对交叉性制度化动态的批判性评论

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Uxue Zugaza Goienetxea
{"title":"对交叉性制度化动态的批判性评论","authors":"Uxue Zugaza Goienetxea","doi":"10.3989/ris.2020.78.1.18.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper relates the institutionalization of intersectionality and the critics about the lack of its genealogy inspired by the intellectual and activist trajectories of women of color . The text suggests that the loose of radicalness responds to four dynamics of institutionalization of intersectionality. These are: 1) the forget of the genealogy of colour and the ethos of social justice, 2) an epistemological shift to the discipline and standardization, 3) the hegemony of the global North’s scientific productions as opposed to those of global South and 4) the politics of innovation and the diversity market within a neoliberal context.","PeriodicalId":45827,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apuntes críticos sobre las dinámicas de institucionalización de la interseccionalidad\",\"authors\":\"Uxue Zugaza Goienetxea\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/ris.2020.78.1.18.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper relates the institutionalization of intersectionality and the critics about the lack of its genealogy inspired by the intellectual and activist trajectories of women of color . The text suggests that the loose of radicalness responds to four dynamics of institutionalization of intersectionality. These are: 1) the forget of the genealogy of colour and the ethos of social justice, 2) an epistemological shift to the discipline and standardization, 3) the hegemony of the global North’s scientific productions as opposed to those of global South and 4) the politics of innovation and the diversity market within a neoliberal context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Internacional De Sociologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Internacional De Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2020.78.1.18.145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2020.78.1.18.145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文论述了交叉性的制度化,以及受有色人种女性的知识分子和活动轨迹启发而缺乏交叉性谱系的批评。本文认为激进性的松散是对交叉性制度化的四个动力的回应。它们是:1)对颜色谱系和社会正义精神的遗忘,2)向纪律和标准化的认识论转变,3)全球北方的科学成果的霸权,而不是全球南方的霸权,4)新自由主义背景下的创新政治和多样性市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Apuntes críticos sobre las dinámicas de institucionalización de la interseccionalidad
This paper relates the institutionalization of intersectionality and the critics about the lack of its genealogy inspired by the intellectual and activist trajectories of women of color . The text suggests that the loose of radicalness responds to four dynamics of institutionalization of intersectionality. These are: 1) the forget of the genealogy of colour and the ethos of social justice, 2) an epistemological shift to the discipline and standardization, 3) the hegemony of the global North’s scientific productions as opposed to those of global South and 4) the politics of innovation and the diversity market within a neoliberal context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信