专题讨论会:职业社区伦理摘要

A. Whitford, C. F. Wright, R. Weller, C. Heath
{"title":"专题讨论会:职业社区伦理摘要","authors":"A. Whitford, C. F. Wright, R. Weller, C. Heath","doi":"10.1111/J.1444-0938.1958.TB03570.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \nFirst paper is by an academic psychologist who gives something of the history of ethics and develops that section which has lead to Law-making and then applies the principles to a circumscribed group with interdependence as exemplified in a modern profession, \n \n \n \nSecond paper discusses the growth of ethical controls by mutually agreed restrictive rules, the means of securing obedience to those rules, the advantages and dangers to thte profession as a whole, the need to set each rule by considering its advantage to the public external to the profession. \n \n \n \nThird paper discusses the establishment and maintenance of ethical behaviour by Statutes, Statutory Rules or Regulations and under the supervision of Statutory Boards and the like; the relationship and interdependence of voluntary and legal sanctions. \n \n \n \nFourth paper by a Professional Practitioner discusses how a member of the professional community feels about ethical rules. Those which are common courtesy and need no codifying, those which arise from a feeling of mutual need within the group, those which are artificially applied by a forceful minority, still within the group, and those which are applied by forces external to the group. Minimum of Rules the best. Maintenance of a standard easier than the establishment in the first place. \n \n \n \nThe conclusion by the Chairman discusses how the need to protect a well meaning majority from a malignant minority, the real basis of Law has been harnessed to the advance of ethical standards in professions, how lagging professions may be advanced to the highest current standards, how interprofessional standards can be interrelated, and how evils and restrictive tendencies may be mitigated. What is the path to the future?","PeriodicalId":88139,"journal":{"name":"The Australasian journal of optometry","volume":"46 1","pages":"399-399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1958-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SYMPOSIUM: ETHICS IN A PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY ABSTRACT\",\"authors\":\"A. Whitford, C. F. Wright, R. Weller, C. Heath\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1444-0938.1958.TB03570.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY \\n \\nFirst paper is by an academic psychologist who gives something of the history of ethics and develops that section which has lead to Law-making and then applies the principles to a circumscribed group with interdependence as exemplified in a modern profession, \\n \\n \\n \\nSecond paper discusses the growth of ethical controls by mutually agreed restrictive rules, the means of securing obedience to those rules, the advantages and dangers to thte profession as a whole, the need to set each rule by considering its advantage to the public external to the profession. \\n \\n \\n \\nThird paper discusses the establishment and maintenance of ethical behaviour by Statutes, Statutory Rules or Regulations and under the supervision of Statutory Boards and the like; the relationship and interdependence of voluntary and legal sanctions. \\n \\n \\n \\nFourth paper by a Professional Practitioner discusses how a member of the professional community feels about ethical rules. Those which are common courtesy and need no codifying, those which arise from a feeling of mutual need within the group, those which are artificially applied by a forceful minority, still within the group, and those which are applied by forces external to the group. Minimum of Rules the best. Maintenance of a standard easier than the establishment in the first place. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe conclusion by the Chairman discusses how the need to protect a well meaning majority from a malignant minority, the real basis of Law has been harnessed to the advance of ethical standards in professions, how lagging professions may be advanced to the highest current standards, how interprofessional standards can be interrelated, and how evils and restrictive tendencies may be mitigated. What is the path to the future?\",\"PeriodicalId\":88139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australasian journal of optometry\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"399-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1958-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australasian journal of optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1444-0938.1958.TB03570.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australasian journal of optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1444-0938.1958.TB03570.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一篇论文是由一位学术心理学家撰写的他给出了一些伦理学的历史并发展了导致立法的部分,然后将这些原则应用于一个受限制的相互依赖的群体,就像现代职业中的例子一样,第二篇论文讨论了通过相互同意的限制性规则的道德控制的增长,确保遵守这些规则的方法,对整个职业的好处和危险,制定每条规则都需要考虑到它对公众的好处,而不是对专业的好处。第三篇论文讨论了通过法规、法定规则或规例以及在法定委员会等机构的监督下建立和维持道德行为;自愿制裁和法律制裁的关系和相互依存。第四篇论文由一位专业从业者讨论了专业社区的成员如何看待道德规则。那些是共同的礼貌,不需要编纂,那些产生于群体内的相互需要的感觉,那些由仍然在群体内的强势少数人为实施的,以及那些由群体外部力量实施的。规则越少越好。维持一个标准比建立一个标准更容易。主席的结论讨论了如何保护善意的多数人免受恶意少数人侵害的必要性、如何利用法律的真正基础来提高职业的道德标准、如何将落后的职业提高到目前的最高标准、如何使专业间标准相互关联、以及如何减轻罪恶和限制性倾向。通往未来的道路是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SYMPOSIUM: ETHICS IN A PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY ABSTRACT
SUMMARY First paper is by an academic psychologist who gives something of the history of ethics and develops that section which has lead to Law-making and then applies the principles to a circumscribed group with interdependence as exemplified in a modern profession, Second paper discusses the growth of ethical controls by mutually agreed restrictive rules, the means of securing obedience to those rules, the advantages and dangers to thte profession as a whole, the need to set each rule by considering its advantage to the public external to the profession. Third paper discusses the establishment and maintenance of ethical behaviour by Statutes, Statutory Rules or Regulations and under the supervision of Statutory Boards and the like; the relationship and interdependence of voluntary and legal sanctions. Fourth paper by a Professional Practitioner discusses how a member of the professional community feels about ethical rules. Those which are common courtesy and need no codifying, those which arise from a feeling of mutual need within the group, those which are artificially applied by a forceful minority, still within the group, and those which are applied by forces external to the group. Minimum of Rules the best. Maintenance of a standard easier than the establishment in the first place. The conclusion by the Chairman discusses how the need to protect a well meaning majority from a malignant minority, the real basis of Law has been harnessed to the advance of ethical standards in professions, how lagging professions may be advanced to the highest current standards, how interprofessional standards can be interrelated, and how evils and restrictive tendencies may be mitigated. What is the path to the future?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信