提高美国体育教学质量的国家课程可行性评估

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Junghwan Oh, K. Graber, Amelia Mays Woods, T. Templin
{"title":"提高美国体育教学质量的国家课程可行性评估","authors":"Junghwan Oh, K. Graber, Amelia Mays Woods, T. Templin","doi":"10.1080/00336297.2021.2003831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In response to the global pressure that has led to an increased emphasis on international comparisons of student achievement since the 1980s, multiple federal reforms aimed at producing greater consistency in curricula have been initiated in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a national curriculum and whether it has the potential to improve the quality of physical education. Twenty-eight national leaders in physical education teacher education participated in formal and informal interviews. The themes that emerged indicated a uniform curriculum would not be readily realized or successfully implemented in the US due to the polyphonic governance structure and anti-federal sentiment, and widespread convictions among the educational community about an idiosyncratic curriculum approach.","PeriodicalId":49642,"journal":{"name":"Quest","volume":"16 1","pages":"37 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the Feasibility of a National Curriculum for Improving the Quality of Physical Education in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Junghwan Oh, K. Graber, Amelia Mays Woods, T. Templin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00336297.2021.2003831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In response to the global pressure that has led to an increased emphasis on international comparisons of student achievement since the 1980s, multiple federal reforms aimed at producing greater consistency in curricula have been initiated in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a national curriculum and whether it has the potential to improve the quality of physical education. Twenty-eight national leaders in physical education teacher education participated in formal and informal interviews. The themes that emerged indicated a uniform curriculum would not be readily realized or successfully implemented in the US due to the polyphonic governance structure and anti-federal sentiment, and widespread convictions among the educational community about an idiosyncratic curriculum approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quest\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2021.2003831\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quest","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2021.2003831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

自20世纪80年代以来,全球压力导致越来越重视学生成绩的国际比较,为了应对这一压力,美国启动了多项旨在提高课程一致性的联邦改革。本研究的目的是探讨国家课程的可行性,以及它是否有可能提高体育教育的质量。28名国家体育教师教育领导参加了正式和非正式的访谈。出现的主题表明,由于复调的治理结构和反联邦情绪,以及教育界对特殊课程方法的普遍信念,统一课程在美国不会轻易实现或成功实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the Feasibility of a National Curriculum for Improving the Quality of Physical Education in the United States
ABSTRACT In response to the global pressure that has led to an increased emphasis on international comparisons of student achievement since the 1980s, multiple federal reforms aimed at producing greater consistency in curricula have been initiated in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a national curriculum and whether it has the potential to improve the quality of physical education. Twenty-eight national leaders in physical education teacher education participated in formal and informal interviews. The themes that emerged indicated a uniform curriculum would not be readily realized or successfully implemented in the US due to the polyphonic governance structure and anti-federal sentiment, and widespread convictions among the educational community about an idiosyncratic curriculum approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quest
Quest 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Quest is the official journal of the National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education (NAKHE). It is the leading journal for interdisciplinary scholarship for professionals in kinesiology in higher education. Quest provides a public forum for scholarship, creative thought, and research relevant to a broad range of interests held by faculty and leaders in higher education today. Quest publishes: 1) manuscripts that address issues and concerns relevant and meaningful to the field of kinesiology; 2) original research reports that address empirical questions that are contextualized within higher education and hold significance to a broad range of faculty and administrators in kinesiology; and 3) reviews of literature and/or research of interest to one or more sub-disciplines in kinesiology. Quest does not publish papers focused on sport (e.g., amateur, collegiate, professional) that are contextualized outside of kinesiology in higher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信