焦虑障碍的治疗结果评价方法:优势和关键问题

David H Barlow
{"title":"焦虑障碍的治疗结果评价方法:优势和关键问题","authors":"David H Barlow","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90017-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Methodology in the conduct of clinical outcome studies with anxiety disorders has advanced in several areas in recent years. Nevertheless, difficult issues concerning the conduct and interpretation of the results of these clinical trials remain. Developments that have facilitated clinical trials include the construction of structured interviews for anxiety and related disorders that allow consistency in identification of target disorders in a clinical context. An equally important development has been the introduction and widespread utilization of treatment manuals which allows for replicable independent variables. Remaining issues include ascertaining the optimal way of measuring change from among the variety of dependent variables available. A related difficulty is determination of the principle dependent variable (e.g., panic attacks, intrusive thoughts) in an anxiety disorder where many key features of anxiety disorders seem to coexist (symptom and syndrome comorbidity). Solving these issues as well as determining the optimal way to handle attrition will provide important methodological advances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 121-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90017-9","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment outcome evaluation methodology with anxiety disorders: Strengths and key issues\",\"authors\":\"David H Barlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90017-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Methodology in the conduct of clinical outcome studies with anxiety disorders has advanced in several areas in recent years. Nevertheless, difficult issues concerning the conduct and interpretation of the results of these clinical trials remain. Developments that have facilitated clinical trials include the construction of structured interviews for anxiety and related disorders that allow consistency in identification of target disorders in a clinical context. An equally important development has been the introduction and widespread utilization of treatment manuals which allows for replicable independent variables. Remaining issues include ascertaining the optimal way of measuring change from among the variety of dependent variables available. A related difficulty is determination of the principle dependent variable (e.g., panic attacks, intrusive thoughts) in an anxiety disorder where many key features of anxiety disorders seem to coexist (symptom and syndrome comorbidity). Solving these issues as well as determining the optimal way to handle attrition will provide important methodological advances.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 121-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90017-9\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

近年来,焦虑障碍临床结果研究的方法学在几个领域取得了进展。然而,有关这些临床试验结果的实施和解释的难题仍然存在。促进临床试验的发展包括构建焦虑和相关疾病的结构化访谈,从而在临床背景下确定目标疾病的一致性。一个同样重要的发展是采用和广泛使用允许可复制的独立变量的治疗手册。剩下的问题包括确定从各种可用的因变量中测量变化的最佳方法。一个相关的困难是确定焦虑障碍的主要因变量(例如,惊恐发作,侵入性思想),其中焦虑障碍的许多关键特征似乎并存(症状和综合征共病)。解决这些问题以及确定处理人员流失的最佳方法将提供重要的方法进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment outcome evaluation methodology with anxiety disorders: Strengths and key issues

Methodology in the conduct of clinical outcome studies with anxiety disorders has advanced in several areas in recent years. Nevertheless, difficult issues concerning the conduct and interpretation of the results of these clinical trials remain. Developments that have facilitated clinical trials include the construction of structured interviews for anxiety and related disorders that allow consistency in identification of target disorders in a clinical context. An equally important development has been the introduction and widespread utilization of treatment manuals which allows for replicable independent variables. Remaining issues include ascertaining the optimal way of measuring change from among the variety of dependent variables available. A related difficulty is determination of the principle dependent variable (e.g., panic attacks, intrusive thoughts) in an anxiety disorder where many key features of anxiety disorders seem to coexist (symptom and syndrome comorbidity). Solving these issues as well as determining the optimal way to handle attrition will provide important methodological advances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信