“爸爸日营”中主要人物的嘲讽与回避格言研究

M. Helmi
{"title":"“爸爸日营”中主要人物的嘲讽与回避格言研究","authors":"M. Helmi","doi":"10.31539/leea.v6i1.1431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focused on analyzing flouting and hedging maxims used by the main characters on \"Daddy Day Camp\". The purposes of this research were to investigate and analyze how the maxims are flouted and hedged by the main characters on \"Daddy Day Camp\". Qualitative method was used in this research because the data were in the form of words rather than that of numbers and statistics. The data were taken from the utterances spoken by the main characters on \"Daddy Day Camp\". After the data are collected, they are classified and analyzed based on Grice’s Cooperative principle theory. This research found many maxims of cooperative principle which were flouted and hedged by the main characters on \"Daddy Day Camp\", especially the maxim of quality and quantity. On the other hand, this research also found that the utterances spoken by the main characters hedged the maxims of cooperative principle. There were some utterances which hedge the maxim of quality and relevance because the utterances which were spoken by the main characters are not totally accurate but seem informative, well founded and relevant. \nKeywords: Daddy Day Camp, Flouting Maxim, Hedging Maxims","PeriodicalId":33052,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on Flouting and Hedging Maxims Used by the Main Characters on “Daddy Day Camp”\",\"authors\":\"M. Helmi\",\"doi\":\"10.31539/leea.v6i1.1431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research focused on analyzing flouting and hedging maxims used by the main characters on \\\"Daddy Day Camp\\\". The purposes of this research were to investigate and analyze how the maxims are flouted and hedged by the main characters on \\\"Daddy Day Camp\\\". Qualitative method was used in this research because the data were in the form of words rather than that of numbers and statistics. The data were taken from the utterances spoken by the main characters on \\\"Daddy Day Camp\\\". After the data are collected, they are classified and analyzed based on Grice’s Cooperative principle theory. This research found many maxims of cooperative principle which were flouted and hedged by the main characters on \\\"Daddy Day Camp\\\", especially the maxim of quality and quantity. On the other hand, this research also found that the utterances spoken by the main characters hedged the maxims of cooperative principle. There were some utterances which hedge the maxim of quality and relevance because the utterances which were spoken by the main characters are not totally accurate but seem informative, well founded and relevant. \\nKeywords: Daddy Day Camp, Flouting Maxim, Hedging Maxims\",\"PeriodicalId\":33052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v6i1.1431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v6i1.1431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是分析“爸爸日夏令营”中主要角色使用的蔑视和回避格言。本研究的目的是调查和分析“爸爸日营”中的主要角色是如何藐视和回避这些格言的。由于本研究采用的是文字形式的数据,而不是数字和统计形式的数据,因此本研究采用了定性方法。数据取自“爸爸日营”中主要人物的话语。收集数据后,根据Grice的合作原则理论对数据进行分类和分析。本研究发现,在《爸爸日营》中,许多合作原则格言被主要角色所蔑视和回避,尤其是质量和数量格言。另一方面,本研究还发现,主要人物的话语回避了合作原则的格言。有一些话语违背了质量和相关性的准则,因为主要人物所说的话并不完全准确,但似乎有信息,有根据和相关。关键词:爸爸日营,藐视格言,对冲格言
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on Flouting and Hedging Maxims Used by the Main Characters on “Daddy Day Camp”
This research focused on analyzing flouting and hedging maxims used by the main characters on "Daddy Day Camp". The purposes of this research were to investigate and analyze how the maxims are flouted and hedged by the main characters on "Daddy Day Camp". Qualitative method was used in this research because the data were in the form of words rather than that of numbers and statistics. The data were taken from the utterances spoken by the main characters on "Daddy Day Camp". After the data are collected, they are classified and analyzed based on Grice’s Cooperative principle theory. This research found many maxims of cooperative principle which were flouted and hedged by the main characters on "Daddy Day Camp", especially the maxim of quality and quantity. On the other hand, this research also found that the utterances spoken by the main characters hedged the maxims of cooperative principle. There were some utterances which hedge the maxim of quality and relevance because the utterances which were spoken by the main characters are not totally accurate but seem informative, well founded and relevant. Keywords: Daddy Day Camp, Flouting Maxim, Hedging Maxims
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信