走向德国和美国的后批判公共领域

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Telos Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3817/0922200067
R. Berman
{"title":"走向德国和美国的后批判公共领域","authors":"R. Berman","doi":"10.3817/0922200067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern understanding of the public sphere is inseparable from criticism: the public is the space in which criticism can be articulated most effectively. The critical public emerged historically as a platform for individuals to call into question the decisions of state authority, especially when those decisions were taken outside the public view, as was typical for the premodern state—although the penchant for secrecy in government certainly lives on today. The public sphere stretches across multiple fields: individual discussion, journalistic reportage and evaluation, and deliberative parliamentary institutions, no matter how much current legislatures fail on that score. In a broad…","PeriodicalId":43573,"journal":{"name":"Telos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Post-Critical Public Sphere in Germany and the United States\",\"authors\":\"R. Berman\",\"doi\":\"10.3817/0922200067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modern understanding of the public sphere is inseparable from criticism: the public is the space in which criticism can be articulated most effectively. The critical public emerged historically as a platform for individuals to call into question the decisions of state authority, especially when those decisions were taken outside the public view, as was typical for the premodern state—although the penchant for secrecy in government certainly lives on today. The public sphere stretches across multiple fields: individual discussion, journalistic reportage and evaluation, and deliberative parliamentary institutions, no matter how much current legislatures fail on that score. In a broad…\",\"PeriodicalId\":43573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3817/0922200067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3817/0922200067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对公共领域的现代理解与批评是分不开的:公共是批评可以最有效地表达的空间。从历史上看,批判性公众是作为个人质疑国家权威决策的平台而出现的,尤其是当这些决策是在公众视野之外做出的时候,就像前现代国家的典型情况一样——尽管政府对保密的偏好肯定存在于今天。公共领域横跨多个领域:个人讨论,新闻报道和评估,以及审议议会机构,无论当前的立法机构在这方面有多么失败。在一个广泛的…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a Post-Critical Public Sphere in Germany and the United States
The modern understanding of the public sphere is inseparable from criticism: the public is the space in which criticism can be articulated most effectively. The critical public emerged historically as a platform for individuals to call into question the decisions of state authority, especially when those decisions were taken outside the public view, as was typical for the premodern state—although the penchant for secrecy in government certainly lives on today. The public sphere stretches across multiple fields: individual discussion, journalistic reportage and evaluation, and deliberative parliamentary institutions, no matter how much current legislatures fail on that score. In a broad…
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telos
Telos Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信