“有条件的”公民吗?当代印度街头(和法院)的小贩

Q3 Social Sciences
Kunal Joshi
{"title":"“有条件的”公民吗?当代印度街头(和法院)的小贩","authors":"Kunal Joshi","doi":"10.4000/ARTICULO.3383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Street vendors have often been seen as archetypal examples of informality in cities—constituting what Chatterjee (2004), for instance, has called political society—indispensable to the city, but continually having to negotiate the law, their claims to citizenship perpetually tenuous. Using Chatterjee’s framework as a guide, I look at how the movement for street vendors’ rights has evolved in India over the last few decades. I have studied the legal as well as political struggle waged by various street vendors’ groups over the last decade, which eventually culminated in a national law legalizing street vending in India in 2014. That this law was passed amid increasingly strong aspirations for (hawker-free) 'world-class' cities on the part of the middle class is in itself significant, but shows, more importantly, how the Indian street vendor, far from seeking exceptions to the law, is increasingly demanding to be let in to the governmental gaze of the state. Although there have been many problems with the implementation of the bill since its passage, I argue that by institutionalizing a right to vend, the campaign which led to the bill has created new possibilities for vendors to negotiate with the state at all levels.","PeriodicalId":38124,"journal":{"name":"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Conditional’ Citizens? Hawkers in the Streets (and the Courts) of Contemporary India\",\"authors\":\"Kunal Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/ARTICULO.3383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Street vendors have often been seen as archetypal examples of informality in cities—constituting what Chatterjee (2004), for instance, has called political society—indispensable to the city, but continually having to negotiate the law, their claims to citizenship perpetually tenuous. Using Chatterjee’s framework as a guide, I look at how the movement for street vendors’ rights has evolved in India over the last few decades. I have studied the legal as well as political struggle waged by various street vendors’ groups over the last decade, which eventually culminated in a national law legalizing street vending in India in 2014. That this law was passed amid increasingly strong aspirations for (hawker-free) 'world-class' cities on the part of the middle class is in itself significant, but shows, more importantly, how the Indian street vendor, far from seeking exceptions to the law, is increasingly demanding to be let in to the governmental gaze of the state. Although there have been many problems with the implementation of the bill since its passage, I argue that by institutionalizing a right to vend, the campaign which led to the bill has created new possibilities for vendors to negotiate with the state at all levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/ARTICULO.3383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/ARTICULO.3383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

街头小贩经常被视为城市非正式性的典型例子——例如,他们构成了Chatterjee(2004)所称的政治社会——对城市来说不可或缺,但他们不断地与法律谈判,他们对公民身份的要求永远是脆弱的。以查特吉的框架为指导,我来看看过去几十年来印度街头小贩权利运动是如何演变的。我研究了过去十年来各种街头摊贩团体发起的法律和政治斗争,最终在2014年印度通过了一项使街头摊贩合法化的国家法律。这项法律是在越来越强烈的(无小贩)愿望中通过的。中产阶级的“世界级”城市本身就很重要,但更重要的是,它表明,印度街头小贩远非寻求法律例外,而是越来越多地要求进入政府的视线。尽管自法案通过以来,在实施过程中存在许多问题,但我认为,通过将销售权制度化,导致该法案的运动为供应商与各级政府谈判创造了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Conditional’ Citizens? Hawkers in the Streets (and the Courts) of Contemporary India
Street vendors have often been seen as archetypal examples of informality in cities—constituting what Chatterjee (2004), for instance, has called political society—indispensable to the city, but continually having to negotiate the law, their claims to citizenship perpetually tenuous. Using Chatterjee’s framework as a guide, I look at how the movement for street vendors’ rights has evolved in India over the last few decades. I have studied the legal as well as political struggle waged by various street vendors’ groups over the last decade, which eventually culminated in a national law legalizing street vending in India in 2014. That this law was passed amid increasingly strong aspirations for (hawker-free) 'world-class' cities on the part of the middle class is in itself significant, but shows, more importantly, how the Indian street vendor, far from seeking exceptions to the law, is increasingly demanding to be let in to the governmental gaze of the state. Although there have been many problems with the implementation of the bill since its passage, I argue that by institutionalizing a right to vend, the campaign which led to the bill has created new possibilities for vendors to negotiate with the state at all levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Articulo - Journal of Urban Research
Articulo - Journal of Urban Research Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信