使用形态学滤波图像的密度测量动脉病变大小

E. Byrom, B. Alexander, T. Frohlich, D. Hueter
{"title":"使用形态学滤波图像的密度测量动脉病变大小","authors":"E. Byrom, B. Alexander, T. Frohlich, D. Hueter","doi":"10.1109/CIC.1993.378333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Densitometric measurement of coronary artery narrowing requires a correction for the nonarterial contributions to the density (\"background\"). Two correction methods were studied. The first samples background in two strips of pixel parallel to the artery edges, and excludes nearby arteries. The second method measures density on a morphologically filtered image with no additional background correction. Measurements of % narrowing are consistent, reproducible and well correlated between the two methods. The first method corrects completely for background, the second less so. Using a set of routine arteriograms, densitometric % narrowing correlates with the visual estimate. Both methods underestimate lesion severity. Morphological filtering was less variable when comparing values measured on different views of same lesion.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":20445,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference","volume":"9 1","pages":"591-594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Densitometric arterial lesion size using morphologically filtered images\",\"authors\":\"E. Byrom, B. Alexander, T. Frohlich, D. Hueter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIC.1993.378333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Densitometric measurement of coronary artery narrowing requires a correction for the nonarterial contributions to the density (\\\"background\\\"). Two correction methods were studied. The first samples background in two strips of pixel parallel to the artery edges, and excludes nearby arteries. The second method measures density on a morphologically filtered image with no additional background correction. Measurements of % narrowing are consistent, reproducible and well correlated between the two methods. The first method corrects completely for background, the second less so. Using a set of routine arteriograms, densitometric % narrowing correlates with the visual estimate. Both methods underestimate lesion severity. Morphological filtering was less variable when comparing values measured on different views of same lesion.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"591-594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.1993.378333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.1993.378333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冠状动脉狭窄的密度测量需要校正非动脉对密度的影响(“背景”)。研究了两种校正方法。首先在两条平行于动脉边缘的像素条中采样背景,并排除附近的动脉。第二种方法在没有额外背景校正的情况下测量形态学滤波图像上的密度。两种方法之间的测量结果一致,可重复性好,相关性好。第一种方法完全校正了背景,第二种方法就不那么校正了。使用一组常规动脉造影,密度计狭窄与目测值相关。两种方法都低估了病变的严重程度。形态学滤波在比较同一病变不同视图上测量的值时变化较小
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Densitometric arterial lesion size using morphologically filtered images
Densitometric measurement of coronary artery narrowing requires a correction for the nonarterial contributions to the density ("background"). Two correction methods were studied. The first samples background in two strips of pixel parallel to the artery edges, and excludes nearby arteries. The second method measures density on a morphologically filtered image with no additional background correction. Measurements of % narrowing are consistent, reproducible and well correlated between the two methods. The first method corrects completely for background, the second less so. Using a set of routine arteriograms, densitometric % narrowing correlates with the visual estimate. Both methods underestimate lesion severity. Morphological filtering was less variable when comparing values measured on different views of same lesion.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信