2型糖尿病患者Friedewald方的可靠性及其与糖尿病调节中血脂的关系

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Didem Barlak Keti, S. Muhtaroğlu
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者Friedewald方的可靠性及其与糖尿病调节中血脂的关系","authors":"Didem Barlak Keti, S. Muhtaroğlu","doi":"10.2478/rrlm-2021-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Many laboratories utilize Friedewald formula (FF) to analyze LDL cholesterol levels of patients including diabetes mellitus (DM). Therefore, it is essential to consider the coherence of results acquired by FF and direct measurement. The number of studies that investigated the effect of lipid parameters, especially TG/HDL cholesterol ratio, on the difference between the two methods is limited. The study was designed to compare LDL cholesterol values obtained by using FF with direct measurement, and to evaluate the relationship between diabetes regulation and lipid profile. Material and Methods: In the cross-sectional study, 529 type 2 DM patients and 1703 non-DM subjects were divided into four groups regarding TG concentrations. Unlike other studies, the study focuses on direct LDL (DLDL) cholesterol levels obtained with the help of different DLDL cholesterol kits (n=20). The correlations were implemented between HbA1c and lipid profiles. Results: It was determined that the bias% was over 10% in 24% of patients with 100-199 mg/dL TG levels. The parameter revealed that the most significant difference and the strongest correlation with HbA1c was TG/HDL cholesterol ratio in patients with type 2 DM. Conclusions: In patients with type 2 DM, even if it was TG <200 mg/dL, LDL calculated with FF should be evaluated together with the TG/HDL cholesterol ratio. Otherwise, direct measurement can be recommended. This ratio is related to diabetes regulation and may be used to monitor patients..","PeriodicalId":49599,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator","volume":"5 1 1","pages":"179 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Friedewald formula in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its relation to lipid profile in diabetes regulation\",\"authors\":\"Didem Barlak Keti, S. Muhtaroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/rrlm-2021-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction: Many laboratories utilize Friedewald formula (FF) to analyze LDL cholesterol levels of patients including diabetes mellitus (DM). Therefore, it is essential to consider the coherence of results acquired by FF and direct measurement. The number of studies that investigated the effect of lipid parameters, especially TG/HDL cholesterol ratio, on the difference between the two methods is limited. The study was designed to compare LDL cholesterol values obtained by using FF with direct measurement, and to evaluate the relationship between diabetes regulation and lipid profile. Material and Methods: In the cross-sectional study, 529 type 2 DM patients and 1703 non-DM subjects were divided into four groups regarding TG concentrations. Unlike other studies, the study focuses on direct LDL (DLDL) cholesterol levels obtained with the help of different DLDL cholesterol kits (n=20). The correlations were implemented between HbA1c and lipid profiles. Results: It was determined that the bias% was over 10% in 24% of patients with 100-199 mg/dL TG levels. The parameter revealed that the most significant difference and the strongest correlation with HbA1c was TG/HDL cholesterol ratio in patients with type 2 DM. Conclusions: In patients with type 2 DM, even if it was TG <200 mg/dL, LDL calculated with FF should be evaluated together with the TG/HDL cholesterol ratio. Otherwise, direct measurement can be recommended. This ratio is related to diabetes regulation and may be used to monitor patients..\",\"PeriodicalId\":49599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator\",\"volume\":\"5 1 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2021-0007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2021-0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要简介:许多实验室使用弗里德瓦尔德公式(FF)分析包括糖尿病(DM)在内的患者的LDL胆固醇水平。因此,必须考虑FF和直接测量结果的一致性。研究脂质参数,特别是TG/HDL胆固醇比值对两种方法差异影响的研究数量有限。本研究旨在比较FF法与直接测量法获得的LDL胆固醇值,并评估糖尿病调节与血脂之间的关系。材料与方法:在横断面研究中,529例2型糖尿病患者和1703例非糖尿病患者根据TG浓度分为四组。与其他研究不同的是,该研究侧重于通过不同的DLDL胆固醇试剂盒获得的直接LDL (DLDL)胆固醇水平(n=20)。在HbA1c和血脂之间实现相关性。结果:在24%的TG水平为100-199 mg/dL的患者中,确定偏差%超过10%。该参数显示,2型DM患者TG/HDL胆固醇比值与HbA1c差异最显著,相关性最强。结论:2型DM患者即使TG <200 mg/dL,也应将FF计算的LDL与TG/HDL胆固醇比值结合评估。否则,建议直接测量。该比值与糖尿病调节有关,可用于监测患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of Friedewald formula in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its relation to lipid profile in diabetes regulation
Abstract Introduction: Many laboratories utilize Friedewald formula (FF) to analyze LDL cholesterol levels of patients including diabetes mellitus (DM). Therefore, it is essential to consider the coherence of results acquired by FF and direct measurement. The number of studies that investigated the effect of lipid parameters, especially TG/HDL cholesterol ratio, on the difference between the two methods is limited. The study was designed to compare LDL cholesterol values obtained by using FF with direct measurement, and to evaluate the relationship between diabetes regulation and lipid profile. Material and Methods: In the cross-sectional study, 529 type 2 DM patients and 1703 non-DM subjects were divided into four groups regarding TG concentrations. Unlike other studies, the study focuses on direct LDL (DLDL) cholesterol levels obtained with the help of different DLDL cholesterol kits (n=20). The correlations were implemented between HbA1c and lipid profiles. Results: It was determined that the bias% was over 10% in 24% of patients with 100-199 mg/dL TG levels. The parameter revealed that the most significant difference and the strongest correlation with HbA1c was TG/HDL cholesterol ratio in patients with type 2 DM. Conclusions: In patients with type 2 DM, even if it was TG <200 mg/dL, LDL calculated with FF should be evaluated together with the TG/HDL cholesterol ratio. Otherwise, direct measurement can be recommended. This ratio is related to diabetes regulation and may be used to monitor patients..
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator
Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
0.31
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to publish new information that would lead to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of production of human diseases, their prevention and diagnosis as early as possible and to monitor therapy and the development of the health of patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信