资料的数值分析研究是解决Lepidium属植物分类问题的有效工具。
Numerical Taxonomic Analysis on Some Lepidium L. taxa (Brassicaceae) from Turkey
Objective: This study reveals the relationship between Lepidium campestre, L. spinosum, L. sativum ssp. sativum, L. sativum ssp. spinescens, L. ruderale, L. virginicum, L. perfoliatum, L. vesicarium, L. caespitosum, L. pumilum, L. cartilagineum, L. latifolium, L. lyratum, L. graminifolium, to determine the effectiveness of the characters used in taxonomic classification, and to help solve taxonomical problems of this large genus at the specific and intraspecific levels by comparing the numerical results with classical taxonomic classification. Materials and Methods: This numerical taxonomic study is based on morphological data that come from a wide range of herbarium material and material collected in the wild. For the analyses, 14 taxa were studied. A range of characteristics of sepal, petal, stamen, silicle, pedicel, septum, stigma, and sinus that are considered to be taxonomically important in the genus were investigated. Morphological data, 90 character states, which belong to 55 characters scored as the binary state for each taxon were used in unweighted pair–group method using arithmetic averages and principle components analyses. Results: L. caespitosum, L. pumilum and L. cartilagineum are recognised at species rank, not subspecies or varieties. L. sativum ssp. sativum and L. sativum ssp. spinescens should be evaluated as two subspecies not synonyms of Lepidium sativum. The most effective characters for the delimitation of the studied taxa are seed length, the habitus of plant, sepal length, septum length, seed wings, the presence of swelling leaf residues on the base of the plant, pedicel length. Conclusion: Numerical analysis studies based on morphological data on Lepidium taxa growing in Turkey are a useful tool for solving the taxonomic problems of taxa belonging to the genus Lepidium.