噼啪声策略对学生阅读成绩的影响

IF 2.5 3区社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

European Journal of Development Research Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.28926/jdr.v6i2.256

Annisa Rahmasari, Varia Virdania Virdaus

{"title":"噼啪声策略对学生阅读成绩的影响","authors":"Annisa Rahmasari, Varia Virdania Virdaus","doi":"10.28926/jdr.v6i2.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this study is to determine how well the Click & Clunk approach works in improving students' reading comprehension. In this study, non-randomized pretests and posttests were used in a quasi-experimental setting utilizing quantitative methodologies. Students from SMPN 1 Kanigoro served as the study's subjects, with Class 7H serving as the control group and Class 7I serving as the experimental group. Reading assessments served as the research's tools (pretest and posttest). The control group class, on the other hand, was taught using the KWL method. The experimental group class was taught utilizing the Click & Clunk method. A posttest was then provided to both groups. The data was generated by SPSS Version 20 and then analyzed using ANCOVA. The analysis's findings suggested that the Click and Clunk Strategy could raise children' reading proficiency.","PeriodicalId":47650,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Development Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Click and Clunk Strategy on the Students’ Reading Achievement\",\"authors\":\"Annisa Rahmasari, Varia Virdania Virdaus\",\"doi\":\"10.28926/jdr.v6i2.256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this study is to determine how well the Click & Clunk approach works in improving students' reading comprehension. In this study, non-randomized pretests and posttests were used in a quasi-experimental setting utilizing quantitative methodologies. Students from SMPN 1 Kanigoro served as the study's subjects, with Class 7H serving as the control group and Class 7I serving as the experimental group. Reading assessments served as the research's tools (pretest and posttest). The control group class, on the other hand, was taught using the KWL method. The experimental group class was taught utilizing the Click & Clunk method. A posttest was then provided to both groups. The data was generated by SPSS Version 20 and then analyzed using ANCOVA. The analysis's findings suggested that the Click and Clunk Strategy could raise children' reading proficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Development Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Development Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v6i2.256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Development Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v6i2.256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定咔哒咔哒教学法在提高学生阅读理解能力方面的效果。在这项研究中，非随机前测和后测在准实验环境中使用定量方法。SMPN 1 Kanigoro的学生为研究对象，7H班为对照组，7I班为实验组。阅读评估是研究的工具(前测和后测)。另一方面，对照组班级采用KWL方法进行教学。实验组采用“咔哒咔哒”教学法进行教学。然后对两组进行后测。数据采用SPSS Version 20生成，并用ANCOVA进行分析。分析结果表明，“咔哒咔哒”策略可以提高儿童的阅读能力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Effectiveness of Click and Clunk Strategy on the Students’ Reading Achievement

The goal of this study is to determine how well the Click & Clunk approach works in improving students' reading comprehension. In this study, non-randomized pretests and posttests were used in a quasi-experimental setting utilizing quantitative methodologies. Students from SMPN 1 Kanigoro served as the study's subjects, with Class 7H serving as the control group and Class 7I serving as the experimental group. Reading assessments served as the research's tools (pretest and posttest). The control group class, on the other hand, was taught using the KWL method. The experimental group class was taught utilizing the Click & Clunk method. A posttest was then provided to both groups. The data was generated by SPSS Version 20 and then analyzed using ANCOVA. The analysis's findings suggested that the Click and Clunk Strategy could raise children' reading proficiency.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Development Research DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Development Research (EJDR) redefines and modernises what international development is, recognising the many schools of thought on what human development constitutes. It encourages debate between competing approaches to understanding global development and international social development. The journal is multidisciplinary and welcomes papers that are rooted in any mixture of fields including (but not limited to): development studies, international studies, social policy, sociology, politics, economics, anthropology, education, sustainability, business and management. EJDR explicitly links with development studies, being hosted by European Association of Development Institutes (EADI) and its various initiatives. As a double-blind peer-reviewed academic journal, we particularly welcome submissions that improve our conceptual understanding of international development processes, or submissions that propose policy and developmental tools by analysing empirical evidence, whether qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or anecdotal (data use in the journal ranges broadly from narratives and transcripts, through ethnographic and mixed data, to quantitative and survey data). The research methods used in the journal''s articles make explicit the importance of empirical data and the critical interpretation of findings. Authors can use a mixture of theory and data analysis to expand the possibilities for global development. Submissions must be well-grounded in theory and must also indicate how their findings are relevant to development practitioners in the field and/or policy makers. The journal encourages papers which embody the highest quality standards, and which use an innovative approach. We urge authors who contemplate submitting their work to the EJDR to respond to research already published in this journal, as well as complementary journals and books. We take special efforts to include global voices, and notably voices from the global South. Queries about potential submissions to EJDR can be directed to the Editors. EJDR understands development to be an ongoing process that affects all communities, societies, states and regions: We therefore do not have a geographical bias, but wherever possible prospective authors should seek to highlight how their study has relevance to researchers and practitioners studying development in different environments. Although many of the papers we publish examine the challenges for developing countries, we recognize that there are important lessons to be derived from the experiences of regions in the developed world. The EJDR is print-published 6 times a year, in a mix of regular and special theme issues; accepted papers are published on an ongoing basis online. We accept submissions in English and French.