{"title":"[期刊影响因子作为评价研究者和研究的参数]。","authors":"K. Kaltenborn, Klaus Kuhn","doi":"10.4321/S1130-01082004000700004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The journal impact factor (IF), which is published annually by the Institute for Scientific Information, (Philadelphia, USA), is meanwhile in widespread use as a scientometric parameter for the evaluation of research and researchers in Germany and other European countries. The present article subjects the IF to critical analysis. It first deals with processes of production, transfer, and use of medical knowledge, because the IF intervenes in these processes on account of its reflexivity. Secondary effects of the IF resulting from its reflexivity are discussed with the focus on the level of the author, the journal and the medical discipline as well as on social knowledge processes in society. In addition, the extent to which the IF is appropriate for evaluating the quality of a specific article, of a journal or of individual and collective research achievements is discussed. The present article calls for (1) research evaluation in accordance with the recommendations of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) and of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies) and (2) more intensive occupation with and organization of medical knowledge processes.","PeriodicalId":18420,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik","volume":"15 1","pages":"153-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research].\",\"authors\":\"K. Kaltenborn, Klaus Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.4321/S1130-01082004000700004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The journal impact factor (IF), which is published annually by the Institute for Scientific Information, (Philadelphia, USA), is meanwhile in widespread use as a scientometric parameter for the evaluation of research and researchers in Germany and other European countries. The present article subjects the IF to critical analysis. It first deals with processes of production, transfer, and use of medical knowledge, because the IF intervenes in these processes on account of its reflexivity. Secondary effects of the IF resulting from its reflexivity are discussed with the focus on the level of the author, the journal and the medical discipline as well as on social knowledge processes in society. In addition, the extent to which the IF is appropriate for evaluating the quality of a specific article, of a journal or of individual and collective research achievements is discussed. The present article calls for (1) research evaluation in accordance with the recommendations of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) and of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies) and (2) more intensive occupation with and organization of medical knowledge processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"153-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4321/S1130-01082004000700004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4321/S1130-01082004000700004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44
摘要
美国费城科学信息研究所(Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, USA)每年发布的期刊影响因子(journal impact factor, IF)在德国和其他欧洲国家被广泛用作科学计量参数,用于评价研究和研究人员。本文对IF进行了批判性分析。它首先处理医学知识的生产、转移和使用过程,因为IF由于其反身性而介入这些过程。本文从作者、期刊和医学学科的层面以及社会中的社会知识过程等方面讨论了IF的反身性所产生的次生效应。此外,本文还讨论了影响因子在多大程度上适合于评估特定文章、期刊或个人和集体研究成果的质量。本文呼吁(1)根据德国研究委员会(Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)和科学医学学会协会(Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften)的建议进行研究评估,(2)更深入地从事和组织医学知识过程。
[The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research].
The journal impact factor (IF), which is published annually by the Institute for Scientific Information, (Philadelphia, USA), is meanwhile in widespread use as a scientometric parameter for the evaluation of research and researchers in Germany and other European countries. The present article subjects the IF to critical analysis. It first deals with processes of production, transfer, and use of medical knowledge, because the IF intervenes in these processes on account of its reflexivity. Secondary effects of the IF resulting from its reflexivity are discussed with the focus on the level of the author, the journal and the medical discipline as well as on social knowledge processes in society. In addition, the extent to which the IF is appropriate for evaluating the quality of a specific article, of a journal or of individual and collective research achievements is discussed. The present article calls for (1) research evaluation in accordance with the recommendations of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) and of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies) and (2) more intensive occupation with and organization of medical knowledge processes.