欧盟国家循环经济绩效比较分析

IF 6.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
G. Candan, Merve Cengiz Toklu
{"title":"欧盟国家循环经济绩效比较分析","authors":"G. Candan, Merve Cengiz Toklu","doi":"10.1080/13504509.2022.2084794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Circular economy (CE), which has emerged with the integration of environmental science and sustainable development, has a significant contribution to human development and is a constantly developing concept that can be measured at the country, region, city, or enterprise level. Evaluating the CE performances of the European Union (EU) member countries at specific periods is crucial for monitoring their development. This study bridges the gap in the literature in terms of the method, dataset, and comparative analysis used while measuring the CE performances, and this is one of the first studies to look at the importance weights of CE criteria. In this study, a novel approach is proposed to evaluate the CE performances of EU member countries. The evaluation criteria are based on the European Commission CE monitoring framework in the proposed approach. The importance weights of criteria are determined using the fuzzy Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) approach. The EU member countries are ranked according to their CE performances with the Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) method considering the weights of the evaluation criteria. The proposed evaluation approach is applied by taking 2014, 2016, and 2018 years data into account. As a result of the application, according to the CE efficiency, the top five countries are the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, France, and Germany. The study’s findings can assist researchers and policymakers in gaining a better understanding of countries’ CE performance levels.","PeriodicalId":50287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of the circular economy performances for European Union countries\",\"authors\":\"G. Candan, Merve Cengiz Toklu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13504509.2022.2084794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Circular economy (CE), which has emerged with the integration of environmental science and sustainable development, has a significant contribution to human development and is a constantly developing concept that can be measured at the country, region, city, or enterprise level. Evaluating the CE performances of the European Union (EU) member countries at specific periods is crucial for monitoring their development. This study bridges the gap in the literature in terms of the method, dataset, and comparative analysis used while measuring the CE performances, and this is one of the first studies to look at the importance weights of CE criteria. In this study, a novel approach is proposed to evaluate the CE performances of EU member countries. The evaluation criteria are based on the European Commission CE monitoring framework in the proposed approach. The importance weights of criteria are determined using the fuzzy Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) approach. The EU member countries are ranked according to their CE performances with the Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) method considering the weights of the evaluation criteria. The proposed evaluation approach is applied by taking 2014, 2016, and 2018 years data into account. As a result of the application, according to the CE efficiency, the top five countries are the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, France, and Germany. The study’s findings can assist researchers and policymakers in gaining a better understanding of countries’ CE performance levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2084794\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2084794","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

循环经济是随着环境科学与可持续发展的融合而产生的,它对人类的发展做出了重大贡献,是一个可以在国家、地区、城市、企业层面进行衡量的不断发展的概念。评价欧盟成员国在特定时期的行政绩效对监测其发展至关重要。本研究在测量CE绩效时使用的方法、数据集和比较分析方面弥补了文献中的空白,这是第一个研究CE标准重要性权重的研究之一。本研究提出一种新的方法来评估欧盟成员国的行政绩效。评估标准基于拟议方法中的欧洲委员会CE监测框架。采用模糊简单多属性评定技术(SMART)确定各指标的权重。考虑到评价标准的权重,采用基于距离的组合评价法(CODAS)对欧盟成员国的CE表现进行排名。建议的评估方法通过考虑2014年、2016年和2018年的数据来应用。由于该申请,根据CE效率,排名前五的国家是荷兰、卢森堡、比利时、法国和德国。这项研究的发现可以帮助研究人员和决策者更好地了解各国的CE绩效水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of the circular economy performances for European Union countries
ABSTRACT Circular economy (CE), which has emerged with the integration of environmental science and sustainable development, has a significant contribution to human development and is a constantly developing concept that can be measured at the country, region, city, or enterprise level. Evaluating the CE performances of the European Union (EU) member countries at specific periods is crucial for monitoring their development. This study bridges the gap in the literature in terms of the method, dataset, and comparative analysis used while measuring the CE performances, and this is one of the first studies to look at the importance weights of CE criteria. In this study, a novel approach is proposed to evaluate the CE performances of EU member countries. The evaluation criteria are based on the European Commission CE monitoring framework in the proposed approach. The importance weights of criteria are determined using the fuzzy Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) approach. The EU member countries are ranked according to their CE performances with the Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) method considering the weights of the evaluation criteria. The proposed evaluation approach is applied by taking 2014, 2016, and 2018 years data into account. As a result of the application, according to the CE efficiency, the top five countries are the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, France, and Germany. The study’s findings can assist researchers and policymakers in gaining a better understanding of countries’ CE performance levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
58
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology is now over fifteen years old and has proved to be an exciting forum for understanding and advancing our knowledge and implementation of sustainable development. Sustainable development is now of primary importance as the key to future use and management of finite world resources. It recognises the need for development opportunities while maintaining a balance between these and the environment. As stated by the UN Bruntland Commission in 1987, sustainable development should "meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信