职场道德与个人/职业道德冲突对母亲和助产士的情感影响

PhD, EM RN, FRCNA Faye E. Thompson
{"title":"职场道德与个人/职业道德冲突对母亲和助产士的情感影响","authors":"PhD, EM RN, FRCNA Faye E. Thompson","doi":"10.1016/S1448-8272(05)80025-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research problem</h3><p>The way we see or interpret our social world determines how we are and how we act (our ‘being with’) in that world. Midwifery is currently promoting a partnership model of practice (<span>Guilliland &amp; Pairman 1995</span>). Workplace Codes and policies usually promote universal ethical principles and objective ethical decision-making both of which exclude so called subjective aspects such as emotions, context and relationship (<span>Thompson 2004</span>).</p><p>A qualitative study conducted in Australia, explored the implicit and explicit ethics surrounding childbirth, including the ethical nature of the mother-midwife relationship. One aspect of that research analysed the impact of any conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics, as expressed by participating mothers and midwives. This paper discusses one of the emergent themes, ‘Emotions and Feelings’.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Eight women who had recently birthed a baby, and eight currently practicing midwives recruited from a variety of birthing and midwifery practice areas in Queensland, including public and private health care categories. Method Narrative inquiry was guided by feminist constructivism and feminist ethics. Through in-depth interviews, participants told of their personal experiences, and described how they felt when an encounter with either a midwife or doctor was ethically unsatisfactory for them. Participants were co-researchers in that during both the interview and analysis process, feedback was sought from them to validate the researcher's interpretation and jointly construct consensual meanings.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Conflict between workplace/service provider ethics and personal/professional ethics has an emotional impact according to the mothers and midwives interviewed for the present research.</p></div><div><h3>Implication</h3><p>A significant implication of the research is that ethical midwifery practice and decision-making ought to include not exclude, the emotions and feelings of consumers and practitioners. Emotions are our response to a social situation, and reflect our cognitive belief of concepts such as justice and integrity: when we know something is ‘wrong’ we are sad, or angry, or feel ‘bad’. Rarely do we search for which ethical principle has been breached. Ethical practice is based on human engagement in relationship, not merely abstract principles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100149,"journal":{"name":"Australian Midwifery","volume":"18 3","pages":"Pages 17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1448-8272(05)80025-2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The emotional impact on mothers and midwives of conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics\",\"authors\":\"PhD, EM RN, FRCNA Faye E. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1448-8272(05)80025-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Research problem</h3><p>The way we see or interpret our social world determines how we are and how we act (our ‘being with’) in that world. Midwifery is currently promoting a partnership model of practice (<span>Guilliland &amp; Pairman 1995</span>). Workplace Codes and policies usually promote universal ethical principles and objective ethical decision-making both of which exclude so called subjective aspects such as emotions, context and relationship (<span>Thompson 2004</span>).</p><p>A qualitative study conducted in Australia, explored the implicit and explicit ethics surrounding childbirth, including the ethical nature of the mother-midwife relationship. One aspect of that research analysed the impact of any conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics, as expressed by participating mothers and midwives. This paper discusses one of the emergent themes, ‘Emotions and Feelings’.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Eight women who had recently birthed a baby, and eight currently practicing midwives recruited from a variety of birthing and midwifery practice areas in Queensland, including public and private health care categories. Method Narrative inquiry was guided by feminist constructivism and feminist ethics. Through in-depth interviews, participants told of their personal experiences, and described how they felt when an encounter with either a midwife or doctor was ethically unsatisfactory for them. Participants were co-researchers in that during both the interview and analysis process, feedback was sought from them to validate the researcher's interpretation and jointly construct consensual meanings.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Conflict between workplace/service provider ethics and personal/professional ethics has an emotional impact according to the mothers and midwives interviewed for the present research.</p></div><div><h3>Implication</h3><p>A significant implication of the research is that ethical midwifery practice and decision-making ought to include not exclude, the emotions and feelings of consumers and practitioners. Emotions are our response to a social situation, and reflect our cognitive belief of concepts such as justice and integrity: when we know something is ‘wrong’ we are sad, or angry, or feel ‘bad’. Rarely do we search for which ethical principle has been breached. Ethical practice is based on human engagement in relationship, not merely abstract principles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 17-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1448-8272(05)80025-2\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1448827205800252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1448827205800252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

研究问题我们看待或解释社会世界的方式决定了我们在这个世界上的样子和行为(我们的“存在”)。助产学目前正在推广合作模式(Guilliland &Pairman 1995)。工作场所规范和政策通常促进普遍的道德原则和客观的道德决策,这两者都排除了所谓的主观方面,如情绪,背景和关系(Thompson 2004)。在澳大利亚进行的一项定性研究探讨了围绕分娩的隐性和显性伦理,包括母婴关系的伦理本质。该研究的一个方面分析了工作场所和个人/职业道德之间任何冲突的影响,正如参与研究的母亲和助产士所表达的那样。本文讨论了一个新兴的主题,“情绪与感受”。参与者:8名刚生过孩子的妇女和8名正在执业的助产士,他们来自昆士兰州的各种分娩和助产实践领域,包括公共和私人医疗保健类别。方法以女性主义建构主义和女性主义伦理学为指导进行叙事探究。通过深度访谈,参与者讲述了他们的个人经历,并描述了当他们遇到助产士或医生时,他们的感受。参与者是共同研究人员,在访谈和分析过程中,都从他们那里寻求反馈,以验证研究者的解释,并共同构建共识意义。调查结果根据接受本研究采访的母亲和助产士,工作场所/服务提供者道德与个人/职业道德之间的冲突会对情感产生影响。本研究的一个重要意义是,道德助产实践和决策应该包括而不是排除消费者和从业者的情绪和感受。情绪是我们对社会状况的反应,反映了我们对正义和正直等概念的认知信念:当我们知道某些事情是“错误的”时,我们会感到悲伤、愤怒或感觉“不好”。我们很少去寻找哪条道德原则被违背了。道德实践是建立在人际关系的基础上的,而不仅仅是抽象的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The emotional impact on mothers and midwives of conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics

Research problem

The way we see or interpret our social world determines how we are and how we act (our ‘being with’) in that world. Midwifery is currently promoting a partnership model of practice (Guilliland & Pairman 1995). Workplace Codes and policies usually promote universal ethical principles and objective ethical decision-making both of which exclude so called subjective aspects such as emotions, context and relationship (Thompson 2004).

A qualitative study conducted in Australia, explored the implicit and explicit ethics surrounding childbirth, including the ethical nature of the mother-midwife relationship. One aspect of that research analysed the impact of any conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics, as expressed by participating mothers and midwives. This paper discusses one of the emergent themes, ‘Emotions and Feelings’.

Participants

Eight women who had recently birthed a baby, and eight currently practicing midwives recruited from a variety of birthing and midwifery practice areas in Queensland, including public and private health care categories. Method Narrative inquiry was guided by feminist constructivism and feminist ethics. Through in-depth interviews, participants told of their personal experiences, and described how they felt when an encounter with either a midwife or doctor was ethically unsatisfactory for them. Participants were co-researchers in that during both the interview and analysis process, feedback was sought from them to validate the researcher's interpretation and jointly construct consensual meanings.

Findings

Conflict between workplace/service provider ethics and personal/professional ethics has an emotional impact according to the mothers and midwives interviewed for the present research.

Implication

A significant implication of the research is that ethical midwifery practice and decision-making ought to include not exclude, the emotions and feelings of consumers and practitioners. Emotions are our response to a social situation, and reflect our cognitive belief of concepts such as justice and integrity: when we know something is ‘wrong’ we are sad, or angry, or feel ‘bad’. Rarely do we search for which ethical principle has been breached. Ethical practice is based on human engagement in relationship, not merely abstract principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信