评估同一个健康:团队科学在多部门协作中的作用。

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
K. Errecaborde, C. Rist, D. A. Travis, V. Ragan, T. Potter, A. Pekol, K. Pelican, T. Dutcher
{"title":"评估同一个健康:团队科学在多部门协作中的作用。","authors":"K. Errecaborde, C. Rist, D. A. Travis, V. Ragan, T. Potter, A. Pekol, K. Pelican, T. Dutcher","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a review of the literature surrounding One Health, cross-boundary collaboration, the science of teams, and interdisciplinary health competencies, many individual disciplines, and in some cases multidisciplinary research teams, have looked at the scholarship of collaboration and arrived at remarkably similar conclusions as to which factors and competencies support effective collaboration. However, conclusions on how to effectively evaluate collaboration are consistently lacking across the literature reviewed. Although important advances have been made recently in the area of evaluating One Health operations and outcomes, there is an opportunity to develop process-based performance measures for One Health collaboration and teamwork. Synthesising work on collaborative performance evaluation across multiple disciplinary and sectoral lanes and levels of collaborative analysis, the authors argue that, in addition to outcome-based One Health evaluation, the evaluation of One Health processes needs to be further refined and 'team' effectiveness needs to be evaluated at all levels of the health system: individual, organisational and network.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"41 1","pages":"279-289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating One Health: the role of team science in multisectoral collaboration.\",\"authors\":\"K. Errecaborde, C. Rist, D. A. Travis, V. Ragan, T. Potter, A. Pekol, K. Pelican, T. Dutcher\",\"doi\":\"10.20506/rst.38.1.2960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a review of the literature surrounding One Health, cross-boundary collaboration, the science of teams, and interdisciplinary health competencies, many individual disciplines, and in some cases multidisciplinary research teams, have looked at the scholarship of collaboration and arrived at remarkably similar conclusions as to which factors and competencies support effective collaboration. However, conclusions on how to effectively evaluate collaboration are consistently lacking across the literature reviewed. Although important advances have been made recently in the area of evaluating One Health operations and outcomes, there is an opportunity to develop process-based performance measures for One Health collaboration and teamwork. Synthesising work on collaborative performance evaluation across multiple disciplinary and sectoral lanes and levels of collaborative analysis, the authors argue that, in addition to outcome-based One Health evaluation, the evaluation of One Health processes needs to be further refined and 'team' effectiveness needs to be evaluated at all levels of the health system: individual, organisational and network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"279-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2960\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在对“同一个健康”、跨界合作、团队科学和跨学科卫生能力相关文献的回顾中,许多单独学科,在某些情况下是多学科研究团队,都研究了合作的学术意义,并就哪些因素和能力支持有效合作得出了非常相似的结论。然而,关于如何有效评估合作的结论在文献综述中一直缺乏。尽管最近在评估“同一个健康”的业务和成果方面取得了重要进展,但仍有机会为“同一个健康”的协作和团队合作制定基于流程的绩效衡量标准。综合了跨多个学科和部门通道以及协作分析水平的协作绩效评估工作,作者认为,除了基于结果的One Health评估之外,One Health过程的评估需要进一步完善,并且需要在卫生系统的各个层面(个人、组织和网络)评估“团队”的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating One Health: the role of team science in multisectoral collaboration.
In a review of the literature surrounding One Health, cross-boundary collaboration, the science of teams, and interdisciplinary health competencies, many individual disciplines, and in some cases multidisciplinary research teams, have looked at the scholarship of collaboration and arrived at remarkably similar conclusions as to which factors and competencies support effective collaboration. However, conclusions on how to effectively evaluate collaboration are consistently lacking across the literature reviewed. Although important advances have been made recently in the area of evaluating One Health operations and outcomes, there is an opportunity to develop process-based performance measures for One Health collaboration and teamwork. Synthesising work on collaborative performance evaluation across multiple disciplinary and sectoral lanes and levels of collaborative analysis, the authors argue that, in addition to outcome-based One Health evaluation, the evaluation of One Health processes needs to be further refined and 'team' effectiveness needs to be evaluated at all levels of the health system: individual, organisational and network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scientific and Technical Review is a periodical publication containing scientific information that is updated constantly. The Review plays a significant role in fulfilling some of the priority functions of the OIE. This peer-reviewed journal contains in-depth studies devoted to current scientific and technical developments in animal health and veterinary public health worldwide, food safety and animal welfare. The Review benefits from the advice of an Advisory Editorial Board and a Scientific and Technical Committee composed of top scientists from across the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信